Binding of Substrate

Figure 11.14 Schematic diagram of the active site of subtilisin. A region (residues 42-45) of a bound polypeptide inhibitor, eglin, is shown in red. The four essential features of the active site— the catalytic triad, the oxyanion hole, the specificity pocket, and the region for nonspecific binding of substrate—are highlighted in yellow. Important hydrogen bonds between enzyme and inhibitor are striped. This figure should be compared to Figure 11.9, which shows the same features for chymotrypsin. (Adapted from W. Bode et al., EMBO /.

By changing Ser 221 in subtilisin to Ala the reaction rate (both kcat and kcat/Km) is reduced by a factor of about 10 compared with the wild-type enzyme. The Km value and, by inference, the initial binding of substrate are essentially unchanged. This mutation prevents formation of the covalent bond with the substrate and therefore abolishes the reaction mechanism outlined in Figure 11.5. When the Ser 221 to Ala mutant is further mutated by changes of His 64 to Ala or Asp 32 to Ala or both, as expected there is no effect on the catalytic reaction rate, since the reaction mechanism that involves the catalytic triad is no longer in operation. However, the enzyme still has an appreciable catalytic effect peptide hydrolysis is still about 10 -10 times the nonenzymatic rate. Whatever the reaction mechanism... 

In non-competitive inhibition, the substrate (S) and inhibitor (I) have equal potential to bind to the free enzyme (E). The inhibitor forms a ternary complex with enzyme-substrate (ES) whereas the substrate will form another ternary complex with enzyme-inhibitor (El). Since the non-competitive inhibitor had no effect on the binding of substrate to the enzyme, the Km value remained consistent (or unchanged). There are two different ways for the formation of ESI ternary complex this complex would not form the product and therefore was decreased. Non-competitive inhibitor had no effect on substrate binding or the enzyme-substrate affinity, therefore the apparent rate constant (K ) was unchanged.5 A possible reason for product inhibition was because of the nature of 2-ethoxyethanol,... 

Figure 2.11 CASTing of the lipase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAL) leading to the construction of five libraries of mutants (A-E) produced by simultaneous randomization at sites composed of two amino acids. (For illustrative purposes, the binding of substrate (1) is shown) [25],...

Despite its weakness, the anisotropy of the g tensor of iron-sulfur centers can be used to determine the orientation of these centers or that of the accommodating polypeptide in relation to a more complex system such as a membrane-bound complex. For this purpose, the EPR study has to be carried out on either partially or fully oriented systems (oriented membranes or monocrystals, respectively). Lastly, the sensitivity of the EPR spectra of iron-sulfur centers to structural changes can be utilized to monitor the conformational changes induced in the protein by different factors, such as the pH and the ionic strength of the solvent or the binding of substrates and inhibitors. We return to the latter point in Section IV. 

The Hill Equation Describes the Behavior of Enzymes That Exhibit Cooperative Binding of Substrate... 

In noncompetitive inhibition, binding of the inhibitor does not affect binding of substrate. Formation of both EI and EIS complexes is therefore possible. However, while the enzyme-inhibitor complex can still bind substrate, its efficiency at transforming substrate to product, reflected by is decreased. Noncompetitive... 

Since no chemical reaction is involved, measurements of binding of substrates and products to the enzyme under equilibrium conditions can be easily performed and are adequately described by the following equilibria,... 

As we have seen before, the enzymatic reaction begins with the reversible binding of substrate (S) to the free enzyme ( ) to form the ES complex, as quantified by the dissociation constant Ks. The ES complex thus formed goes on to generate the reaction product(s) through a series of chemical steps that are collectively defined by the first-order rate constant kCM. The first mode of inhibitor interaction that can be con-... 

Substrate inhibition physical binding of substrate adsorption of substrate on resin... 

For a binding reaction we can pick whether we show the reaction as favorable or unfavorable by picking the substrate concentration we use. Association constants have concentration units (M-1)- The equilibrium position of the reaction (how much ES is present) depends on what concentration we pick for the substrate. At a concentration of the substrate that is much less than the dissociation constant for the interaction, most of the enzyme will not have substrate bound, the ratio[ES]/[E] will be small, and the apparent equilibrium constant will also be small. This all means that at a substrate concentration much less than the dissociation constant, the binding of substrate is unfavorable. At substrate concentrations higher than the dissociation constant, most of the enzyme will have substrate bound and the reaction will be shown as favorable (downhill). (See also the discussion of saturation behavior in Chap. 8.)... 

RPTK activation. The activity of RPTKs is normally suppressed in their quiescent state. This suppression is due to the numerous loose and unstructured conformations of the activation loop (A loop) within the catalytic domain the majority of these conformations interfere with substrate and ATP binding. However, a subset of these conformations is amenable to binding of substrate and ATP, resulting in activation of the RPTKs. Phosphorylation of the tyrosine residue(s) in the A loop shifts the equilibrium towards the active conformation. Because of steric hindrance, PTK catalytic domains appear to be unable to autophosphorylate tyrosine residue(s) in the A loop within the same molecule rather frans-autophosphoryla-tion between two different catalytic domains is necessary for their activation. As a consequence, ligand-induced dimerization is an important step in the activation of RPTKs (Fig. 24-7). 

Binding of substrates to exportins is regulated in a converse manner to importins. Exportins bind their cargoes preferentially in the nucleus, forming a trimeric cargo exportin Ran GTP complex [142]. This trimeric complex is then transferred to the cytoplasm where Ran GTP is converted to Ran GDP. This results in Ran s dissociation from the complex, allowing the exportin to release its substrate, re-enter the nucleus, and to start the next export cycle. 

Fig. 17 The Stewart-Benkovic plot of rate enhancement vs relative binding of substrate and TSA for 60 abzyme-catalysed reactions (Stewart and Benkovic, 1995).

Reversible inhibitors are more subtle and act usefully to control the rate of particular enzymes. Often, reversible inhibitors are substrates found at or near the end of a pathway. These compounds act in a negative feedback manner to slow down the activity of an enzyme at or near the beginning of the same pathway. Occasionally, feedback inhibitors may be substrates found within a pathway which is functionally related to the one in which the target enzyme can be found. Furthermore, the products of an enzyme-catalysed reaction are often inhibitory to the enzyme that generated them (Figure 3.2). This is should not be surprising from a structural point of view because the product must fit into the active site of the enzyme and so block the binding of substrate. 

In addition to the binding of substrate (or in some cases co-substrates) at the active site, many enzymes have the capacity to bind regulatory molecules at sites which are usually spatially far removed from the catalytic site. In fact, allosteric enzymes are invariably multimeric (i.e. have a quaternary structure) and the allosteric (regulatory) sites are on different subunits of the protein to the active site. In all cases, the binding of the regulatory molecules is non covalent and is described in kinetic terms as noncompetitive inhibition. 

The relationship between substrate concentration ([S]) and reaction velocity (v, equivalent to the degree of binding of substrate to the active site) is, in the absence of cooperativity, usually hyperbolic in nature, with binding behavior complying with the law of mass action. However, the equation describing the hyperbolic relationship between v and [S] can be simple or complex, depending on the enzyme, the identity of the substrate, and the reaction conditions. Quantitative analyses of these v versus [S] relationships are referred to as enzyme kinetics. 

In a sequential reaction, all the substrates must be bound to the enzyme before any release of product can occur. Sequential systems can be either ordered or random. In an ordered sequential reaction, substrates must bind to the enzyme in a particular order, whereas in a random sequential system, substrates may bind to the enzyme in any order. In reaction schemes, substrates are usually abbreviated as A, B, C, and D in the order that they bind to the enzyme, whereas products are abbreviated as P, Q, R, and S in the order that they leave the enzyme. Sequential binding of substrates is a consequence of their orientation within the enzyme active site. 

---