Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Cellulose activation parameters

Activation energy Activation of cellulose Activation parameters Activation volume Activators... [Pg.15]

It should be born in mind, however, that the activation parameters calculated refer to the sum of several reactions, whose enthalpy and/or entropy changes may have different signs from those of the decrystalUzation proper. Specifically, the contribution to the activation parameters of the interactions that occur in the solvent system should be taken into account. Consider the energetics of association of the solvated ions with the AGU. We may employ the extra-thermodynamic quantities of transfer of single ions from aprotic to protic solvents as a model for the reaction under consideration. This use is appropriate because recent measurements (using solvatochromic indicators) have indicated that the polarity at the surface of cellulose is akin to that of aliphatic alcohols [99]. Single-ion enthalpies of transfer indicate that Li+ is more efficiently solvated by DMAc than by alcohols, hence by cellulose. That is, the equilibrium shown in Eq. 7 is endothermic ... [Pg.123]

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) measures cellulose pyrolytic mass loss rates and activation parameters. The technique is relatively simple, straightforward and fast, but it does have disadvantages. One disadvantage is that determination of the kinetic rate constants from TGA data is dependent on the interpretation/analysis technique used. Another disadvantage of TGA is that the rate of mass loss is probably not equivalent to the cellulose pyrolysis rate. [Pg.335]

Both 1st- and 2nd-order rate expressions gave statistically good fits for the control samples, while the treated samples were statistically best analyzed by 2nd-order kinetics. The rate constants, lst-order activation parameters, and char/residue yields for the untreated samples were related to cellulose crystallinity. In addition, AS+ values for the control samples suggested that the pyrolytic reaction proceeds through an ordered transition state. The mass loss rates and activation parameters for the phosphoric acid-treated samples implied that the mass loss mechanism was different from that for the control untreated samples. The higher rates of mass loss and... [Pg.335]

The TGA system was a Perkin-Elmer TGS-2 thermobalance with System 4 controller. Sample mass was 2 to 4 mgs with a N2 flow of 30 cc/min. Samples were initially held at 110°C for 10 minutes to remove moisture and residual air, then heated at a rate of 150°C/min to the desired temperature set by the controller. TGA data from the initial four minutes once the target pyrolysis temperature was reached was not used to calculate rate constants in order to avoid temperature lag complications. Reaction temperature remained steady and was within 2°C of the desired temperature. The actual observed pyrolysis temperature was used to calculate activation parameters. The dimensionless "weight/mass" Me was calculated using Equation 1. Instead of calculating Mr by extrapolation of the isothermal plot to infinity, Mr was determined by heating each sample/additive to 550°C under N2. This method was used because cellulose TGA rates have been shown to follow Arrhenius plots (4,8,10-12,15,16,19,23,26,31). Thus, Mr at infinity should be the same regardless of the isothermal pyrolysis temperature. A few duplicate runs were made to insure that the results were reproducible and not affected by sample size and/or mass. The Me values were calculated at 4-minute intervals to give 14 data points per run. These values were then used to... [Pg.337]

Table II. Activation Parameters for Pyrolysis (Rate of Weight Loss) for Untreated Cellulose Samples Based on Data in Table I... Table II. Activation Parameters for Pyrolysis (Rate of Weight Loss) for Untreated Cellulose Samples Based on Data in Table I...
Cellulose pyrolysis kinetics, as measured by isothermal TGA mass loss, were statistically best fit using 1st- or 2nd-order for the untreated (control) samples and 2nd-order for the cellulose samples treated with three additives. Activation parameters obtained from the TGA data of the untreated samples suggest that the reaction mechanism proceeded through an ordered transition state. Sample crystallinity affected the rate constants, activation parameters, and char yields of the untreated cellulose samples. Various additives had different effects on the mass loss. For example, phosphoric acid and aluminum chloride probably increased the rate of dehydration, while boric acid may have inhibited levoglucosan... [Pg.358]

Stability and Performance of Bound En me. The stability of the IME was determined by two methods. One measurement of bound activity was obtained using traditional cellulose hydrolysis experiments (described below). In the other method, direct kinetic parameter measurements were obtained using a recirculating differential (RDR) reactor system following the method of Ford et al. (46). [Pg.142]

In an attempt to separate the domains from the cores, we used limited degradation with several proteases. CBH I (65 kda) and CBH II (58 kda) under native conditions could only be cleaved successfully with papain (15). The cores (56 and 45 kda) and terminal peptides (11 and 13 kda) were isolated by affinity chromatography (15,16) and the scission points were determined unequivocally. The effect on the activity of these enzymes was quite remarkable (Fig. 7). The cores remained perfectly active towards soluble substrates such as those described above. They exhibited, however, a considerably decreased activity towards native (microcrystalline) cellulose. These effects could be attributed to the loss of the terminal peptides, which were recognized as binding domains, whose role is to raise the relative concentration of the intact enzymes on the cellulose surface. This aspect is discussed further below. The tertiary structures of the intact CBH I and its core in solution were examined by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analysis (17,18). The molecular parameters derived for the core (Rj = 2.09 mm, Dmax = 6.5 nm) and for the intact CBH I (R = 4.27 nm, Dmax = 18 nm) indicated very different shapes for both enzymes. Models constructed on the basis of these SAXS measurements showed a tadpole structure for the intact enzyme and an isotropic ellipsoid for the core (Fig. 8). The extended, flexible tail part of the tadpole should thus be identified with the C-terminal peptide of CBH I. [Pg.580]

The objective of another project was to evaluate the level of pollution in water and sediments in Lake Turawskie, a storage reservoir built in the 1930s on the Mala Panew River in southwestern Poland, and then to search for a correlation between the analytical chemical results and the toxicity parameters estimated from the application of biotests. Polluted waters as well as large amounts of polluted sediments enter the reservoir from the Mala Panew and its tributary, the Libawa. Industrial activities in the river basin include silver, zinc, and lead processing plants, steel and glass manufacture, and the production of cellulose and chemicals. Agriculture presents a further potential threat (e.g., fertilizer and pesticide run-off), as does the use of the reservoir s banks for recreational purposes. [Pg.215]


See other pages where Cellulose activation parameters is mentioned: [Pg.123]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.865]    [Pg.865]    [Pg.4319]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.1183]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.230]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.338 , Pg.339 , Pg.340 , Pg.341 , Pg.342 , Pg.343 , Pg.344 , Pg.345 , Pg.346 , Pg.347 , Pg.348 , Pg.349 , Pg.350 , Pg.351 , Pg.352 , Pg.353 , Pg.354 ]




SEARCH



Activation parameters

Activity parameters

Cellulose activation

Cellulose activity

© 2024 chempedia.info