Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Carbon counting

Estimated precision in the chemical shifts is 0.05 p.p.m. The chemical shifts are given relative to external 1,4-dioxane, which was introduced into some samples only to obtain chemical shifts. Spectra obtained at 258 for — 10% solutions. Spectra of compounds were obtained at 22.5 MHz see Ref. 20. Spectra of compounds were obtained at 22.5 MHz see Ref. 24.J Spectrum obtained at 100.6 MHz see Ref. 24. Data taken from Ref. 61. Chemical shifts for GalNAc only are given. The data given in the parentheses for compounds 51 and 32 refer to the carbon count. [Pg.36]

Tables are organized by the functional group classes undergoing change in the substrates. Table entries are ordered by increasing carbon count of the starting substrate. Protecting groups are included in the carbon count. Unspecified yields are denoted by (—). Tables are organized by the functional group classes undergoing change in the substrates. Table entries are ordered by increasing carbon count of the starting substrate. Protecting groups are included in the carbon count. Unspecified yields are denoted by (—).
The most frequently used combination of radioisotopes in double labeling experiments is tritium and 14C. Ideally the ratio of the activities in the corresponding channels (Fig. 7.16) should to be high enough to insure the carbon counts in the tritium channel are negligible compared to tritium counts. Usually this is not achieved and a correction must be applied. [Pg.234]

The process calls for feeding ethylene and mixed butylenes to the bottom of a reactor. The mixed butylenes consist of both butene-1 and butene-2. (Refer to Figure 1—10 to refresh your memory about the difference.) A slurry of rhenium-based catalyst is introduced at the top. As the ethylene and butylenes bubble past the catalyst, the ethylene and butene-2 will react to form propylene (the carbon count is right). Simultaneously, as the butene-2 is consumed, butene-1 isomerizes to create more. [Pg.78]

Properties and handling. Typical properties for the alpha olefins produced by ethylene oligomerization are given in Table 21-4. You can find in the table that as the carbon count increases, purity declines. The impurities are branched chains and internal olefins (beta, gamma, etc.) These variations have more opportunity to form as the molecules get longer—Murphys Third Law in operation again. [Pg.310]

Alpha olefins are straight-chain olefins that have a double bond in the number one (alpha) carbon-carbon position. Because they are now made by linldng ethylene molecules together, alpha olefins have only even-number carbon counts. Alpha olefins with 4, 6, 8, to 30 or more are commercially available. [Pg.312]

Why are there only even-number carbon count alpha olefins any more ... [Pg.313]

In the Ziegler process, why do you think there is a distribution of different carbon count alpha olefins rather than just one ... [Pg.313]

Because the addition is done by adding ethylene, the carbon count in. that comes in two s. [Pg.433]

Parameters other than simple carbon counts for substituents at the 5-position of the dione ring and the size of the ester chain were examined in preliminary studies. For example,... [Pg.324]

Charton s steric parameter, v,(5) was examined as an alternative to DICARB for bulk at Ri and R2 Eiraryl, for the substituents on the aryl ring. Preliminary regression equation results achieved using such alternatives were similar but not superior to those outlined below the carbon counts for DICARB and ESCARB have the further advantage of conceptual simplicity and computational accuracy. [Pg.324]

As illustrated in Figure 2A, and as was true for Equations 1 and 2, the DICARB and ESCARB functions for Equations 3 and 4 describe, respectively, precipitous and flat parabolas having the optima cited in Table V. The DICARB curves clearly document the superiority of carbon counts near 2.5 over compounds having fewer... [Pg.331]

Figure 2. Potency vs. carbon count functions. (A) DICARB and ESCARB functions for Phase I mite (Eq. 3) and egg (Eq. 4) (B) Schematic illustration of underprediction for Phase I DICARB quadratic functions outside Phase I range in DICARB (C) Phase II DICARB functions vs. Phase I DICARB functions. Figure 2. Potency vs. carbon count functions. (A) DICARB and ESCARB functions for Phase I mite (Eq. 3) and egg (Eq. 4) (B) Schematic illustration of underprediction for Phase I DICARB quadratic functions outside Phase I range in DICARB (C) Phase II DICARB functions vs. Phase I DICARB functions.
Two technical questions naturally arise (i) are all the carbons counted and (ii) what limits resolution In liquids all carbons are represented provided that the repetition period is substantially longer than the longest carbon T c Resolution is generally restricted by static field inhomogeneity or by lifetime broadening. Circumstances in solids are less clearcut. [Pg.72]

Tetra(n-alkyl) phosphonium iodide Carbon Count M.W. M.P. (X) Solubility in Octane... [Pg.330]

Although less abundant there is also a significant number of ions which have four heteroatoms, one sulfur and three oxygens. The main series of peaks are at HD = 9 and 14. The first group is quite typical while the second starts at a relatively high carbon count which may be an example of a combination of aromatics as previously described. Finally, a small number of ions were observed to have one of each heteroatom. Structural assignments would be very speculative at this time. [Pg.260]

A second group is coal which is seen to have much higher carbon intensity than the liquid or gaseous fuels. Coal is often used by power generation operations associated with petrochemical operations. This power is often purchased from a third party and on a global basis should be counted if power is imported. However, at the present time this type of carbon counting is not demanded by many jurisdictions leaving the... [Pg.118]

In the more than 30 years that have followed, radiocarbon studies have evolved through two generations of instrumental methods. Libby employed solid carbon counting (combined with an application of the anticoincidence principle to reduce background count rate) to establish the fundamental validity of the method (6). This goal was achieved in December 1949 with the publication of the famous Curve of Knowns, which demonstrated that the residual content of a series of samples was directly related to their age (7). [Pg.334]

Identification Sample Sample Size (mg carbon) Counting Mode Measured ratio (R) Radiocarbon Age years B.P.)... [Pg.344]

Next, total the number of each type of carbon and compare these numbers to those for the parent or other relevant related structure. Remember that NMR detects only magnetically inequivalent species, so when counting carbons in the parent structure, be sure to count all magnetically equivalent carbons as only one unique carbon entity. The differences in carbon counts between the impurity and the parent will point out any obvious changes from the parent. These numbers may also be compared with... [Pg.325]


See other pages where Carbon counting is mentioned: [Pg.111]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.888]    [Pg.899]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.2290]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.434]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info