Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Casein hydrophobicity

FIG. 1 Primary structure of peptides corresponding to the N-terminal of 23 residues of ttsi-casein. Hydrophobic amino acids are shown by closed circles, hydrophilic charged amino acids by open circles, and hydrophilic uncharged amino acids by shaded... [Pg.125]

The enzymatic hydrolysates of milk casein and soy protein sometimes have a strong bitter taste. The bitter taste is frequently developed by pepsin [9001 -75-6] chymotrypsin [9004-07-3] and some neutral proteases and accounted for by the existence of peptides that have a hydrophobic amino acid in the carboxyhc terminal (226). The relation between bitter taste and amino acid constitution has been discussed (227). [Pg.296]

Soybean Protein Isolates. Soybean protein isolates, having a protein content of >90 wt%, are the only vegetable proteins that are widely used in imitation dairy products (1). Most isolates are derived from isoelectric precipitation, so that the soybean protein isolates have properties that are similar to those of casein. They are insoluble at thek isoelectric point, have a relatively high proportion of hydrophobic amino acid residues, and are calcium-sensitive. They differ from casein in that they are heat-denaturable and thus heat-labile. The proteins have relatively good nutritional properties and have been increasingly used as a principal source of protein. A main deterrent to use has been the beany flavor associated with the product. Use is expected to increase in part because of lower cost as compared to caseinates. There has been much research to develop improved soybean protein isolates. [Pg.442]

All the described properties of such a s-fraction of poly(NVCl-co-NVIAz) synthesized at the temperature above the PST of the reacting system allowed us to draw the conclusion that the chains of this type had the comonomer sequence, which at the temperatures above the conformation transition facilitated the formation of polymer particles, where H-blocks are in the interior shielded by the P-blocks against additional intermolecular association. Such a behaviour of this copolymer in aqueous media is close to that of oligomeric proteins similar to casein [46] possessing a rather hydrophobic core surrounded by the polar segments. [Pg.129]

Avseenko et al. (2001) immobilized antigens onto aluminum-coated Mylar films by electrospray (ES) deposition. Various surface modifications of the metallized films were studied to determine their abilities to enhance sensitivity. The plastic surfaces were firsf cleaned by plasma discharge treatment, followed by coating with proteins (BSA and casein) or polymers such as poly (methyl methacrylate) or oxidized dextran, or they were exposed to dichlorodimethyl silane to create hydrophobic surfaces. Protein antigen was prepared in 10-fold excess sucrose and sprayed onto the surfaces to form arrays with spot diameters between 7 and 15 pm containing 1 to 4 pg protein. [Pg.208]

No cysteine residues are found for alpha(sl) and P-caseins do. If any S-S bonds occur within the micelle, they are not the driving force for stabilization. Caseins are among the most hydrophobic proteins, and there is some evidence to suggest that they play a role in the stability of the micelle. It must be remembered that hydrophobic interactions are very temperature sensitive. [Pg.206]

The electronic property of the amino acid on the C-terminus also has an effect on antioxidant activity (Li et al., 2011), that is, the larger the electronic property, the higher is the activity. The C-terminus is a polar position that is thus affected by its electrostatic potential, to some extent therefore, the amino acids Trp, Glu, Leu, lie, Met, Val, Tyr, etc. are suitable at the C-terminus. Some researchers have speculated that the identity of the amino acid on the C-terminus would play an important role in its activity. Suetsuna (2000) separated and identified a radical scavenging peptide, Tyr-Phe-Tyr-Pro-Glu-Leu, from casein hydrolysate, and it was confirmed that the Glu-Leu on the C-terminus mainly contributed to its antioxidant activity. Kim et al. (2009) speculated that the hydrophobic property of the amino acid on the C-terminus, for example, Val and Leu, had a distinct effect on the activity, as determined from the analysis of antioxidative peptides derived from venison hydrolysate. [Pg.78]

Pressure cycling high hydrostatic pressure (e.g., 500 Mpa) induces disintegration of casein micelles and reassociation on pressure reduction Hydrophobic casein particles, formed under pressure, reassociate into smaller and more irregularly shaped aggregates Dickinson 2006a... [Pg.12]

Where this factor plays a role, the hydrophobic interaction between the hydrocarbon chains of the surfactant and the non-polar parts of protein functional groups are predominant. An example of this effect is the marked endothermic character of the interactions between the anionic CITREM and sodium caseinate at pH = 7.2 (Semenova et al., 2006), and also between sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and soy protein at pH values of 7.0 and 8.2 (Nakai et al., 1980). It is important here to note that, when the character of the protein-surfactant interactions is endothermic (/.< ., involving a positive contribution from the enthalpy to the change in the overall free energy of the system), the main thermodynamic driving force is considered to be an increase in the entropy of the system due to release into bulk solution of a great number of water molecules. This entropy... [Pg.178]

Figure 6.8 Sketch of proposed molecular mechanism of protein-surfactant interaction for CITREM + sodium caseinate (0.5 % w/v in aqueous medium (pH = 7.2, ionic strength = 0.05 M) at 293 K. Picture (I) shows the water molecules bound with polar groups of the protein and surfactant, as w ell as w ater molecules structured as a result of hydrophobic hydration around the hydrocarbon chain of the surfactant. (For clarity, the free w ater molecules are not shown.) Picture (H) demonstrates the release of bound and structured water molecules resulting Rom the predominantly hydrophobic interactions between protein and surfactant. Reproduced Rom Semenova et al. (2006) with permission. Figure 6.8 Sketch of proposed molecular mechanism of protein-surfactant interaction for CITREM + sodium caseinate (0.5 % w/v in aqueous medium (pH = 7.2, ionic strength = 0.05 M) at 293 K. Picture (I) shows the water molecules bound with polar groups of the protein and surfactant, as w ell as w ater molecules structured as a result of hydrophobic hydration around the hydrocarbon chain of the surfactant. (For clarity, the free w ater molecules are not shown.) Picture (H) demonstrates the release of bound and structured water molecules resulting Rom the predominantly hydrophobic interactions between protein and surfactant. Reproduced Rom Semenova et al. (2006) with permission.
Hence, from the previously described light-scattering study of caseinate self-assembly in solution, we can postulate that heating/cooling not only alters the nature and strength of the physical (hydrophobic) interactions between emulsion droplets covered by caseinate. It most likely also transforms the nanoscale structural characteristics of the protein network in the bulk and at the interface, thereby affecting the viscoelastic and microstructural properties of the emulsions. [Pg.203]

We have seen earlier in this chapter how the self-assembly of casein systems is sensitively affected by temperature. Another thermodynamic variable that can affect protein-protein interactions in aqueous media is the hydrostatic pressure. Static high-pressure treatment causes the disintegration of casein micelles due to the dismption of internal hydro-phobic interactions and the dissociation of colloidal calcium phosphate. This phenomenon has been used to modify the gelation ability of casein without acidification as a consequence of exposure of hydrophobic parts of the casein molecules into the aqueous medium from the interior of the native casein micelles (Dickinson, 2006). High-pressure treatment leads to a reduction in the casein concentration required for gelation under neutral conditions, especially in the presence of cosolutes such as sucrose (Abbasi and Dickinson, 2001, 2002, 2004 Keenan et al., 2001). [Pg.209]


See other pages where Casein hydrophobicity is mentioned: [Pg.542]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.203]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.464 , Pg.466 ]




SEARCH



Casein micelles hydrophobic bonds

Casein surface hydrophobicity

Hydrophobic bonding, casein micelles

© 2024 chempedia.info