Cationic surfactant binding to anionic

Fonnation of a complex with a copper cation only further stimulates this behaviour. As a result, S.lg is almost completely bound to the micelles, even at low concentrations of Cu(DS)2. By contrast, the reaction of 5.1 f still benefits from an increasing surfactant concentration at 10 mM of Cu(DS)2. In fact, it is surprising that the reaction of this anionic compound is catalysed at all by an anionic surfactant. Probably it is the copper complex of 5.If, being overall cationic, that binds to the micelle. Not surprisingly, the neutral substrate S.lc shows intermediate behaviour. 

Counterion specificity has been observed to be markedly more pronounced for cationic surfactants than for anionic ones. This can certainly be mainly referred to a weaker hydration of typical counter-anions. From the variation of CMC with counterion and from ion activity measurements it can be inferred that the binding to -N(CH3)3 and -NH3 headgroups follows the sequence P>NOj >Br > CP. (As an example a recent study223-1 of decylammonium salts shows the CMC to decrease from 0.064 M for the chloride to 0.038 M for the iodide). The counterion specific effects on micellar shape for -N(CH3)3 surfactants were discussed above. For cationic (as well as some anionic) amphiphiles, a marked counterion specificity is also indicated in the phase diagrams8 but systematic studies of the counterion dependence have not yet been reported. 

Fig. 3. Sketchy drawing of HDTMA forming a bilayer (tail to tail) on the surface of clinoptilolite [50]. Nonpolar organic molecules (PCE) partition into the bilayer, anions (Cr04 ) exchange with the counterions of the surfactant, cations (Pb ) bind to the zeolite surface.

The cationic charge on a polymer affects its behavior considerably when surfactants are included in formulations. Cationic polymers (a member of the broader class of polymers termed polyelectrolytes) usually interact strongly with anionic surfactants, weakly with cationic surfactants, and unpredictably with nonionic and amphoteric surfactants (14,167-169). Anionic surfactant binds to cationic polymers at concentrations well below the critical micelle concentration (cmc). The low surfactant concentration where polymer and surfactant begin to interact is known as the critical aggregation concentration (cag). 

Quaternary ammonium compounds are cationic surfactants that bind well to anionic surfaces like the protein in hair. The ammonium end sticks to the hair, leaving the long fatty end of the molecule to act as a lubricant. They are slightly conductive, so they reduce the buildup of static electricity. Quats, as they are sometimes called, include compounds like stearalkonium chloride, disteardimonium chloride, quaternium-5, or quaternium-18, polyquaternium-10 and they are all similar in form and function to cetrimonium chloride. These compounds are also widely used as fabric softeners, for all of the same reasons they make good hair conditioners. They are also used to thicken the shampoo. 

Surfactants. The use of surfactants is greatly restricted in formulating ophthalmic solutions. The order of surfactant toxicity is anionic > cationic >> nonionic. Several nonionic surfactants are used in relatively low concentrations to aid in dispersing steroids in suspensions and to achieve or to improve solution clarity. Those principally used are the sorbitan ether esters of oleic acid (Polysorbate or Tween 20 and 80), polymers of oxyethylated octyl phenol (Tyloxapol), and polyoxyl 40 stearate. The lowest concentration possible is used to perform the desired function. Their effect on preservative efficacy and their possible binding by macromolecules must be taken into account, as well as their effect on ocular irritation. The use of surfactants as cosolvents for an ophthalmic solution of chloramphenicol has been described [271]. This com-... 

The method for creating acceptor sink condition discussed so far is based on the use of a surfactant solution. In such solutions, anionic micelles act to accelerate the transport of lipophilic molecules. We also explored the use of other sink-forming reagents, including serum proteins and uncharged cyclodextrins. Table 7.20 compares the sink effect of 100 mM (5-cyclodextrin added to the pH 7.4 buffer in the acceptor wells to that of the anionic surfactant. Cyclodextrin creates a weaker sink for the cationic bases, compared to the anionic surfactant. The electrostatic binding force between charged lipophilic bases and the anionic surfactant micelles... 

---