Chemical combination, laws

The dawn of the nineteenth century saw a drastic shift from the dominance of French chemistry to first English-, and, later, German-influenced chemistry. Lavoisier s dualistic views of chemical composition and his explanation of combustion and acidity were landmarks but hardly made chemistry an exact science. Chemistry remained in the nineteenth century basically qualitative in its nature. Despite the Newtonian dream of quantifying the forces of attraction between chemical substances and compiling a table of chemical affinity, no quantitative generalization emerged. It was Dalton s chemical atomic theory and the laws of chemical combination explained by it that made chemistry an exact science. 

The CRE approach for modeling chemical reactors is based on mole and energy balances, chemical rate laws, and idealized flow models.2 The latter are usually constructed (Wen and Fan 1975) using some combination of plug-flow reactors (PFRs) and continuous-stirred-tank reactors (CSTRs). (We review both types of reactors below.) The CRE approach thus avoids solving a detailed flow model based on the momentum balance equation. However, this simplification comes at the cost of introducing unknown model parameters to describe the flow rates between various sub-regions inside the reactor. The choice of a particular model is far from unique,3 but can result in very different predictions for product yields with complex chemistry. 

John Dalton, 1766—1844. English Quaker chemist. Teacher of mathematics and physics at New College, Manchester. In his New System of Chemistry he showed how his atomic theory can be used to explain the laws which govern chemical combination. He also made careful meteorological observations and described color-blindness (daltonism). See also ref. (32). 

The classical, or Daltonian, laws of chemical combination depend on strong, primary forces between atoms. Covalency, for instance, nearly always produces discrete molecules, with a well defined structure, and a fixed composition. Only in special cases do the weaker secondary forces give such clear-cut products. The difference is mainly due to the weakness of the forces but it is also due to... 

Chemical combination of elements to make different substances occurs when atoms join together in small whole-number ratios. Only if whole numbers of atoms combine will different samples of a pure compound always contain the same proportion of elements by mass (the law of definite proportions). Fractional parts of atoms are never involved in chemical reactions. 

The proportions of the constituents of air vary a little in different localities, but even this small variation is not found with pure chemical compounds—law of constant proportions. Hence, not all the nitrogen and oxygen are combined. 

While Lavoisier undoubtedly laid the foundations for the rapid rise of chemistry in the nineteenth century, his work was supported by that of other French chemists both before and after him.247 Without the Lavoisierian notion of the chemical element, it is unlikely that the chemical atomic theory and the laws of chemical combination would have been so widely accepted. However, a new perspective on the history of the concept of the chemical compound as the basis of modem chemistry suggests that it began long before Lavoisier and belongs to a different line of development involving the notion of chemical affinity .248-250... 

In the early years of the nineteenth century, the new chemistry began to bear fruit on both sides of the Channel,270 as well as in other countries, notably in Sweden. The chemical atomic theory proposed by Dalton and developed by Berzelius led to the formulation of the stoichiometric laws of chemical combination and the diligent search for accurate atomic weights. The important link between atoms and electrical charges in the early years of the nineteenth century enabled a new interpretation of chemical combination and the theory of valency. Significant improvements in... 

Newtonian ideas about chemical combination made inroads in France in the second half of the century, and affinity tables proliferated. By 1778, Mac-quer (1718—84)had decided that there were no separate laws of chemical affinity and that the law of universal attraction would suffice to explain the whole of chemistry, if only we could learn about the shape of the particles of bodies. In the same year, the second edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica asserted that all theories of affinity were conjectural, neither is it a matter of any consequence to a chemist whether they are right or wrong. Here was a recognition that the utility of a scientific theory need not depend upon its truth. Affinity tables were above all useful, in providing a summary of existing knowledge about chemical reactions as well as a tool for predicting new reactions. 

John Dalton (1766-1844) was the most influential of those who argued that chemical atoms were also physical atoms. He was the inventor of a truly chemical atomic theory, where atoms were the least part of chemical elements. He also discovered a series of numerical laws and rules expressing the rules governing chemical combination. 

It was not until 1858 that Cannizzaro showed how Avogadro s principle accounted for the reactions of gases and a great variety of chemical combinations. Since then it has come to be recognized as one of the most fundamental laws of chemistry. It has been said that modern chemistry dates from 1858. 

Why, in the light of the law of molecular concentration, should one expect the solubility of sodium chloride to be lessened by the presence of hydrochloric acid It may be stated that another effect known as the salting-out effect also comes into play here and likewise tends to lessen the solubility of sodium chloride. The great amount of heat liberated when hydrogen chloride dissolves in water indicates a chemical action, and it is very probable that the water and hydrogen chloride unite to form an unstable compound. In the saturated solution then nearly all the water is chemically combined and very little is left to hold sodium chloride in solution. 

Indeed it seems hardly likely that much progress can be made in the solution of the difficult problems relating to chemical combination by assigning in advance definite laws of force between the positive and... 

To calculate some of the quantities involved in chemical combinations of elements, using the classical laws known at Dalton s time... 

To interpret the classical laws of chemical combination using Dalton s atomic theory... 

In 1803, John Dalton (1766-1844) (Figure 3.3) proposed his atomic theory, including the following postulates, to explain the laws of chemical combination discussed in Section 3.1 ... 

The first three postulates have had to be amended, and the fifth was qnickly abandoned altogether. But the postulates explained the laws of chemical combination known at the time, and they cansed great activity among chemists, which led to more generalizations and further advances in chemistry. 

The postulates of Dalton s atomic theory explained the laws of chemical combination very readily. 

Dalton suggested that the elements are composed of indivisible atoms and that the atoms of each element have a characteristic mass, different from the mass of any other element. He stated that the atoms combine to form molecules when the elements combine to form compounds. These postulates explained the laws of chemical combination known at that time, but most of them have been... 

---