Bulk conductivity metal method

Figure 9 compares the two methods for making bulk conductivity measurements on conductive base paper the pressurized stainless steel electrode method and the Ga-In eutectic liquid metal method. The conductivity is plotted as a function of voltage at 50% RH. For the stainless steel electrodes, at 2000 psi (13.8 MPa), the measured current is a superlinear function of voltage and a strong function of time 16), up to a voltage of approximately 10V. With the Ga-In electrodes this effect is noticeable only for applied potentials up to approximately 3V. Between 10 and 50V, the bulk conductivity measured by both methods is essentially independent of voltage, and the current traces are reproducible and show no time dependence. 

Analysis of refined germanium products is done in a wide variety of ways, including several methods that have become ASTM standards (47). Electronic-grade Ge02 is analyzed using an emission spectrograph to determine its spectrographic purity. Its volatile content is measured in accord with ASTM F5 and its bulk density with F6. Other ASTM standards cover the preparation of a metal biHet from a sample of the oxide (F27), and the determination of the conductivity type (F42) and resistivity (F43) of the biHet. 

The application of SIMS, SNMS, SSMS and GDMS in quantitative trace analysis for conducting bulk material is restricted to matrices where standard reference materials (SRMs) are available. For quantification purposes, the well characterized multi-element SRMs (e.g., from NIST) are useful. In Table 9.5 the results of the analysis by SNMS and the RSCs (relative sensitivity coefficients) for different elements in a low alloy steel standard (NBS 467) are compared with those of SSMS. Both solid-state mass spectrometric techniques with high vacuum ion sources allow the determination of light non-metals such as C, N, and P in steel, and the RSCs for the elements measured vary from 0.5 to 3 (except C). RSCs are applied as a correction factor in the analytical method used to obtain... 

Issa et al. [9] used various metal ions for the volumetric determination of mefenamic acid. Mefenamic acid was precipitated from its neutral alcoholic solution by a standard solution of either silver nitrate, mercurous acetate, or potassium aluminum sulfate. In the argentimetric procedure, residual Ag(I) was titrated with standard NH4SCN. With Hg(OAc)2 or potash alum, the residual metal was determined by adding EDTA and conducting back titration of excess of EDTA with standard Pb(N03)2 using xylenol orange indicator. The applied methods were used for the determination in bulk drug substance, and in its formulations. 

The Rb based on the sample cannot be calculated correctly, since the electric charge transfer resistance and the electric double layer in an electrode interface are also detected as a resistance, even if bias voltage is impressed to the measurement cell in order to measure the ionic conductivity. For the ionic conductivity measurement, a dc four-probe method, or the complex-impedance method, is used to separate sample bulk and electrode interface [4]. In particular, the complex-impedance method has the advantage that it can be performed with both nonblocking electrodes (the same element for carrier ion and metal M) and blocking electrodes (usually platinum and stainless steel were used where charge cannot be transferred between the electrode and carrier ions). The two-probe cell, where the sample is sandwiched between two pohshed and washed parallel flat electrodes, is used in the ionic conductivity measurement by complex-impedance method as shown in Figure 6.1. 

---