Bandgap, definition

As a working definition, a surface state can be any electron energy level within the bandgap of the semiconductor located at its surface that is coupled to the semiconductor lattice strongly enough to allow inelastic capture of carriers from the semiconductor bands. Several examples of possible surface states are illustrated in Figure 2. In the next section experimental manifestations of some of these are described. 

A working definition of a surface state as any energy level within the bandgap that is bound to the surface sufficiently to allow inelastic electron transfer to or from the semiconductor bonds was introduced. This allows adsorbed electrolyte species, reaction intermediates and attached layers to be considered as surface states. The experimental observations discussed illustrate such states. 

Recently, a second-order nonlinear photonic crystal has been realized.38 In this nonlinear optical bandgap material, there is a periodicity in the nonlinear optical properties of the engineered material. With this definition, a periodically poled second-order nonlinear optical material could be called a nonlinear photonic crystal. However, its linear optical properties do not show a periodicity, except for the (small and useless for bireffingent phase-matching) poling-induced birefringence. Here, the material is the same in the complete structure. It is only periodically made into a non-centrosymmetric structure for second-order nonlinear and phase-matching... 

In order to solve these problems, it is very important and useful to clarify band structures of group-III nitrides and their QW structures and also to obtain their band structure parameters. In this Datareview, definitions of band structure parameters and available data on them for GaN and AIN are given. The data are mainly about theoretical results with first-principles band structure calculations within the local density functional approximation (LDA). They are compared with currently available experimental results. Note that the LDA calculation grossly underestimates a bandgap and that it gives almost zero bandgap for InN. Such a calculation is unlikely to yield reliable parameters for InN, especially effective masses. Therefore, the band structure parameters of InN are not given in this Datareview. 

Fig. 7.1 Density of states (DOS) for different semiconducting behaviour, a Bandgap in a crystalline semiconductor, b A semi-metaUic liquid where Ef is located in a minimum in the DOS. c A narrow definition liquid semiconductor where Ef is located in a minimum consisting of localized states, d A narrow definition liquid semiconductor because n(E) = 0 where Ef is located...

For all systems studied, the relative changes in bandgap are of the order of 0.5 eV and are definitely measurable in experimental conditions. 

Write out detailed definitions, with illustrations if appropriate, for the following terms Chronovoltabsorptometry oxidative and reductive Switching Times Electrochromic, Electrochemical and Charge Cyclabilities Charge Capacity Dynamic Range Open Circuit Memory Bandgap Solar Absorptance Thermal Emittance. 

The straightness of the line is not proof of that relationship because we used the relationship to determine the cutoff when a bandgap (but not a cutoff) was available, and vice versa. In fact, the reported cutoffs often differ by as much as 10% from the theoretical values, in part because the reported bandgaps and cutoffs were determined under different conditions, and because different definitions of cutoff are sometimes used. 

---