Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Calculation of the reaction order

The strategy for the analysis of the data is calculation of the reaction order ( ), calculation of the enthalpy change (Aff) and calculation of the rate constant [Pg.957]

The values for r, and tj can then be normalised to t = 0 by subtraction of the time value that corresponds to this initial power value. For example, if Aq/At is 94% of the initial calorimetric signal and dqr/d/j is 4% of the initial calorimetric signal then the tft constant will be about 52 for a first order reaction, 127 for a second order reaction and 156 for a 2.5 order reaction, etc. In practice, the analysis should be performed using a mathematical algorithm in a spread sheet, such as Mathcad [57]. The analysis can be set up to perform a calculation for every data point in the data set and the statistical evaluation made. [Pg.957]


Fig.IF Calculation of the reaction order from the Tafel plots, a) Tafel lines for a series of concentrations of the electroactive jr species, b) Reaction-order plots derived from (a) for different... Fig.IF Calculation of the reaction order from the Tafel plots, a) Tafel lines for a series of concentrations of the electroactive jr species, b) Reaction-order plots derived from (a) for different...
Plotting dx/dt ersas (1-x) results in aline with a slope equal to the reaction order. The stepwise approach allows the calculation of the reaction order for each step of the multiple step decomposition from a single TG experiment. ( 1... [Pg.21]

Analysis of the variation of the overall rate constant of reaction with [surfactant] was discussed in Section 3 (p. 222) and the treatment allows calculation of the second-order rate constants of reaction in the micellar pseudophase. These rate constants can be compared with second-order rate constants in water provided that both constants are expressed in the same dimensions and typically the units are M-1 s-1. Inevitably the comparison... [Pg.251]

The pX,-value is estimated in order to allow the calculation of the first order rate constant for cyclization of the anion from k0H, and the reference reaction is the attack of methoxide ion on phenyl acetate (Bender and Glasson, 1959)... [Pg.246]

In order to obtain insight into possible reaction mechanisms, DFT calculations of the reaction of Co, Fe, and other transition metal atoms with the porphyrin molecule (2HP) were performed (113). [Pg.274]

CALCULATION OF THE SECOND-ORDER RATE COEFFICIENT, kj, FOR REACTION (17)... [Pg.162]

A reaction sequence analogous to that in Eq. 4.40 can also be developed for the specific adsorption of bivalent metal cations (e.g., Cu2+, Mn2 or Pb2+) by metal oxyhydroxides.21 In this application the abstract scenario in the first row of Table 4.3 is realized with A = =Al-OH, B = M2+, C = =Al-OH - - M2+, D = = Al-OM+, and E = H where M is the metal complexed by an OH group on the surface of an aluminum oxyhydroxide. Analysis of pressure-pulse relaxation kinetics data leads to a calculation of the second-order rate coefficient kf, under the assumption that the first step in the sequence in Eq. 4.40 is rate determining. Like k(l, the rate coefficient for the dissolution of a metal-containing solid (Section 3.1 cf. Fig. 3.4), measured values of k, correlate positively in a log log plot with kw,. , the rate coefficient for water exchange on the metal... [Pg.155]

Table 14 shows the calculation of the reaction rate, the time law, and the half-life depending on the reaction s order. The order results from the sum of the exponents of the concentrations. The number does not necessarily have to be an integer. The half-life states in which time half of the reactants is converted into the products. Reaction rate constants k are 1012 to 10"11 L/s for first order reactions and 1010 to 10"11 L/(mol s) for second order reactions. [Pg.52]

The time to vitrification, as a function of reaction temperature, can now be solved for each of the three cases considered. The only case for which experimental data are available for t j, is the nonlinear step growth case. Combining Eqs. (13)-(16), (19), and those relating the crosslink dmsity to p, results in the plot of T vs. tyj, shown in Fig. 16. The system used was the same one used in Fig. IS. Different values of the reaction order (n) were used in Fig. 16. The value of k obtained for n = 1 was used for all values of n. The fit is not entirely satisfactory, but the lack of an accurate kinetic model mitigates against a good fit. The calculated time to vitrification curve is S-shaped, as is seen experimentally. [Pg.106]

The contributions of Nicholson, Saveant, and Shain are particularly noteworthy (MacDonald, 1977). In carrying out the theoretical calculations it has has been customary to deal with each individual mechanism separately and make a detailed analysis in each case as was outlined in an earlier section. As a consequence of this approach, the origin of the response to a particular mechanism went undetected until recently. It is now apparent that the response is a direct consequence of the reaction orders of all of the species involved in the reaction mechanism (Parker, 198If). [Pg.169]

It should be pointed out that all of the rate expressions were derived using the steady state approximation on an appropriate intermediate and represent limiting cases of the complete rate laws. These approximations are always used in the theoretical calculations, but the reaction order approach does not require such approximations since experimental data are treated directly. [Pg.196]

To calculate p, the reaction order at constant overpotential, we substitute = -i-Tiin Eq. 3 IF and express the reversible potential in terms of the Nemst equation, namely ... [Pg.396]

The kinetic parameters for the n order kinetic model have been obtained using these definitions of reactivity for the pure steam gasification experiments of birch. All the activation energies lie between 228-238 kJ/mol and the reaction orders between 0.54 and 0.58, apart from definition 3. The frequency factors are somewhat more scattered, lying between 5-10 and 3-10 . Regarding the uncertainty of the calculation, definitions 2, 5 and 4 seem to give more precise results and it is interesting to notice that the error of the reaction order calculation does not depend on how a representative reactivity value is defined. [Pg.43]

However, it is often the case that not all the concentrations which are required for the calculation of the reaction stoichiometry are available. It may be that experimentally it is only practicable to measure the concentration of, say, the reactant A at a series of times subsequent to the reaction being started. In this situation, our only help comes from the initial rate. As before, if the initial rate of disappearance of A is affected by the presence of product and/or is less than the rate observed somewhat later in the reaction, we know immediately that the more complicated expressions are required. The converse observations, however, do not necessarily imply that the rate can be represented by the simple equation, (1). In those cases where the preliminary examination of the data indicates that the maximum rate occurs at zero time and is unaffected by the presence of product, the data are examined on the basis of eqn. (1) first if inconsistent rate coefficients are found together with non-simple orders, the data are then re-examined on the basis of the more complicated expressions. This same procedure is adopted when the data consist of a series of concentrations and times but where, for experimental reasons, the early concentration-time values are either unobtainable or sufficiently unreliable as to preclude any reasonable estimates of the initial rate being made the data are examined on the basis of the simple expression first and in the event of inconsistencies re-examined on the basis of the more complicated expressions. It should be clear that improvements in the experimental technique designed to reduce the uncertainties in the initial rates can more than repay the effort involved. [Pg.347]

Vyazovkin and Lesnikovich [42] emphasize the need for careful statistical testing of the significance of the calculated parameters. Such tests may, at least, decrease the number of kinetic models which need to be considered. They specifically warn against the practice of forcing the model to be of the reaction order (RO) type where the value of n may not possess physical significance. Coincidence of the parameters calculated by alternative methods confirms only the equivalence of the methods of calculation and not the validity of the parameters obtained. [Pg.167]

The computer enables many innovative techniques for kinetic methods. Some recent error compensation methods do not require prior knowledge of the reaction order for the system employed but instead use a generalized model. Still other methods calculate the model parameters as the data are collected instead of employing batch processing methods. [Pg.899]

Various quantum-mechanical theories have been proposed which allow one to calculate isotopic Arrhenius curves from first principles, where tunneling is included. These theories generally start with an ab initio calculation of the reaction surface and use either quantum or statistical rate theories in order to calculate rate constants and kinetic isotope effects. Among these are the variational transition state theory of Truhlar [15], the instanton approach of Smedarchina et al. [Pg.137]

Figure 6 illustrates the effect of the reaction order on the LO curve. The zero-order rate expression, r = k (T), used in the figure is derived from (1) and (2) assuming that the mole fractions of CO and O2 are those at the inlet of the catalyst beof and that tlie adsorption constant is calculated at the inlet gas temperature Tq ... [Pg.61]

These reactions were studied in excess of hydrazine, and were pseudo-first order in complex. At constant pH, the plots of the rate constants (s ) against the concentration of hydrazine were linear, allowing for the calculation of the second-order rate constant, N2H4 = 0.43 M s (25 °C, pH 10), with = 26.8 0.2 kJ mol A = —163 5 J mol The plot of n2H4 against pH (Fig. 12,... [Pg.89]

The onset temperature, and the temperature and kinetic data of the first oxidation peak maximum are the criteria which define the practical behavior of bitumens in its applications. Calculation of the reaction rate constants and of the half-life time using the Arrhenius coefficients gives values, which may be reproduced by other methods, although the oxidation does not obey the first order reaction law. The plot of the log versus the inverse Kelvin temperature (1 000/T) is shown in Fig. 4-78. Corresponding graphs for the other peaks show the increase in the half-life times. However, they are only of theoretical interest and do not have any relevance to practical behavior in production and manufacturing. Fig. 4-78 and Table 4-102 show that oxidation commences at temperatures... [Pg.254]

A many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) approach has been combined with the polarizable continuum model (PCM) of the electrostatic solvation. The first approximation called by authors the perturbation theory at energy level (PTE) consists of the solution of the PCM problem at the Hartree-Fock level to find the solvent reaction potential and the wavefunction for the calculation of the MBPT correction to the energy. In the second approximation, called the perturbation theory at the density matrix level only (PTD), the calculation of the reaction potential and electrostatic free energy is based on the MBPT corrected wavefunction for the isolated molecule. At the next approximation (perturbation theory at the energy and density matrix level, PTED), both the energy and the wave function are solvent reaction field and MBPT corrected. The self-consistent reaction field model has been also applied within the complete active space self-consistent field (CAS SCF) theory and the eomplete aetive space second-order perturbation theory. ... [Pg.671]

If we compare the values of Xa calculated by Eqs. (4.10.19), (4.10.20), (4.10.25) and (4.10.26) for a given value of Da, we see that for a positive reaction order the conversion in a PFR is always higher than in a CSTR (see also Section 4.10.2.7). This effect can also be explained without any mathematics The mean concentration in a PFR is somewhere between the in- and outlet value, whereas in a CSTR we have a constant but always lower reactor concentration that equals the outlet concentration. Thus for a positive value of the reaction order, the mean reaction rate in a PFR is higher. For a zero-order the difference in the reaction rate vanishes, and only for the rare case of a negative reaction order is the CSTR superior to a PFR. [Pg.309]

This integral can be calculated for any given value of the reaction order n. [Pg.31]


See other pages where Calculation of the reaction order is mentioned: [Pg.957]    [Pg.957]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.123]   


SEARCH



Calculation order

Calculations reactions

Order of reaction

Order of reaction, calculation

© 2024 chempedia.info