Boron enolates formation

Whereas carboxylic esters had been considered to be inert under the conditions of boron enolate formation by enolization [2c], Corey s group elaborated protocols that allowed for the generation of boron enolates from esters. Thus, trans-boron enolates 100 result from simple carboxylic esters by deprotonation, while 5-phenyl thiopropionate formed cis-enolate 101 - in accordance with Masamune s observation. In both cases, the C2-symmetric diazaborolidine 99 served as the Lewis acid for enolization (Scheme 2.28) [112]. The stereochemical divergence of ester and thioester has been rationalized by postulating an E2-type elimination mechanism starting from the complex 102 that loses bromide in a... 

The synthesis of the polyol glycoside subunit 7 commences with an asymmetric aldol condensation between the boron enolate derived from imide 21 and a-(benzyloxy)acetaldehyde (24) to give syn adduct 39 in 87 % yield and in greater than 99 % diastereomeric purity (see Scheme 8a). Treatment of the Weinreb amide,20 derived in one step through transamination of 39, with 2-lithiopropene furnishes enone 23 in an overall yield of 92 %. To accomplish the formation of the syn 1,3-diol, enone 23 is reduced in a chemo- and... 

The following C2-symmetric bis-sulfonamide is a more efficient controller of stereoselectivity in aldol additions. The incorporation of this ligand into the bromodiazaborolane, subsequent generation of the boron enolate derived from 3-pentanone, and addition to achiral aldehydes preferentially leads to the formation of ijn-adducts (synjanti 94 6 to >98 2) with 95-98% ee. Chemical yields of 85-95% are achieved51. 

The enantiomeric /1-hydroxy ketones are available in an analogous way using the corresponding enantiomeric borinates. The reaction is plagued by low regioselectivity in the formation of the boron enolates, except when R1 is phenyl or isobutyl53,57. 

A high preference for the formation of. syw-adducts combined with remarkable induced diastereoselcctivity is also obtained with the boron enolate of 1598a and the tin enolate of 1698b. 

Crystalline, diastereomerieally pure syn-aIdols are also available from chiral A-acylsultams. lhe outcome of the induction can be controlled by appropriate choice of the counterion in the cnolate boron enolates lead, almost exclusively, to one adduct 27 (d.r. >97 3, major adduct/ sum of all other diastereomers) whereas mediation of the addition by lithium or tin leads to the predominant formation of adducts 28. Unfortunately, the latter reaction is plagued by lower induced stereoselectivity (d.r. 66 34 to 88 12, defined as above). In both cases, however, diastereomerieally pure adducts are available by recrystallizing the crude adducts. Esters can be liberated by treatment of the adducts with lithium hydroxide/hydrogen peroxide, whereby the chiral auxiliary reagent can be recovered106. 

Once again, excellent selectivity for formation of the j3-methyl isomer is observed in the case of the Lewis acid catalyzed reaction of the boron enolate of (4S )-4-isopropyl-3-(l-oxopropyl)-2-oxazolidinone 4177 (see Appendix). 

Note also the stereochemistry. In some cases, two new stereogenic centers are formed. The hydroxyl group and any C(2) substituent on the enolate can be in a syn or anti relationship. For many aldol addition reactions, the stereochemical outcome of the reaction can be predicted and analyzed on the basis of the detailed mechanism of the reaction. Entry 1 is a mixed ketone-aldehyde aldol addition carried out by kinetic formation of the less-substituted ketone enolate. Entries 2 to 4 are similar reactions but with more highly substituted reactants. Entries 5 and 6 involve boron enolates, which are discussed in Section 2.1.2.2. Entry 7 shows the formation of a boron enolate of an amide reactions of this type are considered in Section 2.1.3. Entries 8 to 10 show titanium, tin, and zirconium enolates and are discussed in Section 2.1.2.3. 

Another promising boron enolate is derived from (-)-menthone.133 It yields -boron enolates that give good enantioselectivity in the formation of anti products.134... 

Scheme 2.7 gives some examples of the control of stereoselectivity by use of additional Lewis acid and related methods. Entry 1 shows the effect of the use of excess TiCl4. Entry 2 demonstrates the ability of (C2H5)2A1C1 to shift the boron enolate toward formation of the 2,3-anti diastereomer. Entries 3 and 4 compare the use of one versus two equivalents of TiCl4 with an oxazoldine-2-thione auxiliary. There is a nearly complete shift of facial selectivity. Entry 5 shows a subsequent application of this methodology. Entries 6 and 7 show the effect of complexation of the aldehyde... 

A number of modifications were made to meet scale-up requirements. In the preparation of the common intermediate, LiBH4 was used in place of LiAlH4 in Step A-2 and a TEMPO-NaOCl oxidation was used in place of Swern oxidation in Step A-3. Some reactions presented difficulty in the scale-up. For example, the boron enolate aldolization in Step B-l gave about 50% yield on the 20- to 25-kg scale as opposed to greater than 75% on a 50-g scale. The amide formation in Step B-3 was modified to eliminate the use of trimethylaluminum, and the common intermediate 17 could be prepared on a 30-kg scale using this modified sequence. The synthesis of the C(l)-C(6) segment V was done by Steps C-l to C-5 in 66% yield on the scale of several kg. 

The C(9)-C(14) segment VI was prepared by Steps D-l to D-3. The formation of the vinyl iodide in Step D-3 was difficult and proceeded in only 25-30% yield. The C(15)-C(21) segment VII was synthesized from the common intermediate 17 by Steps E-l to E-6. A DDQ oxidation led to formation of a 1,3-dioxane ring in Step E-l. The A-methoxy amide was converted to an aldehyde by LiAlH4 reduction and the chain was extended to include C(14) and C(15) using a boron enolate of an oxazo-lidinone chiral auxiliary. After reductive removal of the chiral auxiliary, the primary alcohol group was converted to a primary iodide. The overall yield for these steps was about 25%. 

Because anti/syn ratios in the product can be correlated to the E(0)/Z(0) ratio of the involved boron enolate mixture,10b initial experiments were aimed at the preparation of highly E(0)-enriched boron enolate. The E(0)/Z(0) ratio increases with the bulk of the alkanethiol moiety, whereas the formation of Z(O) enolates prevails with (S )-aryl thioates. (E/Z = 7 93 for benzenethiol and 5 95 for 2-naphthalene thiol esters). E(O) reagent can be formed almost exclusively by reaction of (5)-3,3-diethyl-3-pentyl propanethioate 64 with the chiral boron triflate. High reactivity toward aldehydes can be retained in spite of the apparent steric demand (Scheme 3-22).43... 

Brown proposed a mechanism where the enolate radical resulting from the radical addition reacts with the trialkylborane to give a boron enolate and a new alkyl radical that can propagate the chain (Scheme 24) [61]. The formation of the intermediate boron enolate was confirmed by H NMR spectroscopy [66,67]. The role of water present in the system is to hydrolyze the boron enolate and to prevent its degradation by undesired free-radical processes. This hydrolysis step is essential when alkynones [68] and acrylonitrile [58] are used as radical traps since the resulting allenes or keteneimines respectively, react readily with radical species. Maillard and Walton have shown by nB NMR, ll NMR und IR spectroscopy, that tri-ethylborane does complex methyl vinyl ketone, acrolein and 3-methylbut-3-en-2-one. They proposed that the reaction of triethylborane with these traps involves complexation of the trap by the Lewis acidic borane prior to conjugate addition [69]. 

Perlmutter used an oxymercuration/demercuration of a y-hydroxy alkene as the key transformation in an enantioselective synthesis of the C(8 ) epimeric smaller fragment of lb (and many more pamamycin homologs cf. Fig. 1) [36]. Preparation of substrate 164 for the crucial cyclization event commenced with silylation and reduction of hydroxy ester 158 (85-89% ee) [37] to give aldehyde 159, which was converted to alkenal 162 by (Z)-selective olefination with ylide 160 (dr=89 l 1) and another diisobutylaluminum hydride reduction (Scheme 22). An Oppolzer aldol reaction with boron enolate 163 then provided 164 as the major product. Upon successive treatment of 164 with mercury(II) acetate and sodium chloride, organomercurial compound 165 and a second minor diastereomer (dr=6 l) were formed, which could be easily separated. Reductive demercuration, hydrolytic cleavage of the chiral auxiliary, methyl ester formation, and desilylation eventually led to 166, the C(8 ) epimer of the... 

The is-boron enolates show a modest preference for formation of the anti aldol product. 

Paquette et al. start with the bis-vinylogation of the same compound 29 [14], by Wittig-Horner reaction, reduction, and oxidation (Scheme 5). For the formation of the C17-C16 bond, the onti-aldol 41 (ds not reported) is obtained by treatment of the aldehyde 39 with the (Z)-boron enolate 40, bearing a dithioketal moiety that is later to be the C51-C54 side chain. 3-Hydroxy-assisted, diastereoselective reduction of the keto group at C15 gives 41, which is converted into intermediate 42 in five more steps. The dethioketalization of 41 is achieved with phenyliodine(m) bis(trifluoroacetate) [16], As in Nicolaou s synthesis, the N12-C13 amide bond is formed first, followed by a low-yielding (21%, even at a concentration of 1 him) macrolactonization to 3. Table 1 summarizes the benchmark data of the two total syntheses of sanglifehrin A (1). 

It has been demonstrated that optically active oxetanes can be formed from oxazolidinone 92, a crotonic acid moiety functionalized with Evans chiral auxiliary (Scheme 18) <1997JOC5048>. In this two-step aldol-cyclization sequence, the use of 92 in a deconjugative aldol reaction, with boron enolates and ethanal, led to formation of the syn-aldol 93. This product was then converted to the corresponding oxetanes, 94a and 94b, via a cyclization with iodine and sodium hydrogencarbonate. This reaction sequence was explored with other aldehydes to yield optically active oxetanes in similar yields. Unlike previous experiments using the methyl ester of crotonic acid, in an analogous reaction sequence rather than the oxazolidinone, there was no competing THF formation. 

Thus the homochiral aldehyde (-)-dimethylglutaric hemialdehyde in Equation B5.5 and the homochiral (S)-boron enolate of Equation B5.6 both favour formation of the 2R,3S diastereoisomer. When these two molecules are reacted together their stereochemical preferences reinforce one another (they are said to be matched ) and good stereoselectivity is observed (2R,3S 2S,3R = >100 1) (Equation B5.7). 

Both the nature of solvent and the temperature influenced the stereochemistry of boron enolates, with the solvent effect being greater than that of the temperature. Aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon solvent favored the formation of yy/z-aldols at — 78 °C, whereas aromatic and chlorinated aliphatic solvents favored the formation of anti-dXdoh at 0-25 °C (Equation (179)).682 683... 

In the total synthesis of (+)-trienomycins A and F, Smith et al. used an Evans aldol reaction technology to construct a 1,3-diol functional group8 (Scheme 2.1i). Asymmetric aldol reaction of the boron enolate of 14 with methacrolein afforded exclusively the desired xyn-diastereomer (17) in high yield. Silylation, hydrolysis using the lithium hydroperoxide protocol, preparation of Weinreb amide mediated by carbonyldiimidazole (CDI), and DIBAL-H reduction cleanly gave the aldehyde 18. Allylboration via the Brown protocol9 (see Chapter 3) then yielded a 12.5 1 mixture of diastereomers, which was purified to provide the alcohol desired (19) in 88% yield. Desilylation and acetonide formation furnished the diene 20, which contained a C9-C14 subunit of the TBS ether of (+)-trienomycinol. 

---