Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Block probability

The LST alleviates this problem by systematically approximating the probabilities of Bm, with M > N, from the set of probabilities of smaller blocks, Bi, B2,. .., Bn- In this way, order correlation information is used to predict the statistical properties of evolving patterns for arbitrarily large times. The outline of the approach begins with a formal definition of block probability functions. [Pg.249]

Block Probability Functions We define the block probability function of order-N, Pn, to be a map from Bat, Bat-i,. .., Bq into the reals that satisfies the... [Pg.249]

The set of all block probability functions of order-V is denoted by Pat. If two block probability functions, and Pm, with M > N, are self-consistent and are equal on blocks of size. s < N, they are said to be mutually consistent. [Pg.250]

Below, we will define a canonical procedure for constructing probabilities of blocks of arbitrary lengths consistent with a given block probability function P. The Kolmogorov consistency theorem will then allow us to use this set of finite block probabilities to define a measure on the set of infinite configurations, F. [Pg.250]

Notice that the truncation operators TZ and C appear in a symmetric fashion. We could have anticipated this, of course, since it should not matter whether an additional site is appended to the left or the right of Bg. More importantly, however, notice that the block B is of size (,s+1), so that the relation is already of the form of a map from s-block probabilities to (s + l)-block probabilities. In order to use this to define the operator we make the additional assumption that the form of... [Pg.251]

It is an easy exercise to show that if Pn satisfies the Kolmogorov consistency conditions (equations 5.68) for all blocks Bj of size j < N, then T[N- N+LPN) satisfies the Kolmogorov consistency conditions for blocks Bj of size j < N + 1. Given a block probability function P, therefore, we can generate a set of block probability functions Pj for arbitrary j > N hy successive applications of the operator TTN-tN+i, this set is called the Bayesian extension of Pn-... [Pg.251]

The Local Structure Operator By the Kolmogorov consistency theorem, we can use the Bayesian extension of Pn to define a measure on F. This measure -called the finite-block measure, /i f, where N denotes the order of the block probability function from which it is derived by Bayesian extension - is defined by assigning t.o each cylinder c Bj) = 5 G F cti = 6i, 0 2 = 62, , ( j — bj a value equal to the probability of its associated block ... [Pg.251]

Calculate the A-block probabilities for the next time step by summing the inverse image block probabilities of the current time step found in step 2. [Pg.252]

As a simple example, consider the A -order LST equations for range k = 2, r = 1 CA. Since the inverse image of an A-block is a block of size N + 2), we need to apply the operator 7TAf >Af+i to twice in succession to define the N + 2)-block probabilities ... [Pg.253]

In the same way as we found the pLorder equations, we obtain the 2" -order LST equations by first substituting equation 5.85 into the general form for the temporal evolution of block probabilities given by equation 5.76, and then simplifying the resulting expression by summing over sets of blocks of the same 2" -order type. [Pg.255]

The 1 and 2 block probabilities can be parameterized by any pair of linearly independent 1 and/or 2 block probabilities. For example, choosing the density pi... [Pg.255]

Hhe other 2-block probabilities are obtained by appealing to the Kolmogorov consistency conditions, defined in equation 5.68 Pio = Pol = Pi — Pll-... [Pg.256]

Equation 5.85, giving the Bayesian extension of 2-block probabilities, is first generalized to give the Bayesian extension of iV-block probabilities to probabilities of arbitrarily large M-blocks, Pm, M > N ... [Pg.257]

A basis set of probabilities, B = p(i),P(2), >P(s) is selected for parameterizing arbitrary iV-block probabilities. It is a simple exercise to show that, because of the constraints imposed by the the Kolmogorov consistency conditions (equation 5.68, s -= 2 basis elements are necessary. [Pg.257]

The essence of the LST for one-dimensional lattices resides in the fact that an operator TtN->N+i could be constructed (equation 5.71), mapping iV-block probability functions to [N -f l)-block probabilities in a manner which satisfies the Kolmogorov consistency conditions (equation 5.68). A sequence of repeated applications of this operator allows us to define a set of Bayesian extended probability functions Pm, M > N, and thus a shift-invariant measure on the set of all one-dimensional configurations, F. Unfortunately, a simple generalization of this procedure to lattices with more than one dimension, does not, in general, produce a set of consistent block probability functions. Extensions must instead be made by using some other, approximate, method. We briefly sketch a heuristic outline of one approach below (details are worked out in [guto87b]). [Pg.258]

The d-dimensional analogue of the operator tt, mapping JV-block probabilities to (N + l)-block probabilities, is an operator, Fj, defining the Bayesian extension of Pp to Ppi along dimension j. Here, Ppi = where is an extension of... [Pg.259]

For the 2- and 3-dimensional cases the channel interconnections allow a substantial fraction of the micropore capacity to be accessible below a percolation threshold in blocking probability. Above this percolation threshold, the accessible micropore volume is limited to the perimeter region of the ciystallite [82]. [Pg.251]

Retroperitoneal hematoma has been reported as a complication of pudendal block, probably due to pudendal artery perforation (SEDA-21,134). [Pg.2142]

The docking part is the thickest part of the door, and the thick dose of door will cause the increasing of blocking probability and sharp increasing of stress. In order to avoid that, the... [Pg.443]

Pb,FA,o upper demanded limit of blocking probability for the FA class... [Pg.1884]

Finally in (Koutras VP. Platis A. N., 2008) the problem of (Koutras VP. Platis A. N., 2006) was examined by a slightly different view. The website provider offers guaranteed levels of resource availability to higher priority classes and simultaneously free access to resources to as many visitors as possible. The aim was to minimize the blocking probability of free access visitors and simultaneously provide the guaranteed availability to high priority classes. [Pg.1885]

The aim of this study is to derive the optimal membership fee for the two membership classes that maximizes the profit for the website s point of view with respect to the constraints about costs and profits of advertisements and simultaneously minimize the blocking probabilities as far as the Run Out of Resources (RoR) probabdily. According to the study so far, the profit function can be defined as ... [Pg.1886]

The blocking probability of each class can be determined using the formulas in equation (3). As it is shown in (3) the blocking probabilities depends on the number of resources gi that are reserved for the GF and SF class and the corresponding reserved resources g2 that can be accessed only by the GF class. [Pg.1887]

As far as the resource availability is concerned, due to priorities the website has to provide higher levels of availability for the GF class that are paying a higher fee, than for the GF and FA classes. Hence, let s assume that the resource availability provided for GF class is 99.999%. The SF class achieves an availability level of 99.9%. Finally, resource availability has to be provided in high levels for the FA class also, in order to make the website attractive to more FA visitors and hence the number of advertisements viewers to be increased. This level of resource availability is assumed to reach 99%. Consequently the predefined levels consisting upper bounds for the blocking probabilities of each class can be then determined and they are shown also in Table 1. [Pg.1888]

Baldi M., Ofek Y., 2000, Blocking Probability with Time-driven Priority Scheduling, SCS Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (SPECTS 2000). [Pg.1890]

Vu H. L., Zukerman M., 2002, Blocking Probability for Priority Classes in Optical Burst Switching Networks, IEEE Communications Letters, 6(5), pp. 214-216. [Pg.1891]


See other pages where Block probability is mentioned: [Pg.217]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.720]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.1884]    [Pg.1884]    [Pg.1885]    [Pg.1886]    [Pg.1887]    [Pg.1887]    [Pg.1888]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.217 , Pg.249 , Pg.720 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info