Below detection, limit identification

Absence (below detection limit) No identification points are obtained using MS. 

Due to the predicted and previously detected low concentrations of pesticides in environmental samples (usually around the nanogram per liter level), a preconcentration step of the water samples is necessary prior to measurement. In this way, a preconcentration factor of several orders of magnitude (200-1,000-fold) is mandatory to reach the low detection limits necessary for the identification of pesticides, especially in complex wastewater samples. Also, the use of surrogate standards (e.g., triphenyl phosphate) added before the extraction step is a common practice in order to account for possible errors during the extraction process and for quantitative purposes. The commonly used extraction methods for polar compounds from water matrices involve isolation using liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid-phase extraction (SPE), which are commented on below. Other methods such as semipermeable membrane devices (SPMD) are also mentioned. 

Limit of detection. Any odorant present above its threshold level can be detected in a GC-0 experiment. This can vary from a few ppb to a ppt level or higher. Odorants present in trace quantities are frequently below the limit of detection of an FID, so GC-0 is the only method available for their identification. GC-0 coupled with SIM provides the most sensitive method of identifying and quantifying trace odorants. 

Three samples (4, 26, and 27) demonstrated the complementary rather than parallel functions of IR and TLC analyses in organic archaeometry. Organic materials were not revealed by IR in sample 4, but both abietic and dehydroabietic acids were detected by TLC in the same sample. Clearly, the resin acid concentrations were below the limit of detection of whole-resin IR spectroscopy but were sufficient for detection by TLC, Conversely, samples 26 and 27 showed neither acid by TLC but gave a clear indication of the isopropyl structure in the IR spectra. In this case, the IR technique was superior although the resin acids have been lost evidently (most likely by decarboxylation), the remaining neutral compounds retained the isopropyl group, a fact that allowed the identification of the samples as pine pitches. 

Although a chromatogram may not lead to positive identification of the species in a sample, it often provides sure evidence of the absence of a species. Thus, failure of a sample to produce a peak at the same retention time as a standard obtained under identical conditions is strong evidence that the compound in question is absent (or present at a concentration below the detection limit of the procedure). 

A compromise solution for dereplication procedures is to use a combination of ionization modes. In one report (31), electrospray MS in both positive and negative modes was coupled to an HPLC interface and used to obtain information on unknown components of crude biologically active extracts. The authors of this report claimed successful identification of a known natural product in two out of eight biologically active extracts examined, another two compounds were identified as novel, and they assumed that the active components in the remaining four did not ionize or were present at a concentration below the limits of MS detection. 

The applications of GCMS have generally been concerned with compound identification in complex mixtures. The high sensitivity of the mass spectrometer can also lead to detection and identification of compounds present at concentrations below the detection limit of other analytical techniques. The TIC chromatogram in Figure 4.6 was obtained from analysis of the headspace above a pharmaceutical product. 

As reversible, competitive inhibitors of enzymes, porphyrins can be used for identification and quantification of a substrate or other competitive inhibitors of enzymes. This approach has been successful in the development of cholinesterase and organophosphorus hydrolase bearing glass surfaces for the detection of substrates and inhibitors, including organophosphate compounds. The technique has demonstrated detection limits for sarin (GB) below the Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health levels mdicated by CDC/NIOSH. 

Spectroscopy by UV-Vis and MS, when in total ion count mode, yields comparable detection limits for flavonoids, in the range of 10 ng. When single ion monitoring (SIM) mode is used, MS analysis provides better detection limits, usually below 1 ng. " SIM mode, however, causes loss of valuable information concerning fragmentation pattern, which is very important for the identification of many compounds. 

When very small amounts of iodide are to be detected (quantities below the limit of identification of test (2)), the iodide may be oxidized toiodate. The iodine can then be liberated by the addition of iodide and acid ... 

---