Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Basis sets systematic generation

Most of the techniques described in this Chapter are of the ab initio type. This means that they attempt to compute electronic state energies and other physical properties, as functions of the positions of the nuclei, from first principles without the use or knowledge of experimental input. Although perturbation theory or the variational method may be used to generate the working equations of a particular method, and although finite atomic orbital basis sets are nearly always utilized, these approximations do not involve fitting to known experimental data. They represent approximations that can be systematically improved as the level of treatment is enhanced. [Pg.519]

The quality of quantum-chemical calculations depends not only on the chosen n-electron model but also critically on the flexibility of the one-electron basis set in terms of which the MOs are expanded. Obviously, it is possible to choose basis sets in many different ways. For highly accurate, systematic studies of molecular systems, it becomes important to have a well-defined procedure for generating a sequence of basis sets of increasing flexibility. A popular hierarchy of basis functions are the correlation-consistent basis sets of Dunning and coworkers [15-17], We shall use two varieties of these sets the cc-pVXZ (correlation-consistent polarized-valence X-tuple-zeta) and cc-pCVXZ (correlation-consistent polarized core-valence X-tuple-zeta) basis sets see Table 1.1. [Pg.4]

Modern many-body methods have become sufficiently refined that the major source of error in most ab initio calculations of molecular properties is today associated with truncation of one-particle basis sets e.g. [1]- [4]) that is, with the accuracy with which the algebraic approximation is implemented. The importance of generating systematic sequences of basis sets capable of controlling basis set truncation error has been emphasized repeatedly in the literature (see [4] and references therein). The study of the convergence of atomic and molecular structure calculations with respect to basis set extension is highly desirable. It allows examination of the convergence of calculations with respect to basis set size and the estimation of the results that would be obtained from complete basis set calculations. [Pg.108]

The spin functions used by the program are the set of Rumer ° (or bonded) functions. Besides highlighting the formation or disintegration of covalent bonds, this basis has the advantage that the structures in it are very easily decomposed into Slater determinants. The coefficients of the individual determinants are just + 1. The Rumer basis of spin functions is not orthogonal, and a linearly independent set is systematically generated using... [Pg.363]

For atoms the exhaustive optimization of a small number of exponents, which was a practice necessitated by computer limitations in the sixties, has been largely replaced by systematically generated sequences of basis sets with which, for example, the Hartree-Fock limit can be approached with almost machine accuracy. For example, even-tempered basis sets in which exponents are generated according to the formula... [Pg.49]

The non-relativistic PolMe (9) and quasirelativistic NpPolMe (10) basis sets were used in calculations reported in this paper. The size of the [uncontractd/contracted] sets for B, Cu, Ag, and Au is [10.6.4./5.3.2], [16.12.6.4/9.7.3.2], [19.15.9.4/11.9.5.2], and [21.17.11.9/13.11.7.4], respectively. The PolMe basis sets were systematically generated for use in non-relativistic SCF and correlated calculations of electric properties (10, 21). They also proved to be successful in calculations of IP s and EA s (8, 22). Nonrelativistic PolMe basis sets can be used in quasirelativistic calculations in which the Mass-Velocity and Darwin (MVD) terms are considered (23). This follows from the fact that in the MVD approximation one uses the approximate relativistic hamiltonian as an external perturbation with the nonrelativistic wave function as a reference. At the SCF and CASSCF levels one can obtain the MVD quasi-relativistic correction as an expectation value of the MVD operator. In perturbative CASPT2 and CC methods one needs to use the MVD operator as an external perturbation either within the finite field approach or by the analytical derivative schems. The first approach leads to certain numerical accuracy problems. [Pg.259]

The basis sets described above are small and intended for qualitative or semiquantitative, rather than quantitative, work. They are used mostly for simple wave functions consisting of one or a few Slater determinants such as the Hartree-Fock wave function, as discussed in Sec. 3. For the more advanced wave functions discussed in Sec. 4, it has been proven important to introduce hierarchies of basis sets. New AOs are introduced in a systematic manner, generating not only more accurate Hartree-Fock orbitals but also a suitable orbital space for including more and more Slater determinants in the n-electron expansion. In terms of these basis sets, determinant expansions (Eq. (14)) that systematically approach the exact wave function can be constructed. The atomic natural orbital (ANO) basis sets of Almlof and Taylor [23] were among the first examples of such systematic sequences of basis sets. The ANO sets have later been modified and extended by Widmark et al. [24],... [Pg.63]

Unlike the CNDO model, however, it is difficult to formulate a basis set or a systematic rule that generates the INDO model. Rather INDO is generated from CNDO by including the next largest two-electron terms, and those that are known to have importance in spectroscopy. In contrast, the neglect of differential diatomic overlap (NDDO) model can be derived from the replacement... [Pg.321]

As in most. systematically done and well-controlled experimental series, results can be reevaluated later on for additional purposes. In this set, the heat generation rates were evaluated with the help of the heats of reaction, at every temperature used. These in turn formed the basis for evaluation of temperature amaway conditions, as will be shown in Chapter 9. [Pg.103]


See other pages where Basis sets systematic generation is mentioned: [Pg.163]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.824]    [Pg.847]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.1133]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.355]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.285 ]




SEARCH



Basis sets generation

Systematic generation

© 2024 chempedia.info