Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

No-pair spin-orbit Hamiltonian

As may be seen by comparing Eqs. [103] and [105], the no-pair spin-orbit Hamiltonian has exactly the same structure as the Breit-Pauli spin-orbit Hamiltonian. It differs from the Breit-Pauli operator only by kinematical factors that damp the 1/rfj and l/r singularities. [Pg.127]

The no-pair spin-orbit Hamiltonian [105] differs from the corresponding BP terms [103] by momentum dependent factors of the type Ai/(Ej + me2) or (AjAj)/ (Ej+ mec2), where E, and A,- or A - have been defined in [106] and [107], respectively. There are essentially two ways of taking these factors into account. [Pg.161]

The no-pair DCB Hamiltonian (6) is used as a starting point for variational or many-body relativistic calculations [9], The procedure is similar to the nonrelativistic case, with the Hartree-Fock orbitals replaced by the four-component Dirac-Fock-Breit (DFB) functions. The spherical symmetry of atoms leads to the separation of the one-electron equation into radial and spin-angular parts [10], The radial four-spinor has the so-called large component the upper two places and the small component Q, in the lower two. The quantum number k (with k =j+ 1/2) comes from the spin-angular equation, and n is the principal quantum number, which counts the solutions of the radial equation with the same k. Defining... [Pg.163]

A more appropriate spin-orbit coupling Hamiltonian can be derived if electron-positron pair creation processes are excluded right from the beginning (no-pair approximation). After projection on the positive energy states, a variationally stable Hamiltonian is obtained if one avoids expansion in reciprocal powers of c. Instead the Hamiltonian is transformed by properly chosen... [Pg.126]

As molecular applications of the extended DK approach, we have calculated the spectroscopic constants for At2 equilibrium bond lengths (RJ, harmonic frequencies (rotational constants (B ), and dissociation energies (Dg). A strong spin-orbit effect is expected for these properties because the outer p orbital participates in their molecular bonds. Electron correlation effects were treated by the hybrid DFT approach with the B3LYP functional. Since several approximations to both the one-electron and two-electron parts of the DK Hamiltonian are available, we dehne that the DKnl -f DKn2 Hamiltonian ( 1, 2= 1-3) denotes the DK Hamiltonian with DKnl and DKn2 transformations for the one-electron and two-electron parts, respectively. The DKwl -I- DKl Hamiltonian is equivalent to the no-pair DKwl Hamiltonian. For the two-electron part the electron-electron Coulomb operator in the non-relativistic form can also be adopted. The DKwl Hamiltonian with the non-relativistic Coulomb operator is denoted by the DKwl - - NR Hamiltonian. [Pg.552]

As a result of the mean-field approximation, those pairs of Slater determinants that differ by more than one spin-orbital no longer contribute. This approximation is based on an idea similar to the conversion of the ordinary full electronic Hamiltonian into the one-electron Hartree-Fock operator and can be interpreted as describing electronic motion in an averaged field of the other electrons. [Pg.121]

In the study of the vibronic spectrum of a doublet HCCS radical, Peric et al. calculated the spin-orbit coupling constant at the equilibrium geometry of the radical by using the two-component relativistic no-pair Hamiltonian derived by Samzow et al. In the calculation, truncated (8,8)MRDCI wave functions were used with orbitals optimized for the triplet state of the corresponding cation. The spin-orbit coupling constant of 261 cm agreed well with the experimental data. [Pg.145]

A full relativistic theory for coupling tensors within the polarization propagator approach at the RPA level was presented as a generalization of the nonrelativistic theory. Relativistic calculations using the PP formalism have three requirements, namely (i) all operators representing perturbations must be given in relativistic form (ii) the zeroth-order Hamiltonian must be the Dirac-Coulomb-Breit Hamiltonian, /foBC, or some approximation to it and (iii) the electronic states must be relativistic spin-orbitals within the particle-hole or normal ordered representation. Aucar and Oddershede used the particle-hole Dirac-Coulomb-Breit Hamiltonian in the no-pair approach as a starting point, Eq. (18),... [Pg.84]


See other pages where No-pair spin-orbit Hamiltonian is mentioned: [Pg.126]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.6507]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.730]    [Pg.6506]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.11]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.126 ]




SEARCH



No-pair

No-pair Hamiltonian

Orbitals spin pairing

Paired spins

Spin Hamiltonian

Spin Hamiltonian Hamiltonians

Spin orbit hamiltonian

Spin pairs

Spin-orbit Hamiltonians

Spin-pairing

© 2024 chempedia.info