Boundary effects surface roughness

As a final point, we note that typical surfaces are usually not crystalline but instead are covered by amorphous layers. These layers are much rougher at the atomic scale than the model crystalline surfaces that one would typically use for computational convenience or for fundamental research. The additional roughness at the microscopic level from disorder increases the friction between surfaces considerably, even when they are separated by a boundary lubricant.15 Flowever, no systematic studies have been performed to explore the effect of roughness on boundary-lubricated systems, and only a few attempts have been made to investigate dissipation mechanisms in the amorphous layers under sliding conditions from an atomistic point of view. 

The effects of small-scale surface irregularities on the boundary layer transfer processes are usually incoiporated only through the surface roughness parameter zo- The range of variation of Zo over different land... 

The locus of a fully developed velocity change with height from the new point source as the wind moves downstream is called the boundary layer. Above this layer the effect of the change in roughness has not been completed. It appears from experiments that the boundary layer increases rather slowly in thickness as the wind moves downstream from the new obstacle. Some recent data show that the thickness at any given distance is proportional to the change in surface roughness and is independent of velocity. 

A large body of literature is available on estimating friction loss for laminar and turbulent flow of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids in smooth pipes. For laminar flow past solid boundaries, surface roughness has no effect (at least for certain degrees of roughness) on the friction pressure drop of either Newtonian or non-Newtonian fluids. In turbulent flow, however, die nature... 

Note that the surface roughnesses associated with smooth stone, galvanized steel, and painted surfaces are hydraulically smooth, that is they should have no substantial effects on boundary profiles and hence deposition velocity. Between 0.33 and 3mm, transition from laminar to turbulent flow may occur, depending on the Reynolds number. 

Relation (3.2.13) is valid in the region of laminar flow past the disk the laminar regime occurs until Re 104 to 105, depending on the roughness of the surface. For low Reynolds numbers (Re < 10), this relation is invalid, because the thickness of the hydrodynamic boundary layer becomes comparable with the disk radius and the boundary effects on the hydrodynamic flow and mass transfer become stronger. 

Mixed EHD film lubrication is encountered during the transition from full EHD film to boundary lubrication. In this region, surface roughness (texture) effects are particularly critical. A common method of accounting for surface roughness effects is through the use of the film parameter (A) ... 

Effects of surface roughness are also evident in the boundary layer mean velocity profiles shown in Fig. 6.46. The profiles still exhibit a near-wall logarithmic behavior, but with a dependence on the roughness Reynolds number k = ksu lv. The law of the wall for a rough surface may be written as... 

Each of SiC s crystalline polytypes has a distinct oxidation rate under the same oxidation conditions [1,3,4]. For the various SiC polytypes, the oxidation rate on the (0001) Si faces increases with the decrease in the percentage of hexagonality of the SiC polytype, while the growth rate on the (0001) C faces does not depend dramatically on polytype [3]. The dramatic difference in oxidation rates between opposite faces of the polar SiC crystal has long been known. Intermediate faces have intermediate oxidation rates [3]. As with other semiconductors, conduction type, dopant density, surface roughness and crystalline quality should also be expected to have an effect on the oxidation rate [5-7]. Selective oxidation at antiphase boundaries has been reported for wet oxidation of 3C-SiC heteroepitaxial layers, but not for dry oxidation [8-10]. 

A more obvious but perhaps underappreciated problem with surface roughness is the existence of defect sites on a surface, i.e., sites that would not be exposed on a perfectly smooth surface. This type of defect is separate from classical defects like stacking faults, subgrain boundaries and dislocations, and is due just to non-uniform expression of the substrate structure in an uneven surface (Fig. 9) such as could occur with the local development of vicinal faces. As surface characterization methods are generally poor except in the case of a small suite of oxides and silicates, this effect has probably not been fully considered to date. For example, it is possible to imagine a low roughness (hkl) surface that is entirely terminated by small faces with other (hkl) orientations, so that the exposed surface functional groups differ both in density and orientation from what is expected. 

---