Diabatic base electronic states

The treatment developed here is based on the density matrix of quantum mechanics and extends previous work using wavefunctions.(42 5) The density matrix approach treats all energetically accessible electronic states in the same fashion, and naturally leads to average effective potentials which have been shown to give accurate results for electronically diabatic collisions. 19) The approach is taken here for systems where the dynamics can be described by a Hamiltonian operator, as it is possible for isolated molecules or in models where environmental effects can be represented by terms in an effective Hamiltonian. 

In coordinate representation, there exists alternative base representations, adiabatic and diabatic. Both representations are equivalent if the basis are complete. For a thorough discussion on adiabatic-diabatic electronic state transformations the reader is referred to the work by Baer [49, 50], see also the work by Chapuisat et al. [51] In this... 

The key to get a diabatic electronic state is a strict constraint i.e. keep local symmetry elements invariant. For ethylene, let us start from the cis con-former case. The nuclear geometry of the attractor must be on the (y,z)-plane according to Fig.l. The reaction coordinate must be the dis-rotatory displacement. Due to the nature of the LCAO-MO model in quantum computing chemistry, the closed shell filling of the HOMO must change into a closed shell of the LUMO beyond 0=n/4. The symmetry of the diabatic wave function is hence respected. Mutatis mutandis, the trans conformer wave function before n/4 corresponds to a double filling of the LUMO beyond the n/4 point on fills the HOMO twice. At n/4 there is the diradical singlet and triplet base wavefunctions. 

The theoretical description of photochemistry is historically based on the diabatic representation, where the diabatic models have been given the generic label desorption induced by electronic transitions (DIET) [91]. Such theories were originally developed by Menzel, Gomer and Redhead (MGR) [92,93] for repulsive excited states and later generalized to attractive excited states by Antoniewicz [94]. There are many mechanisms by which photons can induce photochemistry/desorption direct optical excitation of the adsorbate, direct optical excitation of the metal-adsorbate complex (i.e., via a charge-transfer band) or indirectly via substrate mediated excitation (e-h pairs). The differences in these mechanisms lie principally in how localized the relevant electron and hole created by the light are on the adsorbate. 

In one quantum mechanical approach based on the diabatic approximation , the electron is assumed to be confined initially at one of the reactant sites and electron transfer is treated as a transition between the vibrational levels of the reactants to those of the products. The quantum mechanical treatment begins with the time dependent Schrodinger equation, Hip = -ihSiplSt, where the wavefunction tj/ is written as a sum of the initial (reactant) and final (product) states. In the limit that the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation for the separation of electronic and nuclear motion is valid, the time dependent Schrodinger equation eventually leads to the Golden Rule result in equation (25). 

Bianco et al. [23] proposed a direct VB wavefunction method combined with a PCM approach to study chemical reactions in solution. Their approach is based on a Cl expansion of the wavefunction in terms of VB resonance structures, treated as diabatic electronic states. Each diabatic component is assumed to be unchanged by the interaction with the solvent the solvent effects are exclusively reflected by the variation of the coefficients of the VB expansion. The advantage of this choice is related to its easy interpretability. The method has been applied to the study of the several SN1/2 reactions. 

We have described a mixed MOVB model for describing the potential energy surface of reactive systems, and presented results from applications to SN2 reactions in aqueous solution. The MOVB model is based on a BLW method to define diabatic electronic state functions. Then, a configuration interaction Hamiltonian is constructed using these diabatic VB states as basis functions. The computed geometrical and energetic results for these systems are in accord with previous experimental and theoretical studies. These studies show that the MOVB model can be adequately used as a mapping potential to derive solvent reaction coordinates for... 

The preceding discussion has been based on the assumption of orthonormal electronic states (see Eq. 14). In some cases it is advantageous to employ a non-orthogonal diabatic basis, especially when Tg is evaluated directly in terms of variationally determined charge-localized SCF [34] (or, in some cases, correlated [116a]) wavefunctions, which are generally nonorthogonal ... 

The above consideration, based on parabolic surfaces (50.1), illustrates a simple example of a correlation between classical activation energy and reaction heat. Such a correlation is also to be expected, however, under certain conditions for more complicated potential energy surfaces. If, for instance, the electronic state of products is changed in any way, then the whole "diabatic" surface alters, so that, in the general case, both the saddle-point and the minimum energy difference ( aV s q) of reactants and products change simultaneously. The dependence E (Q) may be, in general, a compli-cated function however, a simple relationship, which is valid for many reactions in gas and dense phases, can be derived in the way described below. 

Such methods can be formulated in terms of either the diabatic or the adiabatic representation. They are based on the observation that the exact eigenfunction of a system of two electronic states can be written in either of the forms... 

To perform the following illustrative calculations, on the other hand, we first prepared the two adiabatic states as above in Eq. (6.99) and assumed the presence of a set of diabatic matrix elements through the rotation angle, Eq. (6.102), which automatically gives both h[P and X12. We thus can perform all the necessary procedures for nonadiabatic dynamics including the electronic state components C, C2 of Eq. (6.13) without necessity of referring to the explicit functional form of the electronic bases /(r R). 

While, as discussed above, general solutions to the multistate nonadiabatic problem in Eq. 8.6 are out of reach for large systems, the latter can be suitably tackled for semirigid systems due to MVCM models based on a quasi-diabatic description of the electronic states. Such models allow for effective computations when the harmonic approximation is, at least, a good starting point for the description of the diabatic... 

---