Bubble collapse illustration

The erosion effects of cavitation on solid surfaces have been extensively investigated both in terms of surface erosion [68] and corrosion [69]. The consequences of these effects on metal reactivity are important since passivating coatings are frequently present on a metal surface (e. g. oxides, carbonates and hydroxides) and can be removed by the impacts caused by collapsing cavitation bubbles. An illustration can be found with the activation of nickel powder and the determination of the change in its surface composition under the influence of cavitation by Auger spectroscopy (Fig. 3.6) [70]. 

Chemat et al. [14] found the ]oint use of US and microwaves for the treatment of edible oils for the determination of copper to shorten the time taken by this step to about a half that was required in the classical procedure (heating in a Buchi digester) or with microwave assistance, nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide. However, they did not state the specific medium where the microwave-US-assisted method was implemented and assumed US to have mechanical effects only, even though they mentioned a cavitational effect. This is a very common mistake in working with US that is clarified in an extensive discussion by Chanon and Luche [15] of the division of sonochemistry applications into reactions which were the result of true and false effects. Essentially, these terms refer to real chemical effects induced by cavitation and those effects that can be ascribed to the mechanical impact of bubble collapse. The presence of one of these phenomena only has not been demonstrated in the work of Chemat et al. [14] — despite the illustrative figure in their article — so their ascribing the results to purely mechanical effects of US was unwarranted. 

Based on microscopic studies, Swanson [128] proposed that the rising bitumen-coated gas bubbles collapse in the froth layer to yield water droplets dispersed in bitumen, as illustrated in Figure 30. This would produce dispersed gas bubbles with diameters just smaller than the original globules and also small water droplets, formed from the original... 

The radial motion of the bubble was illustrated in Fig. 2. During the main collapse of the bubble, the interior heats up and at the final stages of coUapse, light is emitted. With SBSL, the light emission process may occur each and every acoustic cycle, with a synchronicity better than 1 part per billion for instance, in a 20-kHz sound field (with a period of 50 fis), the light emission can have a jitter of less than 50 ps. 

As an example to illustrate this point consider the effect of applying an acoustic wave of 20 kHz and pressure amplitude 2 atm (P ) to a reaction in water. According to Eq. 2.38, this amplitude will produce a bubble of maximum radius, R ng 1.27 X 10 cm, which if it can be assumed that Pm = Pa + Ph> collapses in approx. 6.8 ps, (Eq. 2.27). This is less than l/5th of a cycle (10 ps), the assumption often... 

All these flow types appear more or less in a series one after the other during the evaporation of a liquid in a vertical tube, as Fig. 4.30 illustrates. The structure of a non-adiabatic vapour-liquid flow normally differs from that of an adiabatic two-phase flow, even when the local flow parameters, like the mass flux, quality, etc. agree with each other. The cause of this are the deviations from thermodynamic equilibrium created by the radial temperature differences, as well as the deviations from hydrodynamic equilibrium. Processes that lead to a change in the flow pattern, such as bubbles coalescing, the dragging of liquid drops in fast flowing vapour, the collapse of drops, and the like, all take time. Therefore, the quicker the evaporation takes place, the further the flow is away from hydrodynamic equilibrium. This means that certain flow patterns are more pronounced in heated than in unheated tubes, and in contrast to this some may possibly not appear at all. 

In P-T projections, the composition axis is collapsed into the pressure-temperature plane. The vapor pressure curve for component A is labeled LV(A) and that for component B is labeled LV(B). These curves terminate at the component critical points (L = V) designated as hollow circles. In Fig. 2, dew pressure and bubble pressure curves for an intermediate composition x intersect at a point on the (L = V) critical locus where the liquid and vapor phases become critically identical. Normally, dew and bubble pressure curves are not shown in projections. They are shown here so that the construction of the related P-x at fixed T, and T-x at fixed P, phase diagrams is clearly illustrated. Each critical point on the critical locus corresponds to a fixed composition. Points close to the critical point of component A are critical points for mixtures with high concentrations of A, whereas points closer to the critical point of... 

Fig. 4.31. An illustration of the graphite cell collapsing around a bubble in tbe graphite foam, driven by ligament thickening and contraction (type I cracking) and facilitated by type II cracks.

---