Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Bubble electrolytic current density

The high current density requirement means that the bubbles must be moved out of the way so that current can pass from the electrolyte into the anode base. The vertical channels/grooves in the anode face provide a low-energy path for the bubbles to move from the surface to the vapor space and exit the cell. [Pg.539]

Janssen and Hoogland (J3, J4a) made an extensive study of mass transfer during gas evolution at vertical and horizontal electrodes. Hydrogen, oxygen, and chlorine evolution were visually recorded and mass-transfer rates measured. The mass-transfer rate and its dependence on the current density, that is, the gas evolution rate, were found to depend strongly on the nature of the gas evolved and the pH of the electrolytic solution, and only slightly on the position of the electrode. It was concluded that the rate of flow of solution in a thin layer near the electrode, much smaller than the bubble diameter, determines the mass-transfer rate. This flow is affected in turn by the incidence and frequency of bubble formation and detachment. However, in this study the mass-transfer rates could not be correlated with the square root of the free-bubble diameter as in the surface renewal theory proposed by Ibl (18). [Pg.276]

Melhylpentanoyl chloride (26.8 g) was dissolved in anhyd HF (I L) in a cell. The evolution of gas (presumed to be HC1) was observed. Then the electrolysis was carried out with an anodic current density of 3.5 A dm 2, a cell temperature of 5-6 C, and a cell voltage of 6.4-6.8 V. Helium (ca. 100 mL min ) was bubbled from the bottom of the cell in order to agitate the electrolyte during fluorination. The operation was continued until the voltage reached 10 V. The total load passed was 507.6 kC in a period of 250 min. [Pg.313]

On electrolysis the gas is evolved only at the outer side in the inner space between the plates the electrolyte without bubbles sinks to the bottom due to its higher specific gravity and is raised once again by gas bubbles evolved at the outer side. The electrolyte, after most of the gases have been separated, flows back into the space between both plates. Owing to this spontaneous circulation the quantity of gases remaining in the electrolyte is less than in the previous case which makes it possible to increase the current density to 4—5 A/sq. dm. [Pg.209]

The voltage necessary to overcome resistance of the electrolyte is proportional to the current density, the distance between electrodes and the specific resistance of the solution. Resistance of an electrolyte decreases with increasing temperature. A small amount of chlorine bubbles in the anolyte will have no noticeable influence upon the resistance. [Pg.245]

The general electrochemical procedure for the carbon dioxide incorporation was based on the use of one-compartment cells fitted with consumable anodes of magnesium or zinc [12]. Electrocarboxylations were carried out in DMF at constant current density, using tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate (10 2 m) as supporting electrolyte. The catalyst was introduced in a 10% molar ratio with respect to the substrate and carbon dioxide was bubbled through the solution at atmospheric pressure. Electrolyses were generally run at room temperature and reactions were stopped when starting material was consumed or when the faradaic yield attained 30%. [Pg.214]

Many effects of gas bubbles released at electrodes (on electrolyte flow, mass and heat transport, conduction, etc.) have been well studied in the past. A text with an extensive treatment of this topic is that of Hine [38]. However, in Hall-Heroult cells these effects are worthy of special mention because the relatively high current density, of the order of 1 A cm-2, and temperature make the volumetric gas evolution rate from the anode large. Furthermore, difficulties of measurement on actual cells mean less knowledge of these effects than in many other electrochemical cells. Finally, one effect of the bubble is to make the task difficult in reducing the enormous... [Pg.242]

Figure 5. Partial current density of HCOO formation jc vs. electrode potential from reduction of HCO3 with a Hg pool electrode with (o) and without ( ) N2 bubbled. Electrolyte NallCO (m = 1.0 mol kg b- NaiCOs (m = 0.05 mol kg ). The potential axis negative to the right. Reprinted from Ref. 47, Copyright (1983) with permission from the Electrochemical Society. Figure 5. Partial current density of HCOO formation jc vs. electrode potential from reduction of HCO3 with a Hg pool electrode with (o) and without ( ) N2 bubbled. Electrolyte NallCO (m = 1.0 mol kg b- NaiCOs (m = 0.05 mol kg ). The potential axis negative to the right. Reprinted from Ref. 47, Copyright (1983) with permission from the Electrochemical Society.
The detachment of the bubble occurs if the condition FB = Fc is satisfied. It follows that the mean bubble departure radius (Rd) is well defined for a given electrode—electrolyte configuration (typical values are around 50 pm [115]). It may be expected that the mean bubble departure radius is mainly a property of the electrode (the electrode surface roughness which influences D), the electrode wettability (through the contact angle i9), and the electrolyte (density and surface tension of the electrolyte), but not of the current density j. However, the question is whether a cavity (nucleation site) is active or non-active. The current density may influence the activation of the nucleation sites. [Pg.46]

Actually, many external parameters influence the bubble diameter distribution such as concentration, pH of the electrolyte, polarity and potential of the electrode, wetting conditions, and the current density [115]. [Pg.46]

The nucleation process starts at defined active centers of the surface called the nucleation sites. Even in the case of an electrolyte supersaturated with gas the activation of the nucleation site is required. It depends not only on the nature of the gas and the electrolyte but also on the interfacial tension and number of substrate neighbors on the electrocatalyst. In summary, the existence of a gas-electrolyte interface besides the electrolyte-solid interface is required. Some authors explained this process as nucleate boiling [73] and others [74] as the super saturation of the electrolyte with the gas, developing different equations for the current density. Another important factor to consider is the number of surface active sites available for the bubble formation and the geometry of the bubble. Moreover, the surface roughness is certainly a factor to be considered for the stability of the nucleation site. The ageing of the nucleation site also has to be considered since it results in the loss of activity after a long time. [Pg.331]

The effect of mass and heat transfer associated with the problem of the bubble evolution is also very interesting. In the case of mass transport, we can assume that at a given current density, or flux, N number of the adsorbed bubbles can be formed. At a given time tR, the diameter reaches a critical value rh after which it breaks off. We assume that the fresh electrolyte arrives at a similar concentration of that of the bulk, especially when the convective flux is large enough. We also consider that the mass transport is rate determining, so when the new electrolyte arrives it rapidly converts into the product. Under this consideration, it follows the second Fick s law ... [Pg.340]


See other pages where Bubble electrolytic current density is mentioned: [Pg.1450]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.606]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.38 ]




SEARCH



Current electrolytic

Electrolyte density

© 2024 chempedia.info