Breath analyzer test

Don t Drink and Drive The Breath Analyzer Test (Ch. 8, Real Life 8-2, p. 294) Protecting-Group Strategy (Ch. 9, p. 350)... 

The police often use a device called a breath analyzer to test drivers suspected of being drunk. The chemical basis of this device is a redox reaction. A sample of the driver s breath is drawn into the breath analyzer, where it is treated with an acidic solution of potassium dichromate. The alcohol (ethanol) in the breath is converted to acetic acid as shown in the following equation ... 

Many researchers have attempted to determine mercury levels in the blood, urine, tissues, and hair of humans and animals. Most methods have used atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS), or neutron activation analysis (NAA). In addition, methods based on mass spectrometry (MS), spectrophotometry, and anodic stripping voltametry (ASV) have also been tested. Of the available methods, cold vapor (CV) AAS is the most widely used. In most methods, mercury in the sample is reduced to the elemental state. Some methods require predigestion of the sample prior to reduction. At all phases of sample preparation and analysis, the possibility of contamination from mercury found naturally in the environment must be considered. Rigorous standards to prevent mercury contamination must be followed. Table 6-1 presents details of selected methods used to determine mercury in biological samples. Methods have been developed for the analysis of mercury in breath samples. These are based on AAS with either flameless (NIOSH 1994) or cold vapor release of the sample to the detection chamber (Rathje et al. 1974). Flameless AAS is the NIOSH-recommended method of determining levels of mercury in expired air (NIOSH 1994). No other current methods for analyzing breath were located. 

In vivo test of an oxygen optode in an ewe The breath gas composition was varied as shown on top, and the change in PO2 was followed with the inserted fiber sensor. The data points are values obtained ex vivo with a blood gas analyzer. From [56]. 

You analyze a breathalyzer test in which 4.2 mg K2Cr207 was reduced. Assuming the volume of the breath was 0.500 L at 30.°C and 750. mm Hg, what was the mole percent alcohol of the breath ... 

The breath of a test person was analyzed over a time period of about 30 hours by means of proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry [55]. After ingestion of cut raw garlic, tiie components allyl metfiyl sulfide, allyl methyl disulfide, diallyl sulfide, diallyl disulfide, diallyl trisulfide, dimethyl sulfide, and acetone were detected. While the concentrations of allyl mediyl disulfide, diallyl sulfide, diallyl disulfide, and diallyl trisulfide reached maximum concentration shortly after ingestion of garlic and declined to baseline values within the next 2-3 h, concentrations of allyl methyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, and acetone increased much more slowly... 

It was possible to predict the presence of the bacteria without the need for performing the standard C-urea breath tests. Breath samples from 11 patients and 22 healthy volunteers were collected and immediately analyzed by the electronic nose consisting of eight thickness shear-mode sensors. Data analysis was by linear discriminate analysis (LDA), and it was found that 87.5% of the patients were correctly classified. 

A more direct approach for analyzing absorption characteristics than the sampling of systemic or excreted body fluids entails the sampling of portal blood [24] or the collection of the mesenteric blood draining the sites of absorption of the test substance. Such a procedure requires considerably more complicated surgical techniques than that of sampling systemic blood, urine, or breath. Furthermore, transfusions of blood into the animal may be required. An important advantage of this procedure is the... 

The CO diffusing capacity, DLCO, is calculated by measuring the difference in alveolar CO concentrations at the beginning and end of a period of breath holding. The test begins by having die patient exhale completely to RV and then inspiring rapidly to TLC a breath of gas with a known CO concentration. After a 10-second breath-hold, the patient exhales rapidly (Fig. 21.14). The initial portion of this exhalation is discarded, as it contains gas from die dead space, and a portion of the subsequently exhaled gas, assumed to be well-mixed alveolar gas, is analyzed for CO content The initial alveolar concentration of CO is not the inspired concentration, as the inspired gas is diluted... 

The well-established GC methods for blood ethanol determination are today the Gold Standard in cases, where, for instance, results from the quantitative breath-alcohol analyzer used for evidential purpose are challenged. The basis for this importance is an overwhelming amount of data available from the GC tests and the rigorous QC scheme for precision and accuracy testing. 

The practice of breath collection onto silica adsorbent for later analysis to compare to the results of an evidential breath-testing device (EBT) is currently being performed in some laboratories in the United States. The contents are emptied into a vial, diluted with an aqueous internal standard solution (n-propanol) and analyzed by headspace GC using procedures similar to those for blood alcohol analysis, but adjusted for sensitivity differences. Reanalysis of breath samples collected in this manner is not recommended, however, due to factors other than instrument performance, such as sample collection and operator errors. 

One of the worries about many previous investigations of the effects of solvent abuse has been that, because objective measures to detect current intoxication have rarely been included, it has not been possible to reject the hypothesis that the cases were intoxicated, or at least still subject to the acute effects of solvents, at the time the psychological tests were administered. In order to ensure that the present study was concerned with the long-term effects of solvent abuse rather than the immediate effects of intoxication, it was necessary to be able to detect and, if necessary, exclude those children who were under the acute influence of solvents (or alcohol) at the time of testing. This was done by analyzing breath samples om each child... 

---