Chiral auxiliaries substrate control

Metabolic cyclization routes of polyenes leading to terpenes [1] inspired chemists to synthesize steroids and polycyclic structures [2]. Metal catalysis, chiral auxiliaries, substrate control, and other stoichiometric methods reach some level of success [3], but only recently Rendler and MacMillan published independently two approaches using organo-SOMO catalysis to synthesize these features (Scheme 10.1) [4], as a continuation of their work on the asymmetric cyclization of aldehydes [5]. 

Spatial and/or coordinative bias can be introduced into a reaction substrate by coupling it to an auxiliary or controller group, which may be achiral or chiral. The use of chiral controller groups is often used to generate enantioselectively the initial stereocenters in a multistep synthetic sequence leading to a stereochemically complex molecule. Some examples of the application of controller groups to achieve stereoselectivity are shown retrosynthetically in Chart 19. 

Chiral Controller. (Synonymous with Chiral Auxiliary). A chiral structural unit which when attached to a substrate enhances stereoselectivity in the formation of new stereocenter(s). 

The most valuable characteristic of the Patemo-Buchi reaction is the ability to set multiple stereocenters in one reaction and the development of diastereocontrolled reactions has been a major theme of research concerning this reaction. Stereocontrol can be envisioned to spring from either the carbonyl or the alkene and be controlled by either the substrate directly or by a chiral auxiliary. Little success has been achieved in substrate-induced selection by the carbonyl the most successful results were produced by... 

Ironically, auxiliary-induced control via the alkene failed to generate synthetically useful selectivities, but direct substrate-induced control did. In particular, chiral silyl enol ethers with stereocenters in the y-position allowed the synthesis of enantiomerically... 

In Ugi four-component reactions (for mechanism, see Section 1.4.4.1.) all four components may potentially serve as the stereodifferentiating tool65. However, neither the isocyanide component nor the carboxylic acid have pronounced effects on the overall stereodiscrimination60 66. As a consequence, the factors influencing the stereochemical course of Ugi reactions arc similar to those in Strecker syntheses. The use of chiral aldehydes is commonly found in substrate-controlled syntheses whereas the asymmetric synthesis of new enantiomerically pure compounds via Ugi s method is restricted to the application of optically active amines as the chiral auxiliary group. 

The latter work is a rare example in which a high stereoselectivity was reported for a substrate-controlled Ugi synthesis. In asymmetric Ugi reactions carried out with removable chiral auxiliaries, however, high diastei eoselections were achieved (see Section 1.4.4.3.1.). 

There are many reports on the asymmetric addition of nucleophiles to carbon-nitrogen double bonds [6]. However, the majority of these reports are based on substrate control and rely on chiral auxiliaries in imines. Moreover, almost all of these reports are just for aldo-imine cases [7]. 

Mg11 complexes are also effective for controlling asymmetric radical reactions.33,34 Moreover, enantioselective radical reactions using chiral Mg11 complexes have been studied, and high enantioselectivities have been realized in the presence of stoichiometric or catalytic amounts of chiral auxiliaries such as bis-oxazolines (Scheme 8).35-39 In most cases, substrates having bidentate chelating moieties are required. 

In principle, asymmetric synthesis involves the formation of a new stereogenic unit in the substrate under the influence of a chiral group ultimately derived from a naturally occurring chiral compound. These methods can be divided into four major classes, depending on how this influence is exerted (1) substrate-controlled methods (2) auxiliary-controlled methods (3) reagent-controlled methods, and (4) catalyst-controlled methods. 

An enantioselective catalyst must fulfill two functions (1) activate the different reactants (activation) and (2) control the stereochemical outcome of the reaction (controlling function). As an accepted general model, it is postulated that this control is achieved by specific interactions between the active centers of the catalyst, the adsorbed substrates, and the adsorbed chiral auxiliary (Figure 14.4). Experience has shown that most substrates that can be transformed in useful enantiomers have an additional functional group that can interact with the chiral active center. 

The chiral auxiliaries anchored to the substrate, which is subjected to diastereoselective catalysis, is another factor that can control these reactions. These chiral auxiliaries should be easily removed after reduction without damaging the hydrogenated substrate. A representative example in this sense is given by Gallezot and coworkers [268], They used (-)mentoxyacetic acid and various (S)-proline derivates as chiral auxiliaries for the reduction of o-cresol and o-toluic acid on Rh/C. A successful use of proline derivates in asymmetric catalysis has also been reported by Harada and coworkers [269,270], The nature of the solvent only has a slight influence on the d.e. [271],... 

Access to the corresponding enantiopure hydroxy esters 133 and 134 of smaller fragments 2 with R =Me employed a highly stereoselective (ds>95%) Evans aldol reaction of allenic aldehydes 113 and rac-114 with boron enolate 124 followed by silylation to arrive at the y-trimethylsilyloxy allene substrates 125 and 126, respectively, for the crucial oxymercuration/methoxycarbonylation process (Scheme 19). Again, this operation provided the desired tetrahydrofurans 127 and 128 with excellent diastereoselectivity (dr=95 5). Chemoselective hydrolytic cleavage of the chiral auxiliary, chemoselective carboxylic acid reduction, and subsequent diastereoselective chelation-controlled enoate reduction (133 dr of crude product=80 20, 134 dr of crude product=84 16) eventually provided the pure stereoisomers 133 and 134 after preparative HPLC. 

The first attempts to develop reactions offering control over the absolute stereochemistry of a chiral center, created by y-selective substitution of an achiral allylic alcohol-derived substrate, involved the use of chiral auxiliaries incorporated in the nucleofuge. The types of stereodirecting groups utilized vary, and have included sulfoximines [15], carbamates [16], and chiral heterocyclic sulfides [17-19]. 

Apart from cyclic or acyclic transition state geometry further distinctions of diastereoselec-tion have to be made with respect to the way in which the chiral center is attached to the reactive site. The term auxiliary control is used if a chiral subunit, e.g., an alcohol or an amine, is fixed covalently to the unsaturated substrate and then removed by bond cleavage after the addition. In contrast, if the stereogenic center remains part of the molecule after the addition, the term substrate control is applied (these definitions are given in Section A. 1.). 

A Lewis-acid-mediated intramolecular cyclization of allenyl stannane 344 furnishes 2,6- //-tetrahydropyran as the major product, the stereochemistry of which can be switched to syn with moderate effect if a propargylstannane 345 is used as a substrate (Equation 147, Table 16) <1996TL3059>. The stereoselectivity observed in an analogous system, the intramolecular cyclization of y-alkoxyallyl stannanes 346 with a tethered aldehyde, can be controlled by changing the geometry of the alkene (Scheme 83) <1997JOC7439>. y-Alkoxyallyl stannanes are also known to cyclize both diastereoselectively and enantioselectivity, by incorporation of both a chiral auxiliary and a chiral catalyst respectively into the reaction <1999JOC4901>. 

The Paterson second-generation approach substantially reduced the total number of steps required to complete discodermolide. Notably, the use of chiral reagents and auxiliaries was completely eliminated, relying solely on substrate control to configure all the remaining stereocentres from the ubiquitous Roche ester (18), achieving a more cost-effective route. 

Stereocentres configured by substrate-controlled reactions bStereocentres configured by reagent-auxiliary-controlled reactions Stereocentres accessed from chiral pool starting materials dData from Myles full disclosure in 2003 [52]... 

Asymmetric oxidations have followed the usual development pathway where face selectivity was observed through the use of chiral auxiliaries and templates. The breakthrough came with the Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation method, which, although stoichiometric, allowed for a wide range of substrates and the stereochemistry of the product to be controlled in a predictable manner.4... 

Control over the absolute configuration in cyclohexenone photocycloadditions has been achieved by auxiliary-induced diastereoselectivity. In particular, esters related to compound 26, which are derived from a chiral alcohol but not from methanol, lend themselves as potential precursors, from which the chiral auxiliary can be effectively cleaved [42, 43]. In a recent study, the use of additives was advertised to increase the diastereomeric excess in these reactions [44], An intriguing auxiliary-induced approach was presented by Piva et al., who employed chiral 13-hydroxy-carboxylic adds as tethers to control both the regioselectivity and the diastereoselectivity of intramolecular [2 + 2]-photocycloaddition reactions [45]. In Scheme 6.14 the reaction of the (S)-mandelic acid derived substrate 38 is depicted, which led with very good stereocontrol almost exclusively to product 39a, with the other diastereoisomer 39b being formed only in minor quantities (39a/39b = 96/4). Other acids, such as (S)-lactic acid, performed equally well. The chiral tether could be cleaved under basic conditions to afford enantiomerically pure cydobutane lactones in good yields. 

---