Breit-Pauli spin-orbital

The Breit-Pauli spin-orbit Hamiltonian is found in many different forms in the literature. In expressions [101] and [102], we have chosen a form in which the connection to the Coulomb potential and the symmetry in the particle indices is apparent. Mostly s written in a short form where spin-same- and spin-other-orbit parts of the two-electron Hamiltonian have been contracted to a single term, either as... 

The Breit-Pauli spin-orbit operator has one major drawback. It implicitly contains terms coupling electronic states (with positive energy) and posi-tronic states (in the negative energy continuum) and is thus unbounded from below. It can be employed safely only in first-order perturbation theory. 

As may be seen by comparing Eqs. [103] and [105], the no-pair spin-orbit Hamiltonian has exactly the same structure as the Breit-Pauli spin-orbit Hamiltonian. It differs from the Breit-Pauli operator only by kinematical factors that damp the 1/rfj and l/r singularities. 

The frozen-core (fc) approach is not restricted to spin-independent electronic interactions the spin-orbit (SO) interaction between core and valence electrons can be expressed by a sum of Coulomb- and exchange-type operators. The matrix element formulas can be derived in a similar way as the Sla-ter-Condon rules.27 Here, it is not important whether the Breit-Pauli spin-orbit operators or their no-pair analogs are employed as these are structurally equivalent. Differences with respect to the Slater-Condon rules occur due to the symmetry properties of the angular momentum operators and because of the presence of the spin-other-orbit interaction. It is easily shown by partial integration that the linear momentum operator p is antisymmetric with respect to orbital exchange, and the same applies to t = r x p. Therefore, spin-orbit... 

For many types of electron spectroscopies there are still comparatively few studies of SOC effects in molecules in contrast to atoms, see, e.g., [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] and references therein. This can probably be referred to complexities in the molecular analysis due to the extra vibrational and rotational degrees of freedom, increased role of many-body interaction, interference and break-down effects in the spectra, but can also be referred to the more difficult nature of the spin-orbit coupling itself in polyatomic species. Modern ab initio formulations, as, e.g., spin-orbit response theory [8] reviewed here, have made such investigations possible using the full Breit-Pauli spin-orbit operator. 

The electronic spin-orbit interaction operator, referred to as the Breit-Pauli spin-orbit Hamiltonian, is given by... 

Semiempirical spin-orbit operators play an important role in all-electron and in REP calculations based on Co wen- Griffin pseudoorbitals. These operators are based on rather severe approximations, but have been shown to give good results in many cases. An alternative is to employ the complete microscopic Breit-Pauli spin-orbit operator, which adds considerably to the complexity of the problem because of the necessity to include two-electron terms. However, it is also inappropriate in heavy-element molecules unless used in the presence of mass-velocity and Darwin terms. 

Since the operators f and f2 occur only at the level of the calculation of the spatial spin-orbit integrals over atomic orbitals, Breit-Pauli spin-orbit coupling operators and DKH spin-orbit coupling operators can be discussed on the same footing as far as their matrix elements between multi-electron wave functions are concerned. These terms constitute, by definition, the spin-orbit interaction part of the operator H+ (Hess etal. 1995). The spin-independent terms characteristic of relativistic kinematics define the scalar relativistic part of the operator, and terms with more than one cr matrix (not considered here) contribute to spin-spin coupling phenomena. 

In order to include the SOC effects, a suitable many-electron Hamiltonian should be introduced. We employed a widely used in calculations Breit-Pauli spin-orbit Hamiltonian ... 

The array of methods in gamess for treating spin-orbit coupling effects has recently been the subject of two reviews [46,47]. These methods include the full Breit-Pauli spin-orbit operator and approximations to it, primarily developed by Koseki and Fedorov. All of the methods require a multi-reference wavefunction as a starting point. This can be MCSCF, first or second order Cl, or MRPT2. The simplest method is a... 

The Breit—Pauli spin-orbit Hamiltonian is very useful for organic molecules when the matrix elements of are computed from the nonrelativistic wave functions using perturbation theory or response theory, but it often overestimates the magnitude of spin-orbit splitting. It also suffers from... 

This version of perturbation theory without exphcit consideration of the excited state wave functions was implemented by Yarkony et al. using the full Breit-Pauli spin-orbit and spin-spin Hamiltomians smd... 

Zimmerman and Kutateladze calculated spin-orbit coupling in linear l,n-diyl biradicals (n = 3 to 8) at the CASSCF(4,4)/3-21G level with the Breit-Pauli spin-orbit Hamiltonian and analyzed it using natural bond orbitals. For diyls with an even number of carbons, symmetry forces zero SOC, whereas for those with an odd number of carbons the main terms have like signs and add, providing a nonvanishing net SOC. The maximum SOC is found at 90° orientation... 

Breit-Pauli spin-orbit coupling operator [101-104] reads in SI units as... 

The matrix elements of the spin-orbit coupling operator have been included in these works using empirically obtained or computed spin-orbit coupling constants for an effective one electron operator. The Breit-Pauli spin-orbit coupling operator (115) with all multi-center terms was employed for the first time by Kiyonaga, Morihashi and Kikuchi [125]. 

First attempts to calculate molecular parity violating potentials within a two-component framework have been undertaken by Kikuchi and coworkers [168,169]. They have added the Breit-Pauli spin-orbit coupling operator Hso to the usual non-relativistic Hamiltonian Hq... 

The disadvantage of this particular two-component realisation is that the full Breit-Pauli spin-orbit coupling operator is not bound from below and therefore critical in a variational procedure. Hence, only relative modest basis sets have been used in the calculations of parity violating effects within this scheme [168,169]. 

The first approximation method for the Breit-Pauli spin-orbit Hamiltonian is to neglect the contribution from the two-electron terms. Justification... 

Model core potential (MCP) methods replace core orbitals by a potential just as in ECP. On the other hand, MCP valence orbitals preserve the nodal structure of valence orbitals, unlike ECP valence orbitals. The expectation values of (r ) for the valence orbitals show that the results of MCP are closer to those calculated with all-electron orbitals when comparing MCP, ECP, and the all electron case. Comparisons between MCP and an all electron basis utilizing the full Breit-Pauli spin-orbit Hamiltonian based on multiconfigura-tional quasidegenerate perturbation theory (MCQDPT) calculations show good agreement between the two methods for hydrides of P, As, and Sb. The MCP based spin-orbit calculation appears to be a promising technique, but systematic studies of many different molecular systems are still needed to assess its characteristics and accuracy. 

A") N2O (X S ) - - O i P) reaction. To do this, they used SA-MCSCF/ SOCI along with DZP and TZP basis sets, in addition to full Breit-Pauli spin-orbit matrix elements. They found that the intersystem crossing of a-N2O2 is efficient, since the MEXP between A and A" is only 1-2 kcal/ mol above the singlet state and the calculated spin-orbit coupling is relatively large (75 cm ). 

---