Basis sets transformation

In terms of the three-dimensional local coordinate transformations R leading to the local basis set transformations Tf k>, the entire macromolecular system is naturally covered with a family of local coordinate systems. These local coordinate systems are also pairwise compatible, since the actual transformation V< > between any two such local systems of some serial indices k and k can be given explicitly as... 

An important concept is that of spectral properties of matrices. A matrix can be diagonalized if there is a basis in which the matrix is diagonal. If so, there exists a basis set transformation, in this context called similarity transformation, of the form... 

Within the basis sets of a reaction, the operator Q L (or the superoperator Qkl) represented by a unit matrix. In an arbitrary orthonormal basis le,KL> in the space HKL, the operator is represented by the inverse of the unitary matrix 0 of the basis set transformation ... 

It is also possible to perform a basis set transformation from primitive basis functions to symmetry combinations of the KS MOs of the atoms or larger fragments that constitute a system. In that case the population matrix elements P v become more meaningful, because they reflect the involvement of the fragment MOs in the orbitals of the total system. A Mulliken population analysis in... 

This MO eDF can be written in a general way, as a double sum of products of function pairs, coupled with a set of matrix coefficients [87]. However, a simple matrix diagonalization, followed by a unitary MO basis set transformation, can revert DF to the formal expression in equation (A-1), [54a),88]. The coefficient set W = Wj c R, interpreted as MO occupation indices, corresponds to a collection of positive real numbers. A unit norm convention has been adopted ... 

It has been shown in Ref. 5 that the electronic basis set transformation leads to the following matrix Schrodinger equation ... 

The transformation of Eq. (16.4) is not really a quasiparticle transformation, since it just reflects a transformation of the underlying orbital space If creates an electron on orbital Xi than creates one on = X/t ikXk- The canonical condition of Eq. (16.5) means that the transformation matrix A is unitary. In Sect. 13 we have also seen non-unitary basis set transformations of the form of Eq. (16.4), for which Eq. (16.5) does not hold, and which do not leave the anticommutation rules invariant. 

U(qJ is referred to as an adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation (ADT) matrix. Its mathematical sbucture is discussed in detail in Section in.C. If the electronic wave functions in the adiabatic and diabatic representations are chosen to be real, as is normally the case, U(q ) is orthogonal and therefore has n n — l)/2 independent elements (or degrees of freedom). This transformation mabix U(qO can be chosen so as to yield a diabatic electronic basis set with desired properties, which can then be used to derive the diabatic nuclear motion Schrodinger equation. By using Eqs. (27) and (28) and the orthonormality of the diabatic and adiabatic electronic basis sets, we can relate the adiabatic and diabatic nuclear wave functions through the same n-dimensional unitary transformation matrix U(qx) according to... 

At this stage, we would like to emphasize that the same transformation has to be applied to the electronic adiabatic basis set in order not to affect the total wave function of both the elecbons and the nuclei. Thus if is the electronic basis set that is attached to 4> then and are related to each other as... 

Tie first consideration is that the total wavefunction and the molecular properties calculated rom it should be the same when a transformed basis set is used. We have already encoun-ered this requirement in our discussion of the transformation of the Roothaan-Hall quations to an orthogonal set. To reiterate suppose a molecular orbital is written as a inear combination of atomic orbitals ... 

Each of these tools has advantages and limitations. Ab initio methods involve intensive computation and therefore tend to be limited, for practical reasons of computer time, to smaller atoms, molecules, radicals, and ions. Their CPU time needs usually vary with basis set size (M) as at least M correlated methods require time proportional to at least M because they involve transformation of the atomic-orbital-based two-electron integrals to the molecular orbital basis. As computers continue to advance in power and memory size, and as theoretical methods and algorithms continue to improve, ab initio techniques will be applied to larger and more complex species. When dealing with systems in which qualitatively new electronic environments and/or new bonding types arise, or excited electronic states that are unusual, ab initio methods are essential. Semi-empirical or empirical methods would be of little use on systems whose electronic properties have not been included in the data base used to construct the parameters of such models. 

XI. Complex Numbers, Fourier Series, Fourier Transforms, Basis Sets... 

Besides the intrinsic usefulness of Fourier series and Fourier transforms for chemists (e.g., in FTIR spectroscopy), we have developed these ideas to illustrate a point that is important in quantum chemistry. Much of quantum chemistry is involved with basis sets and expansions. This has nothing in particular to do with quantum mechanics. Any time one is dealing with linear differential equations like those that govern light (e.g. spectroscopy) or matter (e.g. molecules), the solution can be written as linear combinations of complete sets of solutions. 

The Lowdin population analysis scheme was created to circumvent some of the unreasonable orbital populations predicted by the Mulliken scheme, which it does. It is different in that the atomic orbitals are first transformed into an orthogonal set, and the molecular orbital coefficients are transformed to give the representation of the wave function in this new basis. This is less often used since it requires more computational work to complete the orthogonalization and has been incorporated into fewer software packages. The results are still basis-set-dependent. 

If the basis set e of unit vectors in cartesian 3-space transforms... 

All of these formulae apply to the case of orthonormal basis sets [7] corresponding expressions for the general case of metric A are easily obtained via similarity transformations, see, for instance, (70). 

The K-matrix method is essentially a configuration interaction (Cl) performed at a fixed energy lying in the continuum upon a basis of "unperturbed funetions that (at the formal level) includes both diserete and eontinuous subsets. It turns the Schrodinger equation into a system of integral equations for the K-matrix elements, which is then transformed into a linear system by a quadrature upon afinite L basis set. 

There is ample evidence [9,17,44] that the INDO SCF procedure transformed according to this scheme (C INDO) can provide predictions comparable to those of minimal-basis-set ab initio SCF calculations for conformations and rotational barriers of conjugated molecules in the ground state. 

---