Chemoinvestigation and stimulus uptake

One well-analysed chemosignal system is that of the Red-bellied Newt (Cynops pyrrhogaster). Males of this species produce from the abdominal gland a semiochemical protein (sodefrin) with marked VNO activity as a female attractant (Kikuyama et al., 1997). Courtship displays of newts often contain tail-waving bouts, which direct cloacal or other secretions from the male toward female recipients (Fig. 3.1). A large stable molecule like sodefrin, alone or as part of a VNPr complex, is presumably suitable for such local transference. 

Temporal alterations in peripheral chemoreceptors are rare in vertebrates, but this group provides an example of transient enhancement of signal capture efficiency. The Red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus) shows dimorphic and seasonal VNO volume fluctuations. Males always possess a significantly larger vomeronasal area, and both 

AOS responsiveness to hormonal influences is shown in the action of sodefrin on the lateral nasal sinus of newts (Cynops). The receptors in the accessory pocket are differentially affected by pituitary and ovarian hormones (Toyoda et al., 2000). The local EOG response to the pheromone (Fig. 5.1) was enhanced by the presence of prolactin or of estrogen alone. Receptor sensitivity increase is perhaps an alternate strategy to AOS receptor density increase several alternate routes of signal r- receptor adaptation (Fig. 7.1) have been hypothesised (Sorenson and Stacey, 1998). 

The chemoreceptive mechanisms in amphibia are undoubtedly worthy of further analysis, not only for their own sake, but to provide clues as to the origination of advanced chemosignal systems. As noted above, a pheromonal signal from the mental gland acts as a courtship/ receptivity inducer. The plethodontid receptivity factor (PRF) (Chap. 3) despite its size (22 kD), seems to have been converted from its internal role as an inter-cellular cytokine, to an inter-individual coordinator of reproductive activity (Rollmann et al., 1999). Endocrine or 

The operational variants in tongue movement so far detected, are a simple extension/retraction and oscillations — occurring singly or as multiple bouts Fig. 7.3(a) the latter type can be divided into those with slow motion and those of normal duration (Toubeau, 1994). 

---