Basis coordinates

As indicated above there may be many equivalent matrix representations for a given operation in a point group. Although the form depends on the choice of basis coordinates, the character is Independent of such a choice. However, for each application there exists a particular set of basis coordinates in terms of which the representation matrix is reduced to block-diagonal form. This result is shown symbolically in Fig. 4. ft can be expressed mathematically by the relation... 

Here, I as given by the direct sum, is a (reducible) representation of a given operation, R, Its trace is the character, a quantity that is independent of tire choice of basis coordinates. As xr is merely the sum of the diagonal elements of T, it is also equal to the sum of the traces of the individual submatrices... 

Coordinates such as these, which have the symmetry properties of the point group are known as symmetry coordinates. As they transform in the same manner as the IRs when used as basis coordinates, they factor the secular determinant into block-diagonal form. Thus, while normal coordinates most be found to diagonalize the secular determinant, the factorization resulting horn the use of symmetry coordinates often provides considerable simplification of the vibrational problem. Furthermore, symmetry coordinates can be chosen a priori by a simple analysis of the molecular structure. 

In the examples presented in the previous section, the vectors % of displace meat coordinates [Eqs. (12) and (19)] were used as a basis. It should not be surprising that the matrices employed to represent the symmetry operations have different forms depending on the basis coordinates. In effect, there is an infinite number of matrices that can serve as representations of a given symmetry operation. Nevertheless, there is one quantity that is characteristic of the operation - the trace of the matrix - as it is invariant under a change of basis coordinates. In group theory it is known as the character. 

To show that the character is invariant under a change of basis coordinates,... 

The vibrations may be described by different sets of basis coordinates. To start with, there are the changes of the 3n Cartesian coordinates X of the molecule. Chemists favor descriptions of the motions and the force constants in terms of bond lengths and bond angles. These are known as internal coordinates R. The equivalent internal coordinates of a molecule which possesses a certain symmetry, may change either in-phase or out-of-phase. The simultaneously occurring relative changes of the bond parameters of equivalent bonds are described by symmetry coordinates S. Normal coordinates Q describe motions as linear combinations of any set of basis coordinates. Different coordinate. systems can be transformed into each other by matrix multiplication. For further details, see Sec. 5.2. 

Type 1 The organizations involved recognize each other as partners and, on a limited basis, coordinate activities and planning. The partnership usually has a short-term focus and involves only one division or functional area within each organization. 

In the context of particle motion it is quite common to describe the fluid field in curvilinear coordinates (e.g. spherical coordinates), which leads to a less elegant description of momentum conservation than given in Eq. (B.6) because the direction of the basis coordinates is not fixed (Landau and Lifshitz 1987, pp. 44-51). 

When two representations of a group differ only in that the basis coordinates of one are linear combinations, as in (6), of the basis coordinates of the other, the two representations are said to be equivalent. Equiv-... 

In the annealed cylinder the presence of own compressive stress has been observed, which was disclosed as lack of indications changes in the initial stretching phase, and their value may be evaluated on the basis of extrapolating the graphs to the coordinate axis. 

The corresponding fiinctions i-, Xj etc. then define what are known as the normal coordinates of vibration, and the Hamiltonian can be written in tenns of these in precisely the fonn given by equation (AT 1.69). witli the caveat that each tenn refers not to the coordinates of a single particle, but rather to independent coordinates that involve the collective motion of many particles. An additional distinction is that treatment of the vibrational problem does not involve the complications of antisymmetry associated with identical fennions and the Pauli exclusion prmciple. Products of the nonnal coordinate fiinctions neveitlieless describe all vibrational states of the molecule (both ground and excited) in very much the same way that the product states of single-electron fiinctions describe the electronic states, although it must be emphasized that one model is based on independent motion and the other on collective motion, which are qualitatively very different. Neither model faithfully represents reality, but each serves as an extremely usefiil conceptual model and a basis for more accurate calculations. 

The empirical pseiidopotential method can be illustrated by considering a specific semiconductor such as silicon. The crystal structure of Si is diamond. The structure is shown in figure Al.3.4. The lattice vectors and basis for a primitive cell have been defined in the section on crystal structures (ATS.4.1). In Cartesian coordinates, one can write G for the diamond structure as... 

It would appear that identical particle pemuitation groups are not of help in providing distinguishing syimnetry labels on molecular energy levels as are the other groups we have considered. However, they do provide very usefiil restrictions on the way we can build up the complete molecular wavefiinction from basis fiinctions. Molecular wavefiinctions are usually built up from basis fiinctions that are products of electronic and nuclear parts. Each of these parts is fiirther built up from products of separate uncoupled coordinate (or orbital) and spin basis fiinctions. Wlien we combine these separate fiinctions, the final overall product states must confonn to the pemuitation syimnetry mles that we stated above. This leads to restrictions in the way that we can combine the uncoupled basis fiinctions. 

One possibility is to use hyperspherical coordinates, as these enable the use of basis fiinctions which describe reagent and product internal states in the same expansion. Hyperspherical coordinates have been extensively discussed in the literature [M, 35 and 36] and in the present application they reduce to polar coordinates (p, p) defined as follows ... 

Since the vibrational eigenstates of the ground electronic state constitute an orthonomial basis set, tire off-diagonal matrix elements in equation (B 1.3.14) will vanish unless the ground state electronic polarizability depends on nuclear coordinates. (This is the Raman analogue of the requirement in infrared spectroscopy that, to observe a transition, the electronic dipole moment in the ground electronic state must properly vary with nuclear displacements from... 

In this section, we concentrate on the relationship between diffraction pattern and surface lattice [5], In direct analogy with the tln-ee-dimensional bulk case, the surface lattice is defined by two vectors a and b parallel to the surface (defined already above), subtended by an angle y a and b together specify one unit cell, as illustrated in figure B1.21.4. Withm that unit cell atoms are arranged according to a basis, which is the list of atomic coordinates within drat unit cell we need not know these positions for the purposes of this discussion. Note that this unit cell can be viewed as being infinitely deep in the third dimension (perpendicular to the surface), so as to include all atoms below the surface to arbitrary depth. 

For both types of orbitals, the coordinates r, 0 and cji refer to the position of the electron relative to a set of axes attached to the centre on which the basis orbital is located. Although STOs have the proper cusp behaviour near the nuclei, they are used primarily for atomic- and linear-molecule calculations because the multi-centre integrals which arise in polyatomic-molecule calculations caimot efficiently be perfonned when STOs are employed. In contrast, such integrals can routinely be done when GTOs are used. This fiindamental advantage of GTOs has led to the dominance of these fimetions in molecular quantum chemistry. 

Bacic Z, Kress J D, Parker G A and Pack R T 1990 Quantum reactive scattering in 3 dimensions using hyperspherical (APH) coordinates. 4. discrete variable representation (DVR) basis functions and the analysis of accurate results for F + Hg d. Chem. Phys. 92 2344... 

The electronic energy W in the Bom-Oppenlieimer approxunation can be written as W= fV(q, p), where q is the vector of nuclear coordinates and the vector p contains the parameters of the electronic wavefimction. The latter are usually orbital coefficients, configuration amplitudes and occasionally nonlinear basis fiinction parameters, e.g., atomic orbital positions and exponents. The electronic coordinates have been integrated out and do not appear in W. Optimizing the electronic parameters leaves a function depending on the nuclear coordinates only, E = (q). We will assume that both W q, p) and (q) and their first derivatives are continuous fimctions of the variables q- and py... 

The ordinary BO approximate equations failed to predict the proper symmetry allowed transitions in the quasi-JT model whereas the extended BO equation either by including a vector potential in the system Hamiltonian or by multiplying a phase factor onto the basis set can reproduce the so-called exact results obtained by the two-surface diabatic calculation. Thus, the calculated hansition probabilities in the quasi-JT model using the extended BO equations clearly demonshate the GP effect. The multiplication of a phase factor with the adiabatic nuclear wave function is an approximate treatment when the position of the conical intersection does not coincide with the origin of the coordinate axis, as shown by the results of [60]. Moreover, even if the total energy of the system is far below the conical intersection point, transition probabilities in the JT model clearly indicate the importance of the extended BO equation and its necessity. 

This makes it desirable to define other representations in addition to the electronically adiabatic one [Eqs. (9)-(12)], in which the adiabatic electronic wave function basis set used in the Bom-Huang expansion (12) is replaced by another basis set of functions of the electronic coordinates. Such a different electronic basis set can be chosen so as to minimize the above mentioned gradient term. This term can initially be neglected in the solution of the / -electionic-state nuclear motion Schrodinger equation and reintroduced later using perturbative or other methods, if desired. This new basis set of electronic wave functions can also be made to depend parametrically, like their adiabatic counterparts, on the internal nuclear coordinates q that were defined after Eq. (8). This new electronic basis set is henceforth refened to as diabatic and, as is obvious, leads to an electronically diabatic representation that is not unique unlike the adiabatic one, which is unique by definition. 

For bound state systems, eigenfunctions of the nuclear Hamiltonian can be found by diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matiix in Eq. (11). These functions are the possible nuclear states of the system, that is, the vibrational states. If these states are used as a basis set, the wave function after excitation is a superposition of these vibrational states, with expansion coefficients given by the Frank-Condon overlaps. In this picture, the dynamics in Figure 4 can be described by the time evolution of these expansion coefficients, a simple phase factor. The periodic motion in coordinate space is thus related to a discrete spectrum in energy space. 

The simplest way to add a non-adiabatic correction to the classical BO dynamics method outlined above in Section n.B is to use what is known as surface hopping. First introduced on an intuitive basis by Bjerre and Nikitin [200] and Tully and Preston [201], a number of variations have been developed [202-205], and are reviewed in [28,206]. Reference [204] also includes technical details of practical algorithms. These methods all use standard classical trajectories that use the hopping procedure to sample the different states, and so add non-adiabatic effects. A different scheme was introduced by Miller and George [207] which, although based on the same ideas, uses complex coordinates and momenta. 

In general, at least three anchors are required as the basis for the loop, since the motion around a point requires two independent coordinates. However, symmetry sometimes requires a greater number of anchors. A well-known case is the Jahn-Teller degeneracy of perfect pentagons, heptagons, and so on, which will be covered in Section V. Another special case arises when the electronic wave function of one of the anchors is an out-of-phase combination of two spin-paired structures. One of the vibrational modes of the stable molecule in this anchor serves as the out-of-phase coordinate, and the loop is constructed of only two anchors (see Fig. 12). 

---