Binding energy temperature dependence

Section 6.1 considered the noncovalent binding energies that stabilize a protein strnctnre. However, the folding of a protein depends ultimately on the difference in Gibbs free energy (AG) between the folded (F) and unfolded (U) states at some temperature T ... 

We see that, in (134), depending on the relative binding energies, the value of J may be positive or negative. In a particular case we may find J equal to zero. This condition could be satisfied only at a particular temperature, since the electrostatic energy in the ionic field is sensitive to temperature. 

The model [39] was developed using three assumptions the conformers are in thermodynamic equilibrium, the peak intensities of the T-shaped and linear features are proportional to the populations of the T-shaped and linear ground-state conformers, and the internal energy of the complexes is adequately represented by the monomer rotational temperature. By using these assumptions, the temperature dependence of the ratio of the intensities of the features were equated to the ratio of the quantum mechanical partition functions for the T-shaped and linear conformers (Eq. (7) of Ref. [39]). The ratio of the He l Cl T-shaped linear intensity ratios were observed to decay single exponentially. Fits of the decays yielded an approximate ground-state binding... 

Table 10.4 lists the values of trap density and binding energy obtained in the quasi-ballistic model for different hydrocarbon liquids by matching the calculated mobility with experimental determination at one temperature. The experimental data have been taken from Allen (1976) and Tabata et ah, (1991). In all cases, the computed activation energy slightly exceeds the experimental value, and typically for n-hexane, 0/Eac = 0.89. Some other details of calculation will be found in Mozumder (1995a). It is noteworthy that in low-mobility liquids ballistic motion predominates. Its effect on the mobility in n-hexane is 1.74 times greater than that of diffusive trap-controlled motion. As yet, there has been no calculation of the field dependence of electron mobility in the quasi-ballistic model. 

The final question we shall consider here has to do with the extrapolation of the solubility of hydrogen in silicon to lower temperatures. Extrapolation of a high-temperature Arrhenius line, e.g., from Fig. 11, would at best give an estimate of the equilibrium concentration of H°, or perhaps of all monatomic species, in intrinsic material the concentration of H2 complexes would not be properly allowed for, nor would the effects of Fermi-level shifts. Obviously the temperature dependence of the total dissolved hydrogen concentration in equilibrium with, say, H2 gas at one atmosphere, will depend on a number of parameters whose values are not yet adequately known the binding energy AE2 of two H° into H2 in the crystal, the locations of the hydrogen donor and acceptor levels eD, eA, respectively, etc. However, the uncertainties in such quantities are not so... 

---