Arrhenius equation Transition-state theory expression

If a data set containing k T) pairs is fitted to this equation, the values of these two parameters are obtained. They are A, the pre-exponential factor (less desirably called the frequency factor), and Ea, the Arrhenius activation energy or sometimes simply the activation energy. Both A and Ea are usually assumed to be temperature-independent in most instances, this approximation proves to be a very good one, at least over a modest temperature range. The second equation used to express the temperature dependence of a rate constant results from transition state theory (TST). Its form is... 

Expression (109) appears to be similar to the Arrhenius expression, but there is an important difference. In the Arrhenius equation the temperature dependence is in the exponential only, whereas in collision theory we find a dependence in the pre-exponential factor. We shall see later that transition state theory predicts even stronger dependences on T. 

Transition state theory yields rate coefficients at the high-pressure limit (i.e., statistical equilibrium). For reactions that are pressure-dependent, more sophisticated methods such as RRKM rate calculations coupled with master equation calculations (to estimate collisional energy transfer) allow for estimation of low-pressure rates. Rate coefficients obtained over a range of temperatures can be used to obtain two- and three-parameter Arrhenius expressions ... 

Temperature Effect Determination of Activation Energy. From the transition state theory of chemical reactions, an expression for the variation of the rate constant, k, with temperature known as the Arrhenius equation can be written... 

We see in Table XII. 1 that we cannot separately identify the terms in the rate-constant expression for the thermodynamics equation or the collision theories without special assumptions. A complete identification of all the terms, frequencies, energies of activation and entropies of activation from experimental data is possible only for the Arrhenius equation and the transition-state theory. 

The rate constant (/ ,) was expressed in terms of the results of the computer simulations, for which a non-adiabatic transition-state theory (TST) model was used. Since the experimental results were analyzed in terms of a phenomenological Arrhenius model [158], we relate experiment (left-hand side) and theory (right-hand side) in terms of the following two equations. For the weakly temperature-dependent prefactor we have ... 

Other expressions similar to the Arrhenius equation exist. One such expression is the temperature dependence derived from transition-state theory, which takes a form similar to Equation (3-2) ... 

The sorption selectivity has little influence on the separation when molecular sieving is considered. An Arrhenius type of equation is still valid for the activated transport, but attention should be drawn to the pre-exponential term, Dq (see Equation 4.7). From transition state theory this factor may be expressed as shown in Equation 4.15 [32] ... 

Because the value of RT is less than 1 kcal/mol up to about 500 K, this last expression reduces to E = Aff. We now have a tie-in between the empirical Arrhenius equation and transition-state theory and a way to evaluate the enthalpy of activation of a reaction. 

To generate an expression for the effect of pressure upon equilibria and extend it to reaction rates, this early work consisted of drawing an analogy with the effect of temperature on reaction rates embodied in the Arrhenius equation of the late 19th century.2 In the more coherent understanding since the development of transition state theory (TST),3 6 the difference between the partial molar volumes of the transition state and the reactant state is defined as the volume of activation, A V, for the forward reaction. A corresponding term A Vf applies for the reverse reaction. Throughout this contribution A V will be used and is assumed to refer to the forward reaction unless an equilibrium is under discussion. Thus ... 

The effect of temperature on enzyme reactivity (expressed by the rate constant kcat or the parameter V) can be analyzed from the theory of the activated complex (or transition state theory, TST) or else by using the semi-empirical correlation of Arrhenius. According to TST (Rooney 1995), the equation of Eyring describes the effect of temperature on any rate constant ... 

This equation is called the Arrhenius expression and is the fundamental equation representing the temperature dependence of reaction rate constants. Comparing the Arrhenius expression Eq. (2.39), with rate constant Eq. (2.33) by the collision theory and (2.38) by the transition state theory, the temperature dependence of the exponential factor is exactly the same as derived by these theories, and Ea of the Arrhenius expression corresponds to the activation energy Ea of the transition state theory. A plot of the logarithm of a reaction rate constant, In k against MRT, is called an Arrhenius plot, and the experimental value of activation energy can be obtained from the slope of the Arrhenius plot. This linear relationship is known to hold experimentally for numerous reactions, and the activation energy for each reaction has been obtained. 

Meanwhile, the pre-exponential factor A in the Arrhenius Eq. (2.39) is the temperature independent factor related to reaction frequency. Comparing the Eq. (2.33) for the collision theory and Eq. (2.38) with the transition state theory, the pre-exponential factors in these theories contain temperature dependences of T and T respectively. Experimentally, for most of reactions for which the activation energy is not close to zero, the temperature dependence of the reaction rate constants are known to be determined almost solely by exponential factor, and the Arrhenius expression holds as a good approximation. Only for the reaction with near-zero activation energy, the temperature dependence of the pre-exponential factor appears explicitly, and the deviation from the Arrhenius expression can be validated. In this case, an approximated equation modifying the Arrhenius expression can be used. 

Arrhenius rate expression and concept of an activation energy provided an important basis for the analysis of the rate of chemical reactions. However, the main difficulty that remained was the absence of a general theory to predict the parameters in the rate expression. Whereas equilibria of reactions could be rigorously defined, the determination of reaction rates remained a branch of science, for which the basic principles still had to be formulated. This was achieved in the 1930s, when Henry Eyring, and independently, Michael Polanyi and M. G. Evans, formulated (and later refined) the transition-state theory. An important aim of this book is to present the current understanding of the Arrhenius equation and its parameters in the context of catalytic reactions. 

Figure 1.3 illustrates the concept on which this book is based. It shows the relation between macroscopic kinetics, as used by the chemical engineer, and microscopic atomic information, as needed or provided by the chemist. The connection is provided by the rate equation (1.1). Rates of catalytic reactions can be predicted from the reactivity of intermediates absorbed on the surface of the catalyst, using transition-state theory to calculate the parameters in the Arrhenius expression for the reaction-rate constant. This is the philosophy behind this book. 

The idea that an activated complex or transition state controls the progress of a chemical reaction between the reactant state and the product state goes back to the study of the inversion of sucrose by S. Arrhenius, who found that the temperature dependence of the rate of reaction could be expressed as k = A exp (—AE /RT), a form now referred to as the Arrhenius equation. In the Arrhenius equation k is the forward rate constant, AE is an energy parameter, and A is a constant specific to the particular reaction under study. Arrhenius postulated thermal equilibrium between inert and active molecules and reasoned that only active molecules (i.e. those of energy Eo + AE ) could react. For the full development of the theory which is only sketched here, the reader is referred to the classic work by Glasstone, Laidler and Eyring cited at the end of this chapter. It was Eyring who carried out many of the... 

Intermolecular electron transfer seems normally to require virtually direct contact between the donor and acceptor molecules. According to a widely accepted theory, the rate constant for transfer decreases exponentially with the separation of the donor and acceptor species. In fluids, the internu-clear separation fluctuates with time, so that transfer is dominated by the short-distance events. Under such circumstances, the transfer process can be regarded as a normal bimolecular reaction, for which in a transition-state formulation the rate coefficient, kt, is characterized by a free energy of activation, A G, equated somewhat arbitrarily with the activation energy, a, of the conventional Arrhenius expression ... 

An alternative approach to polaron transport in organic solids is in terms of electron transfer (ET). The process can be viewed as a special case of the non-radiative decay of an electronic state. The derivation of the theory is developed in various books or review papers [13-15]. The parameter of importance here is the transition probability per unit time (or transition rate) kif between an initial and a final state. The rate is estimated within the Franck-Condon approximation. In the high-temperature regime ( cOif < kT) the Franck-Condon-weighted density (FCWD) reduces to a standard Arrhenius equation, so the rate takes its semiclassical Marcus theory expression [16] ... 

---