Bargaining Theory

Bargaining theory being a somewhat arcane subject, (he following exposition is even further removed from rigorous analysis than elsewhere in this book. 

Keywords Bargaining Theory, Game Theory, Auctions, Supply Chain Intermediary, Sup-... 

As discussed throughout the chapter, the viewpoints offered by the supply chain intermediary theory and the bargaining theory could potentially broaden the scope for supply chain coordination. In the following, we outline a few research opportunities offered by the proposed paradigm. 

Sta hi, I. (1972). Bargaining theory. Stockholm Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm. 

Sutton, J. (1986). Noncooperative bargaining theory an introduction. Rev. Econom. Stud., 53(5) 709-724. 

Muthoo, A., 2000. A Non-Technical Introduction to Bargaining Theory. http //privatewww.essex.ac.uk/ muthoo. Revision September 2004. 

Muthoo, A., 2002. Bargaining theory with applications. Cambridge University Press. 

At the societal level, they imply an anemic view of justice, as London pointed out. They rebuff any commitment to a substantive theory of justice. They only require procedures such as the approval by the community and/or the local research ethics committee. What is more, they do not commit themselves to basic conditions for such procedures to be acceptable. They naturalize the extreme and desperate situation of such communities as the baseline. Furthermore, they do not recognize the influence this baseline condition may have in the bargaining process. They force people to expose themselves in order to achieve or protect such basic goods as health or life. This fact seems to put the research subject in an unfair position or, as Ballantyne (2004) has argued, in a situation of exploitation a mutually advantageous exploitation. This means that research (or any transaction) can be simultaneously mutually beneficial and yet also unfair. 

The theory of coalitions is a technically formidable topic, hard to convey by simple examples and intuitive reasoning. I will leave it, therefore, at this point. Fortunately, in a sense, not much is lost, since the theory has few robust results. In another sense, of course, this is most unfortunate, because bargaining and coalition formation are massively imponant facts of social life. 

The main goal of this book is to show how a scientific theory of dreaming has been developed and strengthened over the past 50 years. In the process, the book offers the reader a unique opportunity to reconsider his or her own dream theory and, into the bargain, to learn about the fascinating discoveries of modern sleep science. 

On the other hand there can be no doubt that imperfections of competition are massively important in actual capitalist economies, and that the Marxist theory of exploitation ultimately will have to consider the implications of this fact. 1 shall not here pursue the issue, but indicate where some further discussions are found. In 4.1.4 I consider collective bargaining as a determinant of the rate of exploitation. In particular, I discuss a passage from Capital III that has been adduced as evidence that Marx believed the wage bargain to rest on bilateral monopoly. In 4.3.3 I propose a distinction between force and coercion in the labour market, the latter involving the exercise of (economic) power. And in 6.2.1 I discuss how capitalist divide-and-conquer tactics may also affect the rate of exploitation. 

In any event, such a theory to justify the fascination exerted by detective and mystery stories is elitist and falsely elitist into the bargain. It distracts our attention with a pretentious and tenuous explanation in place of a much more interesting and persuasive one namely, that detective stories are appealing because they depict life not as it is but in some sense as it ought to be. 

Crawford, V., and Varian, H. (1979), "Distortion of preferences and the Nash theory of bargaining," Economic Letters 3,203-6. 

A second theory simply proposes that unions act instrumentally as utility maximizers for the entire bargaining unit their goal is to maximize either utility per worker or the total utility of the workforce, depending on how they approach it. In either case the result would be nearly identical to the median voter rule, at least as far as the tradeoff between safety and wages is concerned, since it approximates what most workers want. Again collective bargaining works. ... 

From the above discussion, it is interesting to note that the theoretical underpinning of multilateral trade is directly linked to the bilateral bargaining situation, and both can be interpreted in the context of pricing problem in microeconomics theory. 

Ponsati, C. and Sakovics, J. (1998). Rubinstein bargaining with two-sided outside options. Econom. Theory, ll(3) 667-672. 

---