Boundary condition, for particle

The boundary condition for particle diffusion differs from the condition for molecular dilTusion becau.se of the finite diameter of the particle. For certain classes of problems, such as flows around cylinders and spheres, the particle concentration is assumed to vanish at one particle radiu.s from the surface ... 

Initial- and Boundary Conditions for Particle Phase Equations... 

Particles are moved along their current velocity vectors without undergoing interactions for a time At which is chosen smaller than the mean collision time. If a particle hits the domain boundary, its velocity vector is modified according to the corresponding boundary condition (for example specular or diffuse reflection if a particle hits a wall) ... 

For each neutral particle the boundary conditions are formulated one then obtains a coupled set of equations, which is solved to obtain the boundary conditions for all neutral density balance equations. 

The friction coefficient of a large B particle with radius ct in a fluid with viscosity r is well known and is given by the Stokes law, Q, = 67tT CT for stick boundary conditions or ( = 4jit ct for slip boundary conditions. For smaller particles, kinetic and mode coupling theories, as well as considerations based on microscopic boundary layers, show that the friction coefficient can be written approximately in terms of microscopic and hydrodynamic contributions as ( 1 = (,(H 1 + (,/( 1. The physical basis of this form can be understood as follows for a B particle with radius ct a hydrodynamic description of the solvent should... 

The boundary conditions for the bed at the side wall with no net flow of particles across it are at... 

Besides the resuspension of particles, the perfect sink model also neglects the effect of deposited particles on incoming particles. To overcome these limitations, recent models [72, 97-99] assume that particles accumulate within a thin adsorption layer adjacent to the collector surface, and replace the perfect sink conditions with the boundary condition that particles cannot penetrate the collector. General continuity equations are formulated both for the mobile phase and for the immobilized particles in which the immobilization reaction term is decomposed in an accumulation and a removal term, respectively. Through such equations, one can keep track of the particles which arrive at the primary minimum distance and account for their normal and tangential motion. These equations were solved both approximately, and by numerical integration of the governing non-stationary transport equations. 

Subsequently, simulations are performed for the air Paratherm solid fluidized bed system with solid particles of 0.08 cm in diameter and 0.896 g/cm3 in density. The solid particle density is very close to the liquid density (0.868 g/ cm3). The boundary condition for the gas phase is inflow and outflow for the bottom and the top walls, respectively. Particles are initially distributed in the liquid medium in which no flows for the liquid and particles are allowed through the bottom and top walls. Free slip boundary conditions are imposed on the four side walls. Specific simulation conditions for the particles are given as follows Case (b) 2,000 particles randomly placed in a 4 x 4 x 8 cm3 column Case (c) 8,000 particles randomly placed in a 4 x 4 x 8 cm3 column and Case (d) 8,000 particles randomly placed in the lower half of the 4x4x8 cm3 column. The solids volume fractions are 0.42, 1.68, and 3.35%, respectively for Cases (b), (c), and (d). 

Lu et al. [7] extended the mass-spring model of the interface to include a dashpot, modeling the interface as viscoelastic, as shown in Fig. 3. The continuous boundary conditions for displacement and shear stress were replaced by the equations of motion of contacting molecules. The interaction forces between the contacting molecules are modeled as a viscoelastic fluid, which results in a complex shear modulus for the interface, G = G + mG", where G is the storage modulus and G" is the loss modulus. G is a continuum molecular interaction between liquid and surface particles, representing the force between particles for a unit shear displacement. The authors also determined a relationship for the slip parameter Eq. (18) in terms of bulk and molecular parameters [7, 43] ... 

From this, the velocities of particles flowing near the wall can be characterized. However, the absorption parameter a must be determined empirically. Sokhan et al. [48, 63] used this model in nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations to describe boundary conditions for fluid flow in carbon nanopores and nanotubes under Poiseuille flow. The authors found slip length of 3nm for the nanopores [48] and 4-8 nm for the nanotubes [63]. However, in the first case, a single factor [4] was used to model fluid-solid interactions, whereas in the second, a many-body potential was used, which, while it may be more accurate, is significantly more computationally intensive. 

In terms of the analytic solutions for flow around rigid and circulating particles, the effect of containing walls is to change the boundary conditions for the equations of motion and continuity of the continuous phase. In place of the condition of uniform flow remote from the particle, containing walls impose conditions which must be satisfied at definite boundaries. 

The investigation of the behaviour of Z(r, t) in a finite system is a difficult problem due to the fact that the boundary conditions for (7.3.3) are unknown for fractal systems although one can use some scaling arguments based on the knowledge of the properties of the infinite system. In the case of the independent production of different particles we obtain... 

In some cases, particularly in the growth of aerosol particles, the assumption of equilibrium at the interface must be modified. Frisch and Collins (F8) consider the diffusion equation, neglecting the convective term, and the form of the boundary condition when the diffusional jump length (mean free path) becomes comparable to the radius of the particle. One limiting case is the boundary condition proposed by Smoluchowski (S7), C(R, t) = 0, which presumes that all molecules colliding with the interface are absorbed there (equivalent to zero vapor pressure). A more realistic boundary condition for the case when the diffusion jump length, (z) R, has been shown by Collins and Kimball (Cll) and Collins (CIO) to be... 

The problem of linking atomic scale descriptions to continuum descriptions is also a nontrivial one. We will emphasize here that the problem cannot be solved by heroic extensions of the size of molecular dynamics simulations to millions of particles and that this is actually unnecessary. Here we will describe the use of atomic scale calculations for fixing boundary conditions for continuum descriptions in the context of the modeling of static structure (capacitance) and outer shell electron transfer. Though we believe that more can be done with these approaches, several kinds of electrochemical problems—for example, those associated with corrosion phenomena and both inorganic and biological polymers—will require approaches that take into account further intermediate mesoscopic scales. There is less progress to report here, and our discussion will be brief. 

Inside the box, the general solution is just the same as that given in the previous section, eqn 2.31. Outside the box, the potential is infinity, and the only sensible value of iff is zero otherwise, it would immediately go to infinity, which we assume to be impossible. We make a further assumption, that iff must be continuous, i.e. it cannot suddenly jump from one value to another. We therefore have the following boundary conditions for the particle-in-a-box problem ... 

Equation 3.48 is of course the same equation as we have solved before, e.g. for the particle in a box. Its solutions are simple sine and cosine functions of angular variable, which repeats itself every 2n radians. The boundary conditions for the wavefunction are therefore different from those for the particle in a box. There is no requirement that iff must be zero anywhere instead, it must be single valued, which means for any 0,... 

Note that equation (13) shows that there is a hierarchy of differential equations solution of the Smith-Ewart equations provides the boundary conditions for the singly distinguished particle equations these in turn provide the boundary conditions for the doubly distinguished particle equations. 

The boundary conditions for the gas phase are assumed to be of the same form as that for the single gas phase discussed in 5.2.5. For the particle phase, the boundary conditions are given as follows. 

For the boundary condition of particle concentration at the wall, a zero normal gradient condition is frequently adopted that is... 

The evaluation of these elements and the underlying theoretical support for the method can be found in Villadsen and Michelsen [38] who also provided subroutine listings that were used in this study. The boundary condition for the adsorbent particles is 0li>L+1 = collocation points that corresponds to a particular L-th-order polynomial approximation. The boundary condition for the capsule core is 0ci> M+1 = 0mi>o where M is the number of internal collocation points that correspond to a particular M-th-order polynomial approximation, and the boundary condition for the hydrogel membrane is bl where N is the number of internal collocation points that corresponds to a particular N-th-order polynomial approximation. Since the boundary conditions for the adsorbent and capsule core are coupled, and that of the capsule core and hydrogel membrane are also coupled, the boundary... 

We have thus far obtained the distribution functions for the incoming and reflected particles of reduced mass in different regions in terms of the unknown constants A and B and the unknown dimensionless surface temperature 8. The surface temperature was then related to the internal energy and the number density of the fictitious particle at the reflecting surface. Now, in order to determine the constants A and B, wc must specify the boundary conditions for the mass and the energy flux at the sphere of influence. 

Since the motion of the fictitious particle in Regions II and III is assumed to be collisionless, a reflected particle of reduced mass /Mr with kinetic cncigy less than the depth of the potential well 4>0 will be captured by the potential well. Therefore, the boundary condition for the mass flux is given by... 

---