Atomic models electron-wave model

Small metal clusters are also of interest because of their importance in catalysis. Despite the fact that small clusters should consist of mostly surface atoms, measurement of the photon ionization threshold for Hg clusters suggest that a transition from van der Waals to metallic properties occurs in the range of 20-70 atoms per cluster [88] and near-bulk magnetic properties are expected for Ni, Pd, and Pt clusters of only 13 atoms [89] Theoretical calculations on Sin and other semiconductors predict that the stmcture reflects the bulk lattice for 1000 atoms but the bulk electronic wave functions are not obtained [90]. Bartell and co-workers [91] study beams of molecular clusters with electron dirfraction and molecular dynamics simulations and find new phases not observed in the bulk. Bulk models appear to be valid for their clusters of several thousand atoms (see Section IX-3). 

Valence bond and molecular orbital theory both incorporate the wave description of an atom s electrons into this picture of H2 but m somewhat different ways Both assume that electron waves behave like more familiar waves such as sound and light waves One important property of waves is called interference m physics Constructive interference occurs when two waves combine so as to reinforce each other (m phase) destructive interference occurs when they oppose each other (out of phase) (Figure 2 2) Recall from Section 1 1 that electron waves m atoms are characterized by their wave function which is the same as an orbital For an electron m the most stable state of a hydrogen atom for example this state is defined by the Is wave function and is often called the Is orbital The valence bond model bases the connection between two atoms on the overlap between half filled orbifals of fhe fwo afoms The molecular orbital model assembles a sef of molecular orbifals by combining fhe afomic orbifals of all of fhe atoms m fhe molecule... 

Some more recent software uses the tensor LEED approximation of Rous and Pen-dry which can save a substantial amount of computer time [2.268-2.270]. In tensor LEED the amplitudes (0) of all escaping electron waves (spots) are first calculated conventionally as described above for a certain reference geometry. Then the derivatives of these amplitudes 5Ag/5ri with respect to small displacements of each atom i in this reference geometry are calculated. These derivatives are the constituents of the "tensor". The wave amplitude for a modified model geometry where atom i is displaced by the vector Aq is then approximately given by ... 

A classical description of M can for example be a standard force field with (partial) atomic charges, while a quantum description involves calculation of the electronic wave function. The latter may be either a semi-empirical model, such as AMI or PM3, or any of the ab initio methods, i.e. HF, MCSCF, CISD, MP2 etc. Although the electrostatic potential can be derived directly from the electronic wave function, it is usually fitted to a set of atomic charges or multipoles, as discussed in Section 9.2, which then are used in the actual solvent model. 

In recent years the old quantum theory, associated principally with the names of Bohr and Sommerfeld, encountered a large number of difficulties, all of which vanished before the new quantum mechanics of Heisenberg. Because of its abstruse and difficultly interpretable mathematical foundation, Heisenberg s quantum mechanics cannot be easily applied to the relatively complicated problems of the structures and properties of many-electron atoms and of molecules in particular is this true for chemical problems, which usually do not permit simple dynamical formulation in terms of nuclei and electrons, but instead require to be treated with the aid of atomic and molecular models. Accordingly, it is especially gratifying that Schrodinger s interpretation of his wave mechanics3 provides a simple and satisfactory atomic model, more closely related to the chemist s atom than to that of the old quantum theory. 

That light has a dual nature and behaves either like a wave or like a stream of particle-like photons is a fact we must accept, although it is nonintuitive. But remember, we have no direct experience of the behavior of very small particles such as electrons. Which model we use depends on the observations we are making. The wave model is appropriate when we are considering diffraction and interference experiments, but the particle (photon) model is essential when we are considering the interaction of light with individual atoms or molecules. 

The electronic wave function of an n-electron molecule is defined in 3n-dimensional configuration space, consistent with any conceivable molecular geometry. If the only aim is to characterize a molecule of fixed Born-Oppenheimer geometry the amount of information contained in the molecular wave function is therefore quite excessive. It turns out that the three-dimensional electron density function contains adequate information to uniquely determine the ground-state electronic properties of the molecule, as first demonstrated by Hohenberg and Kohn [104]. The approach is equivalent to the Thomas-Fermi model of an atom applied to molecules. 

In the early development of the atomic model scientists initially thought that, they could define the sub-atomic particles by the laws of classical physics—that is, they were tiny bits of matter. However, they later discovered that this particle view of the atom could not explain many of the observations that scientists were making. About this time, a model (the quantum mechanical model) that attributed the properties of both matter and waves to particles began to gain favor. This model described the behavior of electrons in terms of waves (electromagnetic radiation). 

Our model of positive atomic cores arranged in a periodic array with valence electrons is shown schematically in Fig. 14.1. The objective is to solve the Schrodinger equation to obtain the electronic wave function ( ) and the electronic energy band structure En( k ) where n labels the energy band and k the crystal wave vector which labels the electronic state. To explore the bonding properties discussed above, a calculation of the electronic charge density... 

To date, the only applications of these methods to the solution/metal interface have been reported by Price and Halley, who presented a simplified treatment of the water/metal interface. Briefly, their model involves the calculation of the metal s valence electrons wave function, assuming that the water molecules electronic density and the metal core electrons are fixed. The calculation is based on a one-electron effective potential, which is determined from the electronic density in the metal and the atomic distribution of the liquid. After solving the Schrddinger equation for the wave function and the electronic density for one configuration of the liquid atoms, the force on each atom is ciculated and the new positions are determined using standard molecular dynamics techniques. For more details about the specific implementation of these general ideas, the reader is referred to the original article. ... 

In this section, you saw how the ideas of quantum mechanics led to a new, revolutionary atomic model—the quantum mechanical model of the atom. According to this model, electrons have both matter-like and wave-like properties. Their position and momentum cannot both be determined with certainty, so they must be described in terms of probabilities. An orbital represents a mathematical description of the volume of space in which an electron has a high probability of being found. You learned the first three quantum numbers that describe the size, energy, shape, and orientation of an orbital. In the next section, you will use quantum numbers to describe the total number of electrons in an atom and the energy levels in which they are most likely to be found in their ground state. You will also discover how the ideas of quantum mechanics explain the structure and organization of the periodic table. 

The original 5-wave-tip model described the tip as a macroscopic spherical potential well, for example, with r 9 A. It describes the protruded end of a free-electron-metal tip. Another incarnation of the 5-wave-tip model is the Na-atom-tip model. It assumes that the tip is an alkali metal atom, for example, a Na atom, weakly adsorbed on a metal surface (Lang, 1986 see Section 6.3). Similar to the original 5-wave model, the Na-atom-tip model predicts a very low intrinsic lateral resolution. 

The TMCs electronic wave function formalizing the CFT ionic model is one with a fixed number of electrons in the d-shell. In the EHCF method it is used as a zero approximation. The interactions responsible for electron transfers between the d-shell and the ligands are treated as perturbations. Following the standards semiempirical setting we restrict the AO basis for all atoms of the TMC by the valence orbitals. All the AOs of the TMC are... 

---