Basis sets generation

In die Pople family of basis sets, the presence of diffuse functions is indicated by a + in die basis set name. Thus, 6-31- -G(d) indicates that heavy atoms have been augmented with an additional one s and one set of p functions having small exponents. A second plus indicates the presence of diffuse s functions on H, e.g., 6-311- -- -G(3df,2pd). For the Pople basis sets, die exponents for the diffuse functions were variationally optimized on the anionic one-heavy-atom hydrides, e.g., BH2 , and are die same for 3-21G, 6-3IG, and 6-3IIG. In the general case, a rough rule of thumb is diat diffuse functions should have an exponent about a factor of four smaller than the smallest valence exponent. Diffuse sp sets have also been defined for use in conjunction widi die MIDI and MIDIY basis sets, generating MIDIX+ and MIDIY-I-, respectively (Lynch and Truhlar 2004) the former basis set appears pardcularly efficient for the computation of accurate electron affinities. 

An overview of the development of the finite difference Hartree-Fock method is presented. Some examples of it axe given construction of sequences of highly accurate basis sets, generation of exact solutions of diatomic states, Cl with numerical molecular orbitals, Dirac-Hartree-Fock method based on a second-order Dirac equation. 

Benkova, Z., Sadlej, A. J., Oakes, R. E., and Bell, S. E. J. (2005a). Reduced-size polarized basis sets for calculations of molecular electric properties. I. The basis set generation. J. Comput. Chem., 26, 145-153. 

The LMTO method [58, 79] can be considered to be the linear version of the KKR teclmique. According to official LMTO historians, the method has now reached its third generation [79] the first starting with Andersen in 1975 [58], the second connnonly known as TB-LMTO. In the LMTO approach, the wavefimction is expanded in a basis of so-called muffin-tin orbitals. These orbitals are adapted to the potential by constmcting them from solutions of the radial Scln-ddinger equation so as to fomi a minimal basis set. Interstitial properties are represented by Hankel fiinctions, which means that, in contrast to the LAPW teclmique, the orbitals are localized in real space. The small basis set makes the method fast computationally, yet at the same time it restricts the accuracy. The localization of the basis fiinctions diminishes the quality of the description of the wavefimction in die interstitial region. 

This algorithm alternates between the electronic structure problem and the nuclear motion It turns out that to generate an accurate nuclear trajectory using this decoupled algoritlun th electrons must be fuUy relaxed to the ground state at each iteration, in contrast to Ihe Car-Pairinello approach, where some error is tolerated. This need for very accurate basis se coefficients means that the minimum in the space of the coefficients must be located ver accurately, which can be computationally very expensive. However, conjugate gradient rninimisation is found to be an effective way to find this minimum, especially if informatioi from previous steps is incorporated [Payne et cd. 1992]. This reduces the number of minimi sation steps required to locate accurately the best set of basis set coefficients. 

The Foek matriees (and orbital energies) were generated using standard ST03G minimum basis set SCF ealeulations. The Foek matriees are in the orthogonal basis formed from these orbitals. 

The orbital energies were generated using standard ST03G minimum basis set SCF ealeulations. 

Most of the techniques described in this Chapter are of the ab initio type. This means that they attempt to compute electronic state energies and other physical properties, as functions of the positions of the nuclei, from first principles without the use or knowledge of experimental input. Although perturbation theory or the variational method may be used to generate the working equations of a particular method, and although finite atomic orbital basis sets are nearly always utilized, these approximations do not involve fitting to known experimental data. They represent approximations that can be systematically improved as the level of treatment is enhanced. 

The complete neglect of differential overlap (CNDO) method is the simplest of the neglect of differential overlap (NDO) methods. This method models valence orbitals only using a minimal basis set of Slater type orbitals. The CNDO method has proven useful for some hydrocarbon results but little else. CNDO is still sometimes used to generate the initial guess for ah initio calculations on hydrocarbons. 

The band-structure code, called BAND, also uses STO basis sets with STO fit functions or numerical atomic orbitals. Periodicity can be included in one, two, or three dimensions. No geometry optimization is available for band-structure calculations. The wave function can be decomposed into Mulliken, DOS, PDOS, and COOP plots. Form factors and charge analysis may also be generated. 

Notice that NewZMat has set up a Hartree-Fock calculation by default, using the 6-31G(d) basis set. The molecule specification in the generated file is also in Z-matrix format rather than Cartesian coordinates. You can now edit this file to modify the procedure, basis set, and type of run desired. We won t bother running this file, since it is the same job as the one we just completed. 

---