Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Average values standard

It is very important to report the results of analyses in ways that are readily and unambiguously understood. The methods used to determine average values, standard deviations, confidence intervals, uncertainties etc. must be clearly defined. In some application areas, the concept of a reporting limit is useful it is stated that the concentration of the analyte is not less than a particular value. Prudence indicates that this limit should be greater than the limit of detection (see Section 2.3). Use of an appropriate number of significant figures is also critical in reporting results, as this indicates the precision of the measurements. [Pg.74]

Average Value Standard Error. GA, Greater Accra CR, Central, AR, Ashanti, ER, Eastern, WR, Western... [Pg.367]

Figure 11.4 Effect of laboratory (a) and field (b) exposure on Fulton s condition factor (FCF) and lipid budgets in carp. The FCF is indicated in the line plot and lipid budgets in the vertical bars. Shading indicates effluent percentage from 0% (white) to 100% (black). Grey bars are intermediate effluent percentages. Data are average values standard deviations (n=5). Figure 11.4 Effect of laboratory (a) and field (b) exposure on Fulton s condition factor (FCF) and lipid budgets in carp. The FCF is indicated in the line plot and lipid budgets in the vertical bars. Shading indicates effluent percentage from 0% (white) to 100% (black). Grey bars are intermediate effluent percentages. Data are average values standard deviations (n=5).
All values in m% and expressed as average value standard deviation (number of results). [Pg.90]

Table 1. Average Values ( Standard Deviation) for PLL(20)-g[3.5]-PEG(5), Adsorbed on a Silica Substrate Surface, of the Wet Mass Density, wei, the Dry Mass Density, mdry, the Solvation, W, the Number of Solvent Molecules per EG Monomer Averaged over the Cross Section of the PEG Brush, A mig, and the Coefficient of Friction for Symmetric (Silicon Wafer and Colloidal Probe Coated with PLL-g-PEG), and Asymmetric (Silicon Wafer Coated with PLL-g-PEG,... Table 1. Average Values ( Standard Deviation) for PLL(20)-g[3.5]-PEG(5), Adsorbed on a Silica Substrate Surface, of the Wet Mass Density, wei, the Dry Mass Density, mdry, the Solvation, W, the Number of Solvent Molecules per EG Monomer Averaged over the Cross Section of the PEG Brush, A mig, and the Coefficient of Friction for Symmetric (Silicon Wafer and Colloidal Probe Coated with PLL-g-PEG), and Asymmetric (Silicon Wafer Coated with PLL-g-PEG,...
FIGURE 8.26 Correlation between modulus of compressibility and average value standard penetration test (SPT) blow count. (After D Appoloniaetal., ASCE Journal ofSoil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 96, No. SM2, pp. 754-761, 1970.)... [Pg.226]

The r-coordinates of the theoretical dimensionless drop profiles were overlapped with random errors ranging from —0.025 to 0.025. The results are shown here as average value standard derivation, which were evaluated from 40 simulations (cf. text). [Pg.452]

Average values Standard General Average value Standard General... [Pg.171]

A total of 47,690 signal position data was abstracted for 6,632 kinds of such atomic groups. As shown in Table 5, average value, standard deviation, and maximum and minimum values of atomic groups are then calculated. The atomic groups in the table are represented by means of CANOST codes which are used in CANOST notation system employed for representing structural formulae in the data file. [Pg.27]

Bond lengths are given in A and angles in rad. For average values, standard deviations are shown 1.099 (6) means that the average is 1.099 A with a standard deviation of 0.006 A. This gives no information about experimental accuracy for individual values we show the observed datum with three times the reported standard deviation of the measurement. In ethanol, C-O-H 1.873 (21) means that the C-O-H angle is 1.873 rad with a standard deviation on the measurement of 0.007 rad-... [Pg.89]

Once the least-squares fits to Slater functions with orbital exponents e = 1.0 are available, fits to Slater function s with oth er orbital expon cn ts can be obtained by siin ply m ii Itiplyin g th e cc s in th e above three equations by It remains to be determined what Slater orbital exponents to use in electronic structure calculation s. The two possibilities may be to use the "best atom" exponents (e = 1. f) for II. for exam pie) or to opiim i/e exponents in each calculation. The "best atom expon en ts m igh t be a rather poor ch oicc for mo lecular en viron men ts, and optirn i/.at ion of non linear exponents is not practical for large molecules, where the dimension of the space to be searched is very large.. 4 com prom isc is to use a set of standard exponents where the average values of expon en ts are optirn i/ed for a set of sin all rn olecules, fh e recom -mended STO-3G exponents are... [Pg.256]

If all sources of systematic error can be eliminated, there will still remain statistical errors. These errors are often reported as stcindard deviations. What we would particularly like to estimate is the error in the average value, (A). The standard deviation of the average value is calculated as follows ... [Pg.359]

The average value of the rephcates is reported along with the standard deviation, which reflects the variabihty in the measurement. Large standard deviations relative to the average measurement indicate the need for an action plan to improve measurement precision. This can be accomphshed through more rephcate measurements or the elimination of the source of variation, such as the imprecision of an instmment or poor temperature control during the measurement. [Pg.367]

Fig. 2. An SPC control chart of the purity analysis of a reference standard where (—) represents the average value and UCL and LCL are the upper and... Fig. 2. An SPC control chart of the purity analysis of a reference standard where (—) represents the average value and UCL and LCL are the upper and...
The suitabihty of the Gompertz fit to the cui ve can be assessed by comparing the values olb calculated from Eqs. (9-97) and (9-98), and, if suitable, the average value of b may be used in Eq. (9-99) to calculate the corresponding value of a to ensure a fit at the median and reasonable accuracy over the more important practical range within a couple of standard deviations on either side of the median. [Pg.825]

On Figure 6.3.1 the first line tells the date and duration of the experiment. In the third line the number of cycles is five. This indicates that feed and product streams were analyzed five times before an evaluation was made. The concentrations, and all other numbers are the average of the five repeated analyses with the standard deviation given for each average value. The RATE as 1/M means for each component the reaction rate in lb-moles per 1000 lbs of catalyst. [Pg.126]

Equation (14.94) is an average value for the most solids. This has a rather high standard deviation, which can be seen from Fig. 14.13. [Pg.1340]

Certain assumptions are usually made about an "average" person s attributes for risk assessments applied to large groups of individuals. List the standard values usually assigned to represent the "average" values for the following. [Pg.343]

Suppose that using Monte Carlo simulation witli 10 simulated values of Ta and 10 simulated values of Tb, it is desired to estimate an average value of Ts. First, 20 random numbers are generated. Tliese are shown in columns 1 and 4 of Table 20.6.2. Regard each of the random numbers generated as the value of tlie cdf of a standard nonnal variable Z. Let Zi be tlie simulated value of Z corresponding to 0.10, tlie first random number in colunm 1. Then, since 0.10 is tlie value of tlie cdf for Z = Zi,... [Pg.593]

Determine the response factors (r) for the detector relative to phenacetin ( = 1) as internal standard by carrying out three runs, using 1 /rL injection, and obtaining the average value of r. [Pg.233]

Here Ee is the standard potential of the reaction against the reference electrode used to measure the potential of the dropping electrode, and the potential E refers to the average value during the life of a mercury drop. Before the commencement of the polarographic wave only a small residual current flows, and the concentration of any electro-active substance must be the same at the electrode interface as in the bulk of the solution. As soon as the decomposition potential is exceeded, some of the reducible substance (oxidant) at the interface is reduced, and must be replenished from the body of the solution by means of diffusion. The reduction product (reductant) does not accumulate at the interface, but diffuses away from it into the solution or into the electrode material. If the applied potential is increased to a value at which all the oxidant reaching the interface is reduced, only the newly formed reductant will be present the current then flowing will be the diffusion current. The current / at any point... [Pg.599]

Table 4 summarizes the efficiency of this hybrid MFAJV/NF process. Reduction of conductivity, turbidity, suspended solids and TDS was close to 100%. Conductivity values were reduced down to average values of 200 pS cm while turbidity and TDS reached 1.2 NTU and 102 mg 1 respectively. Thus, regenerated water could meet the standards for cooling and boiler feedwater [11]. [Pg.119]


See other pages where Average values standard is mentioned: [Pg.274]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.2440]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.800]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.96]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 , Pg.92 , Pg.93 , Pg.94 , Pg.95 , Pg.96 , Pg.97 , Pg.98 , Pg.99 , Pg.100 , Pg.101 , Pg.102 , Pg.103 , Pg.104 , Pg.105 , Pg.106 ]




SEARCH



Average values standard affinity

Standard value

© 2024 chempedia.info