ARIMA order

The ARIMA analysis evaluates the autocorrelation functions to determine the order of the appropriate moving average and the need for differencing. An appropriate model is chosen and the fit to the data is constructed followed by a careful analysis of the residuals. The parameters are adjusted and the fit is checked again. The process is applied iteratively until the errors are minimized or the model fails to converge. 

The values of the three electrochemical measurements, potential, resistance, and current were measured for the four coatings over time. The resultant time series for each measurement and coating combination were analyzed by the Box-Jenkins ARIMA procedure. Application of the ARIMA model will be demonstrated for the poly(urethane) coating. Similar prediction results were obtained for all coatings and measurements, however, not all systems were modeled by the same order of ARIMA process. 

In order to calculate the fitted values of the drinking water in the storage reservoir by ARIMA modeling, the data set was shortened for the explanatory variable, the feeder stream. All following time series analytical procedures only use the values from the nitrate concentration series in the drinking water reservoir. 

The specification of ARIMA models is very expensive for the operator who analyzes time series. The first phase is the estimation of the order of three inherent processes, autoregression, integration, and moving average. 

This differencing is continued until the time series is stationary (mean and variance are not dependent on time). Frequently, single time differencing, i.e. first order for the seasonal ARIMA model, is sufficient. Second order differencing is necessary for quadratic trends. Please note the loss of values after differencing (e.g. after first-order seasonal differencing twelve values will be lost). 

First, the series of the nitrate concentrations within the storage reservoir is made stationary in order to obtain the parameters d and sd for the trend and the seasonal ARIMA model. With one-time differencing at the differences 1, the series becomes stationary and the parameter d is set to unity (Fig. 6-24), but seasonal fluctuations are present. With one-time differencing of the original nitrate series at the difference 12, the seasonal fluctuations disappear, but the trend is present (Fig. 6-25). It is, therefore, necessary to include the seasonal ARIMA component in the model, the parameter sd is set to zero. The deduced possible model is ARIMA ( ,1, )( ,0, ). 

The PACF illustrates the order 1 for the AR component, but at this stage of estimation of the model it is unknown if the trend or the seasonal model follow the autoregression with the order of one. No moving average component can be found from the PACF. Deduced possible models are ARIMA (1,1,0)( 1,0,0), ARIMA (0,1,0)( 1,0,0), or ARIMA (1,1,0)(0,0,0). 

In ARIMA modeling, the order of the autoregressive component is frequently zero, one or sometimes two. Therefore, only short forecasting intervals are of any use. Disturbances in future values, normally smoothed by the moving average, were set to zero. The following example demonstrates this fact ... 

Comparing this with equation (3) shows that this can be considered as the output of a first order transfer function in response to a random input sequence. More generally, most stochastic disturbances can be modelled by a general autoregressive-integrated moving-average (ARIMA) time series model of order (p,d,q), that is,... 

Figure 17 depicts, by way of example, the results obtained for the serie BJ06. It is compared with Fig. 16. It is possible to see how the use of ARIMA models significantly reduces, above 35 %, the variability of orders along the supply chain. Table 9 shows, in each case, the optimal policy for each level of the supply chain.

ABSTRACT This paper is to research an application of the multiplicative seasonal model to forecast the total number of China s coal mine accidents. By the empirical analysis on the data of coal mine accidents from January 2006 to December 2010, an accepted multiplicative seasonal forecasting model ARIMA(4,1,1)(1,1,1) is built up after differing the series to be stationary and estimating the order and parameters of the model. Furthermore, the test of this multiplicative seasonal model shows that it has a desirable fitting effect on the data of coal mine accidents. At last, this model is applied to forecast the number of national coal mine accidents from January 2010 to December 2010, and the forecasted values have a high accuracy when compared to the actual data. 

Also, a time series changing seasonally couldn t be modeled by ARMA immediately. Firstly, it should be differed to remove the seasonality of the series, and the length of one difference step is one seasonal cycle. Generally, if the series is processed by a D-th order difference the cycle length of which is s, the seasonality will almost be removed. Furthermore, if the series needs to be turned stationary by a d-th order difference before it s impacted by the seasonal difference, a model called the Multiplicative Seasonal Mod-el ARIMA(p, d, q) (P, D, Q) could analyze the original series, and the model is described as below ... 

ARIMA model is used to correct GM (1,1) model in order to improve accuracy. In the meantime of verifying the prediction with historical data, we also obtain an error sequence between true values and prediction, and regard it as a random sequence to establish its prediction model, and then correct the GM (1, 1) model with it. The process of establishing ARIMA model is test the smoothness of residual error, if it is smooth, then establish ARIMA model if not, smooth it after several times of difference operation and then establish ARIMA model. 

Murakami, Y, Kawada, H., Kawata, H., Tanaka, M., Arima, T., Moritomo, H., and Tokura, Y. Direct observation of charge and orbital ordering in Lao Srj sMn04. Phys. Rev. Lett 1998, 80, 1932-1935. 

---