Calibration qualitative standard

The use of NIR for homogeneity determination does not necessarily require the development of a calibration model. The previously described method could be applied to any mixture without the extensive preliminary work of building a quantitative calibration as required for most NIR work. On the other hand, homogeneity determinations could be carried out by using either quantitative or qualitative calibrations. Quantitative calibrations involve prediction of the drug level at various locations or times with an appropriate calibration. The standard deviation of multiple potency determinations may be used to estimate homogeneity. 

As XRF is not an absolute but a comparative method, sensitivity factors are needed, which differ for each spectrometer geometry. For quantification, matrix-matched standards or matrix-correction calculations are necessary. Quantitative XRF makes ample use of calibration standards (now available with the calibrating power of some 200 international reference materials). Table 8.41 shows the quantitative procedures commonly employed in XRF analysis. Quantitation is more difficult for the determination of a single element in an unknown than in a known matrix, and is most complex for all elements in an unknown matrix. In the latter case, full qualitative analysis is required before any attempt is made to quantitate the matrix elements. 

Selectivity. In general, selectivity of analytical multicomponent systems can be expressed qualitatively (Vessman et al. [2001]) and estimated quantitatively according to a statement of Kaiser [1972] and advanced models (Danzer [2001]). In multivariate calibration, selectivity is mostly quantified by the condition number see Eqs. (6.80)-(6.82). Unfortunately, the condition number does not consider the concentrations of the species and gives therefore only an aid to orientation of maximum expectable analytical errors. Inclusion of the concentrations of calibration standards into selectivity models makes it possible to derive multivariate limits of detection. 

One of the simplest techniques is PGC in which the gases, resulting from the pyrolysis of a polymer, are analyzed by gas chromatography. This technique may be used for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The latter requires calibration with known amounts of a standard polymer pyrolyzed under the same conditions as the unknown. 

In the past these tests were rather qualitative and one of the chief disadvantages was the lack of knowledge of the pressure transmitted to the acceptor. With the advent of calibration, however, the significance of gap tests was greatly increased. After discussing briefly the work on calibration done by various scientists between the years 1949 1965. Liddiard Price stated that the purpose of their work was to use the improved experimental and data reduction techniques developed in the few years prior to 1965 in order to obtain a calibration with the best data available. The report describes two test assemblies "NOL Standardized Gap Test [Fig 1(A)land "Modified Gap Test [Fig 1(B)]. The "Standardized Test , also known as "LSGT (Large Scale Gap Test), is described in Refs 48 54. For description of "NOL Modified Test , see Refs 59 68 Other modification developed at NOL is described in Ref 52... 

The setup of a calibration curve is not always feasible because pure standards of many clinically significant organic acids are not available commercially. This limitation underscores the importance of qualitative profile interpretation as the primary means by which to report organic acid results in clinical practice, rather than generating extensive lists of quantitative measurements of individual analytes. 

FTIR (refer to Figure 11) is commonly used for qualitative identification of various functionalities. For quantitative analysis, FTIR requires the use of well characterized standards. NMR spectroscopy is typically used to characterize a set of samples which are then used as standards for the FTIR calibration. 

For qualitative screening, a visual comparison of color with standards can be made. For semiquantitative determination, however, a spectrophotometer should be used to read absorbance to plot a calibration standard curve. The color should be read as soon as possible because it becomes unstable after 30 min. The required period for incubation varies from substance to substance but can range from 5 to 10 min to 1 or 2 hours. In certain analysis, the immunochemical reaction may require quenching after a specific amount of time. The reaction can be stopped by adding an acid, such as 1 N HC1, which turns the blue to yellow. The intensity of yellow too can be measured to determine the analyte concentration in the sample. 

The confirmation of pesticides by GC/MS should be more reliable than that on the GC-ECD using an alternate column. Presence of stray interference peaks, even after sample cleanup, and the retention time shift and coelution problem, often necessitate the use of GC/MS in compounds identification If a quantitative estimation is to be performed, select the primary ion or one of the major characteristic ions of the compounds and compare the area response of this ion to that in the calibration standard. Quantitation, however, is generally done from the GC-ECD analysis, because ECD exhibits a much greater sensitivity than the mass selective detector (MSD). For example, while ECD is sensitive to 0.01 ng dieldrin, the lowest MSD detection for the same compound is in the range of 1 ng. The primary and secondary characteristic ions for qualitative identification and quantitation are presented in Table 2.20.3. The data presented are obtained under MS conditions utilizing 70 V (nominal) electron energy under electron impact ionization mode. 

Qualitative compound confirmation may be performed either with a second column or with a second detector. Second column confirmation technique consists of analyzing the sample on two columns with dissimilar polarities. Each column is calibrated with the same standards, and the same calibration acceptance criteria are applied. For the presence of a compound to be confirmed, its retention time values obtained from each column must fall into respective retention time windows. If a peak falls within the retention time window on one column, but not on the second column, the compound is not considered confirmed and should not be reported. 

Infrared Spectrometers. Infrared spectroscopy is one of the most powerful tools for quantitative and qualitative identification of molecules, and this led to the early development of prism and grating spectrophotometers. Typically, these instruments cover the region from 400 to 4000 cm, give a resolution of 1 to 4 cm, and require calibration with polystyrene films or with standard gases such as H2O, CO2, CH4, or This al-... 

---