Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Carbonate accumulation factors controlling

Zweifel, U. L. 1999. Factors controlling accumulation of labile dissolved organic carbon in the Gulf of Riga. Eastuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 48 357—370. [Pg.424]

It should be kept in mind that, in spite of these major variations in the CO2-carbonic acid system, virtually all surface seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcite and aragonite. However, variations in the composition of surface waters can have a major influence on the depth at which deep seawater becomes undersaturated with respect to these minerals. The CO2 content of the water is the primary factor controlling its initial saturation state. The productivity and temperature of surface seawater also play major roles, in determining the types and amounts of biogenic carbonates that are produced. Later it will be shown that there is a definite relation between the saturation state of deep seawater, the rain rate of biogenic material and the accumulation of calcium carbonate in deep sea sediments. [Pg.138]

Factors controlling the accumulation of calcium carbonate in deep sea sediments... [Pg.162]

FACTORS CONTROLLING THE ACCUMULATION OF CALCIUM CARBONATE IN DEEP SEA SEDIMENTS... [Pg.163]

Retention of carbon as microbial biomass in combination with active protection as biological carbon stabilization may be an important factor controlling carbon accumulation in soils. [Pg.213]

As indicated above, there is a relationship between particle concentration, equilibrium factor and the amount of highly mobile radioactive particles. Removal of the accumulation mode particles may decrease the decay product exposure, but increase the dose because of the high effectiveness of the "unattached activity in dose deposition. Thus, air cleaning may not succeed in lower risk unless both factors are taken into account. Jonassen explores electrostatic filtration in this context. Finally, design considerations are presented for a possible alternative control system using activated carbon in an alternating bed system. [Pg.12]

Measurements of S cycling in Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin, and Lake Sempach, Switzerland, are used together with literature data to show the major factors regulating S retention and speciation in sediments. Retention of S in sediments is controlled by rates of seston (planktonic S) deposition, sulfate diffusion, and S recycling. Data from 80 lakes suggest that seston deposition is the major source of sedimentary S for approximately 50% of the lakes sulfate diffusion and subsequent reduction dominate in the remainder. Concentrations of sulfate in lake water and carbon deposition rates are important controls on diffusive fluxes. Diffusive fluxes are much lower than rates of sulfate reduction, however. Rates of sulfate reduction in many lakes appear to be limited by rates of sulfide oxidation. Much sulfide oxidation occurs anaerobically, but the pathways and electron acceptors remain unknown. The intrasediment cycle of sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation is rapid relative to rates of S accumulation in sediments. Concentrations and speciation of sulfur in sediments are shown to be sensitive indicators of paleolimnological conditions of salinity, aeration, and eutrophication. [Pg.324]

Modeling experiments allowed us to control for factors that might cause variation in field-based estimates of woody plant age-SOC relationships. Model estimates of SOC accumulation were comparable to field estimates for upland patch types and substantially lower than field estimates for lowland patch types (Table 4). Model estimates of soil N accumulation were substantially lower than field estimates, especially in lowlands. Given that woody patch age explained only 26-68% of the variance in soil C and N content, our field estimates of accumulation rates cannot be taken as definitive. Model results underestimated field observations, especially for N. Reliability of model estimates of soil carbon could likely be improved with a better understanding of how turnover of the substantial root mass (Table 2) might differ among patch types. Model estimates of soil N are likely constrained by lack of information on inputs associated with N, fixation, atmospheric N deposition, translocation between uplands and lowlands, and root turnover. [Pg.124]


See other pages where Carbonate accumulation factors controlling is mentioned: [Pg.351]    [Pg.747]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.4887]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.862]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.862]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.3589]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.633]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.162 , Pg.163 , Pg.164 , Pg.165 , Pg.166 , Pg.167 , Pg.168 , Pg.169 , Pg.170 , Pg.171 ]




SEARCH



Accumulation control

Accumulation factor

Carbon accumulation

Carbon factor

Carbonate accumulation

Control accumulator

Control factors

Controllable factors

Controlled factor

Controlling factors

Factors Controlling the Accumulation of Calcium Carbonate in Deep Sea Sediments

© 2024 chempedia.info