Chemical looping process integration

Another integrated carbon capture technology is called the fuel-flexible process developed by General Electric (GE). This process takes different feedstocks such as coal and biomass and produces hydrogen and electricity in adjustable ratios (Rizeq et al., 2002). The reaction scheme for this process involves two chemical loops operated using three fluidized-bed reactors as shown in Figure 17.5. 

Chemical-looping modifications of these processes open novel possibilities to address some of the main concerns associated with each of these processes as discussed below. The earliest CLR studies simply explored integration of CLC with a conventional reforming process [78,91-93]. For example, Ryden et al. [78] integrated the cran-bustion of the pressure-swing off-gas of a conventional SRM process to serve as the fuel for a CLC reducer reactor. This allows the capture of any carbon that was not cmiverted to CO in the reforming process itself via CO2 capture in the CLC step while providing some of the heat necessary for the endothermic reaction in the steam reformer. 

The required reliability and robustness of analyzers applies also to process analyzers. At this moment relatively little chemical analyzers can meet the high standards and, therefore, are seldom used as an integral part of the automatic control loop. This means that most of the chemical production processes are still automatically controlled by... 

For continuous processes the catalytic reactor, or a hybrid process if satisfactory chemical dosing equipment is already installed, appear to be a near-optimum solution still for many installations. At moderate hypochlorite concentrations, economic benefit does accrue from using the catalyst in-loop rather than end-of-pipe, but these benefits may be offset by any required investment in heat-exchange capability. At concentrations above 10 wt% the integration of decomposition into the scrubbing process is beneficial to the overall cost base of hypochlorite treatment. 

Integrating over the hysteresis loop between the compression and decompression curves in Figure 19 yields the amount of energy dissipated through the reversible bond formation/dissociation process. Unfortunately, it is not possible to determine the contribution of these transitions to the friction of phosphate films because such a calculation would require knowledge of the number of similar instabilities that occur per sliding distance, which is certainly beyond the limits of first-principles calculations. Nonetheless, the results do indicate that pressure- and shear-induced chemical reactions can contribute to the friction of materials. 

The first alternative simplifies the heat integration of the chemical process, and the second simplifies the interface between the chemical process and the secondary loop. CEA (Leybros, 2009) has designed their S-I process for the first alternative, as the requirements for the reactor expected to be used are most suitable for it. GA has developed flow sheets for both alternatives. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) is a partner of both CEA and GA in the operation of a demonstration loop for the S-I cycle. SNL is charged with design and operation of the sulphuric acid decomposition section. They have developed a bayonet-heater design for the decomposer which incorporates internal heat recovery. As a result, the outlet temperature of the bayonet heat modules is too low to use in the HI decomposition section. Thus, helium is utilised in the HI decomposition section, as in the CEA flow sheets. 

Step 3 of our plantwide control design procedure involves two activities. The first is to design the control loops for the removal of heat from exothermic chemical reactors. We dealt with this problem in Chap. 4, where we showed various methods to remove heat from exothermic reactors and how to control the temperature in such reactors. At that point we assumed that the heat was removed directly and permanently from the process (e.g., by cooling water). How-ever. it is wasteful to discard the reactor heat to plant utilities when we need to add heat in other unit operations within the process. Instead, a more efficient alternative is to heat-integrate various parts of the plant by the use of process-to-process heat exchangers. 

There are essentially two different types of large-scale US-assisted chemical plants batch and flow type. Sometimes, the flow system is an integral part of the batch processing equipment, where it acts as a loop attached to the main vat. 

Derivative control action is also referred to as rate action, preact, or anticipatory control. Its function is to anticipate the future behavior of the error signal by computing its rate of change thus, the shape of the error signal influences the controller output. Derivative action is never used alone, but in conjunction with proportional and integral control. Derivative control is used to improve the dynamic response of the controlled variable by decreasing the process response time. If the process measurement is noisy, however, derivative action will ampHfy the noise unless the measurement is filtered. Consequently, derivative action is seldom used in flow controllers because flow control loops respond quickly and flow measurements tend to be noisy. In the chemical industry, there are more PI control loops than PID. 

---