Behavior complex system

Many complex systems have been spread on liquid interfaces for a variety of reasons. We begin this chapter with a discussion of the behavior of synthetic polymers at the liquid-air interface. Most of these systems are linear macromolecules however, rigid-rod polymers and more complex structures are of interest for potential optoelectronic applications. Biological macromolecules are spread at the liquid-vapor interface to fabricate sensors and other biomedical devices. In addition, the study of proteins at the air-water interface yields important information on enzymatic recognition, and membrane protein behavior. We touch on other biological systems, namely, phospholipids and cholesterol monolayers. These systems are so widely and routinely studied these days that they were also mentioned in some detail in Chapter IV. The closely related matter of bilayers and vesicles is also briefly addressed. 

This procedure constitutes an application of the steady-state approximation [also called the quasi-steady-state approximation, the Bodenstein approximation, or the stationary-state hypothesis]. It is a powerful method for the simplification of complicated rate equations, but because it is an approximation, it is not always valid. Sometimes the inapplicability of the steady-state approximation is easily detected for example, Eq. (3-143) predicts simple first-order behavior, and significant deviation from this behavior is evidence that the approximation cannot be applied. In more complex systems the validity of the steady-state approximation may be difficult to assess. Because it is an approximation in wide use, much critical attention has been directed to the steady-state hypothesis. 

The emerging new sciences of complexity and complex adaptive systems explore the important question of whether (and/or to what extent) does the behavior of the many seemingly disparate complex systems found in nature-from the very small to the very large-stem from the same fundamental core set of universal principles. 

Exact computability in this sense, however, is achieved only at the cost of being able to obtain approximate solutions. Perturbation analysis, for example, is rendered virt ially meaningless in this context. It is not s irprising that traditional investigatory methodologies are not very well suited to studies of complex systems. Since the behavior of such models can generally be obtained only through explicit simulation, the computer becomes the one absolutely indispensable research tool. 

Note that the form of development of these systems from left to right remains approximately constant over the range of sizes sampled (8 < iV < 16), which may therefore represent characteristic signatures of behavior by which specific rules evolving larger systems may be identified. It is clear that even at this relatively primitive level of behavioral complexity there nonetheless already exists an unexpected dynamic richness. 

Effective computation, such as that required by life processes and the maintenance of evolvability and adaptability in complex systems, requires both the storage and transmission of information. If correlations between separated sites (or agents) of a system are too small - as they are in the ordered regime shown in figure 11.3 -the sites evolve essentially independently of one another and little or no transmission takes place. On the other hand, if the correlations are too strong - as they are in the chaotic regime - distant sites may cooperate so strongly so as to effectively mimic each other s behavior, or worse yet, whatever ordered behavior is present may be... 

Hierarchical Structure. In order to be better able to simulate the hierarchical nature of many real-world complex systems, in which agent behavior can itself be best described as being the result of the collective behavior of some swarm of constituent agents. Swarm is designed so that agents themselves can be swarms of other agents. Moreover, Swarm is designed around a time hierarchy, Thus, Swarm is both a nested hierarchy of swarms and a nested hierarchy of schedules. 

Just what do we mean when we say that something is complex To make it slightly easier, we should really be ask two separate questions. First, What is a complex system , followed by What is complex behavior While neither of these two questions is particularly easy to answer rigorously, the task is, conceptually at least, made easier if we use cellular automata as paradigms for both they not only constitute the prototypical complex dynamical system, but their behavior literally spans the spectrum from nuii-rule-like triviality to Conway s Lifo-rule-like computa tional universality the latter of which arguably represents as complex a behavior as is likely to be found anywhere. With this image in mind, let us address the above two questions. 

Inspired by characteristic features of the emergent behavior in complex systems and CA that we have examined in this book, we therefore suggest the following two axioms to augment those already subsumed in conventional physics ... 

It has been suggested that benzylic radicals may form a dimeric association complex which may easily collapse to the combination product but be geometrically unfavorable for disproportionation.1,8-179 Even if this applies for the aralkyl radicals, it cannot account for the behavior of systems with other / -substituents. 

Elemental sulfur is one of the best investigated chemical elements but it represents also one of the most complex systems. The large number of its allotropes (ca. 30 [1]) and their peculiar behavior on melting, vaporization... 

Chemistry, like other sciences, progresses through the use of models. Models are the means by which we attempt to understand nature. In this book, we are primarily concerned with models of complex systems, those systems whose behaviors result from the many interactions of a large number of ingredients. In this context, two powerful approaches have been developed in recent years for chemical investigations molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo calculations [4-7]. Both techniques have been made possible by the development of extremely powerful, modern, high-speed computers. 

Complex systems can be identified by what they do (display organization without a central organizing authority—emergence) and also by how they may or may not be analyzed (as decomposing the system and analyzing sub-parts do not necessarily give a clue as to the behavior of the whole). 

Dissipative, open systems that allow for the flux of energy and matter may exhibit non-linear and complex behavior. Following the above argumentation, complex systems are usually far from thermodynamic equilibrium but, despite the flux, there may be a stable pattern, which may arise from small perturbations that cause a larger, non-proportional effect. These patterns can be stabilized by positive (amplifying)... 

---