Diabatic approximations

In one quantum mechanical approach based on the diabatic approximation , the electron is assumed to be confined initially at one of the reactant sites and electron transfer is treated as a transition between the vibrational levels of the reactants to those of the products. The quantum mechanical treatment begins with the time dependent Schrodinger equation, Hip = -ihSiplSt, where the wavefunction tj/ is written as a sum of the initial (reactant) and final (product) states. In the limit that the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation for the separation of electronic and nuclear motion is valid, the time dependent Schrodinger equation eventually leads to the Golden Rule result in equation (25). 

Ktatement of the adiabatic condition [Eq. (9.40)] shows that the breakdown of the diabatic approximation is due to the near divergence of the complex mixing angle a pc Eq. (11.12) at small Ai, the complex nature of which is a result of the presence of final continuum. 

The DMC method is compared with a variational method within a vibrational diabatic approximation (VDA) applied to the halogen vibrational motion for both the triatomic and the tetraatomic complex. Hereafter we shall call this procedure diabatic DMC (DDMC). 

In Table 2 the vdWenergies of ChHe and ChHe2 determined by the variational and the DMC method, in the scheme of the diabatic separation, are presented. It can be noticed that energies within both approaches differ at most by 0.1 cm" . This result confirms the validity of the diffusion Monte Carlo method to provide accurate energy levels of quasibound states within a vibrational diabatic approximation. 

This model can be commonly used to describe the Cl of tm and nn electronic states of the pyrazine molecule. Near the bottom of the two potential surfaces, the two electronic states in the diabatic approximation are described by j(njt ) and The adiabatic approximation and b wiU be employed to describe the electronic states in the Cl region. Thus,... 

Simple examples of these effects were discussed in Section IV as limiting cases of the pseudo-Jahn Teller and pseudo-Renner-Teller effects. There it was shown that instead of using the adiabatic approximation, we should, in the interest of convenience, adopt a diabatic approximation in which the electronic degeneracy is maintained in zeroth order. The splitting can then simply be ascribed to adiabatic coupling proportional to Q, (or Qf, etc.) or to Qf (or Qf, etc.) between the two electronic components that remain degenerate at Q, = 0. The selection rule for pseudo-Jahn Teller coupling is thus <0° 0 or, iff denotes representation, T , x F,- x F 3-4,. 

The Landau-Zener transition probability is derived from an approximation to the frill two-state impact-parameter treatment of the collision. The single passage probability for a transition between the diabatic surfaces H, (/ ) and R AR) which cross at is the Landau-Zener transition probability... 

Here the transition state is approximated by the lowest crossing pomt on the seam intersecting the diabatic (non-interacting) potential energy surfaces of the reactant and product. The method was originally developed... 

McDouall J J W, Robb M A and Bernard F 1986 An efficient algorithm for the approximate location of transition structures in a diabatic surface formalism Chem. Phys. Lett. 129 595... 

In this section, we prove that the non-adiabatic matiices have to be quantized ( similar to Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization of the angulai momentum) in order to yield a continous, uniquely defined, diabatic potential matrix W(i). In another way, the extended BO approximation will be applied only to those cases that fulfill these quantization rules. The ADT matrix A(s,so) transforms a given adiabatic potential matiix u(i) to a diabatic matiix W(s, so)... 

The ordinary BO approximate equations failed to predict the proper symmetry allowed transitions in the quasi-JT model whereas the extended BO equation either by including a vector potential in the system Hamiltonian or by multiplying a phase factor onto the basis set can reproduce the so-called exact results obtained by the two-surface diabatic calculation. Thus, the calculated hansition probabilities in the quasi-JT model using the extended BO equations clearly demonshate the GP effect. The multiplication of a phase factor with the adiabatic nuclear wave function is an approximate treatment when the position of the conical intersection does not coincide with the origin of the coordinate axis, as shown by the results of [60]. Moreover, even if the total energy of the system is far below the conical intersection point, transition probabilities in the JT model clearly indicate the importance of the extended BO equation and its necessity. 

Obviously, the fact that the solution of the adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation matrix is only perturbed to second order makes the present approach rather attractive. It not only results in a very efficient approximation but also yields an estimate for the error made in applying the approximation. 

It is to be emphasized that, despite the formal similarity, the physical problems are different. Moreover, in general, diabatic coupling is not small, unlike the tunneling matrix element, and this circumstance does not allow one to apply the noninteracting blip approximation. So even having been formulated in the standard spin-boson form, the problem still remains rather sophisticated. In particular, it is difficult to explore the intermediate region between nonadiabatic and adiabatic transition. 

Suppose at(w,0) kl > only the hP1 state of the system is present initially. The first term on the right of Eq. (7-73) can then contribute nothing to any state l that differs from k it will induce no transitions from the initial state. Retaining it alone constitutes the adiabatic approximation. The second term contributes to at(w,t) provided (il)uc is finite. It is the first diabatic term in the expansion. 

The plot of the pressure drop depending on the bulk velocity in adiabatic and diabatic flows is shown in Fig. 3.6a,b. The data related to the adiabatic flow correspond to constant temperature of the fluids Tjn = 25 °C, whereas in the diabatic flow the fluid temperature increased along micro-channel approximately from 40 to 60 °C. It is seen that in both cases the pressure drop for Habon G increases compared to clear water. The difference between pressure drop corresponding to flows of a surfactant solution and solvent increases with increasing bulk velocity. 

There are three ways of implementing the GP boundary condition. These are (1) to expand the wave function in terms of basis functions that themselves satisfy the GP boundary condition [16] (2) to use the vector-potential approach of Mead and Truhlar [6,64] and (3) to convert to an approximately diabatic representation [3, 52, 65, 66], where the effect of the GP is included exactly through the adiabatic-diabatic mixing angle. Of these, (1) is probably the most... 

The closer the trajectory approaches the conical intersection, the smaller Cy becomes. Since the nonadiabatic transitions are expected to take place in the close vicinity of the conical intersection, the nonadiabatic transition direction can be approximated by the eigenvector of the Hessian d AV/dRidRj corresponding to its maximum eigenvalue. Similar arguments hold for nonadiabatic transitions near the crossing seam surface, in which case the nondiagonal elements of the diabatic Hamiltonian of Eq. (1) should be taken as nonzero constant. 

The aim of this work is to obtain the four lowest E curves and wavefunctions of BH at the same level of accuracy and to bring out the interplay of ionic, Rydberg and valence states at energies and internuclear distances which were not previously investigated. We have therefore made use of a method, already put forward by us [16,17] to determine at once quasi-diabatic and adiabatic states, potential energy cnrves and approximate nonadiabatic couplings. We have analogously determined the first three E+ states, of which only the lowest had been theoretically studied... 

---