Calcium channel blockers gastrointestinal effects

Most types of smooth muscle are dependent on transmembrane calcium influx for normal resting tone and contractile responses. These cells are relaxed by the calcium channel blockers (Figure 12-3). Vascular smooth muscle appears to be the most sensitive, but similar relaxation can be shown for bronchiolar, gastrointestinal, and uterine smooth muscle. In the vascular system, arterioles appear to be more sensitive than veins orthostatic hypotension is not a common adverse effect. Blood pressure is reduced with all calcium channel blockers. Women may be more sensitive than men to the hypotensive action of diltiazem. The reduction in peripheral vascular resistance is one mechanism by which these agents may benefit the patient with angina of effort. Reduction of coronary artery tone has been demonstrated in patients with variant angina. 

So-called bradycardic drugs, relatively selective If sodium channel blockers (eg, ivabradine), reduce cardiac rate by inhibiting the hyperpolarization-activated sodium channel in the sinoatrial node. No other significant hemodynamic effects have been reported. Ivabradine appears to reduce anginal attacks with an efficacy similar to that of calcium channel blockers and 3 blockers. The lack of effect on gastrointestinal and bronchial smooth muscle is an advantage of ivabradine, and FDA approval is expected. 

Glucagon has also been used to stimulate insulin and C-peptide secretion, to see whether the islets still produce insulin, as a stimulatory test during pheochromocytoma, hyperinsulinism, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, or as an additive in upper gastrointestinal X-ray investigations (0.5-1 mg). It has been used in myocardial infarction, although its inotropic effects may present a risk. It has also been used to treat overdoses with beta-blockers (3) and calcium channel blockers (4), although its efficacy in such cases has only been demonstrated in animals (5) and to treat overdose with tricyclic antidepressants (6,7). 

Because of effects on smooth muscle, the calcium channel blockers (particularly verapamil (96) but also diltiazem) can cause constipation. This may be due to colonic motor activity inhibition (97). Gastroesophageal reflux can also occur, and the calcium channel blockers should be avoided in patients with symptoms suggestive of reflux esophagitis (98). Calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem, and nifedipine) can also be associated with an increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding, as reported in a prospective cohort study in 1636 older hypertensives, with a relative risk of 1.86 (95% Cl = 1.22, 2.82) compared with beta-blockers (7). However, this finding was not confirmed in other retrospective studies (13,99,100). 

---