Catastrophic thinking

A panic attack is a discrete episode of unexpected terror accompanied by a variety of physical symptoms. Associated symptoms include fear and anxiety, as well as catastrophic thinking with a sense of impending doom or the belief that loss of control, death, or insanity is imminent. Physical symptoms can be neurologic, gastrointestinal, cardiac, or pulmonary and therefore may mimic many different types of medical illnesses. Panic attacks have therefore sometimes been called the great medical imposters. Behaviors associated with panic attacks typically include an attempt to flee the situation and eventually to avoid anxiety-producing situations or any situation that has previously been associated with a panic attack. 

This catastrophic thinking is also applied to their own organisations and airlines. There is a pervasive assumption that an air accident will damage or destroy the airline just as much as the airliner involved. Investigators have seen this before ... 

Absolute risk estimates can be difficult to use when there is no apparent human experience against which to calibrate them. By definition, there never exists enough experience about catastrophic rare events (fortunately) with which to calibrate the thinking about their significance. If there were enough data, you would not have elected to do the QRA in the first place. So, now thatyou have a bottom line estimate... 

It is prophetic that Firket (1), in speaking about public anxiety about potential catastrophes, said, "This apprehension was quite justified, when we think that proportionately, the public services of London, for example, might be faced with the responsibility of 3200 sudden deaths if such phenomenon occurred there" (p. 1192). In 1952, such a catastrophe occurred (see Section III,C). 

Edgar I ve done that. It is sort of catastrophic. I don t think the inhibitors give a nice clean arrest. 

Saunders, P.T. (1980). An Introduction to Catastrophe Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Weinberg, G.M. (1975). An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. Wiley, New York. 

The validity of a first-order decay law over time for the activity of enzymes according to Eq. (2.19), with [E]t and [E]0 as the active enzyme concentration at time t or 0, respectively, and kd as the deactivation rate constant, is based on the suitability of thinking of the deactivation process of enzymes in terms of Boltzmann statistics. These statistics cause a certain number of active protein molecules to deactivate momentarily with a rate constant proportional to the amount of active protein [ for evidence for such a catastrophic decomposition, see Craig (1996)]. 

With increasingly networked, distributed computer systems the risk of deliberate malicious interactions, using software-based tools, became a serious threat. Many-fold related issues like data protection, privacy, integrity, authenticity, and denial of service attacks, viruses, worms etc. lead to a separate community to be established, which is nowadays in the main focus of the public as was safety some time ago (and still is—but only after catastrophic events). This community developed separate standards, methods, taxonomy and ways of thinking. 

Water has the unique ability to expand 1570 times when changing from a liquid to a vapor, and to contract 1570 times when it is condensing. To visualize this dramatic contraction, just think that a typical rail tank car filled with steam at atmospheric pressure could condense to the volume of 10 or 11 gallons of water. [1] These properties can result in destructive vacuum damage as just shown. The explosive expansion from water to steam can result in a catastrophic incident as the next case history graphically demonstrates. 

Looking at things in retrospect, it s too bad that it took a near-catastrophic illness to turn me around. I think of all those years I could have enjoyed more. Sooner would have been better than later, but later was better than never. Now I swear I ll never go back to the old ways. Life is a lot more fun when you have the energy to enjoy it. 

Is such thinking taking uniformitarianism too far Perhaps obviously the distant past was different from the present day, so the actualistic instant uniformity model (Fig. 3) does not completely apply Earth has changed greatly over time, and the past was different. The coffee-pot model has more appeal the Earth has surely evolved through its own internal constraints, for example by dissipating heat. The cafetiere (plunger) model allows periodic catastrophes, and may more nearly describe the Earth s history part uniformitarian, part-catastrophic. 

Joan cannot conclude that this study has proven anything. She should get out of the tobacco production field. Cigarette manufacturers are under a very dark cloud of lying, hypocrisy, and financial catastrophe. Even thinking about new additives to enhance the quality of the smoke is equivalent to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. 

Why is artificial blood needed The fear of blood transfusions is on the rise. Even though many safeguards are used, people are afraid of contracting diseases such as AIDS and hepatitis. Shortages of certain types of blood occur frequently, especially if a catastrophic disaster happens. Some people think the solution to these problems is artificial blood. Researchers have invested hundreds of millions of dollars to develop such a substance. 

The distinction between the extent or the kind of wear that can or cannot be tolerated is a well-established concept in the thinking of practical engineering. The difficulty comes in deciding how much or what kind of wear is catastrophically damaging. The correct analysis of... 

Behind much of the thinking associated with the Do More with Less approach is a feeling that, it cannot happen here. After all, catastrophic events happen so rarely that it is unlikely that a particular manager will actually experience such an event on his or her watch. 

---