Aqueous electrolyte theory

IHP) (the Helmholtz condenser formula is used in connection with it), located at the surface of the layer of Stem adsorbed ions, and an outer Helmholtz plane (OHP), located on the plane of centers of the next layer of ions marking the beginning of the diffuse layer. These planes, marked IHP and OHP in Fig. V-3 are merely planes of average electrical property the actual local potentials, if they could be measured, must vary wildly between locations where there is an adsorbed ion and places where only water resides on the surface. For liquid surfaces, discussed in Section V-7C, the interface will not be smooth due to thermal waves (Section IV-3). Sweeney and co-workers applied gradient theory (see Chapter III) to model the electric double layer and interfacial tension of a hydrocarbon-aqueous electrolyte interface [27]. 

SFA has been traditionally used to measure the forces between modified mica surfaces. Before the JKR theory was developed, Israelachvili and Tabor [57] measured the force versus distance (F vs. d) profile and pull-off force (Pf) between steric acid monolayers assembled on mica surfaces. The authors calculated the surface energy of these monolayers from the Hamaker constant determined from the F versus d data. In a later paper on the measurement of forces between surfaces immersed in a variety of electrolytic solutions, Israelachvili [93] reported that the interfacial energies in aqueous electrolytes varies over a wide range (0.01-10 mJ/m-). In this work Israelachvili found that the adhesion energies depended on pH, type of cation, and the crystallographic orientation of mica. 

The popular and well-studied primitive model is a degenerate case of the SPM with = 0, shown schematically in Figure (c). The restricted primitive model (RPM) refers to the case when the ions are of equal diameter. This model can realistically represent the packing of a molten salt in which no solvent is present. For an aqueous electrolyte, the primitive model does not treat the solvent molecules exphcitly and the number density of the electrolyte is umealistically low. For modeling nano-surface interactions, short-range interactions are important and the primitive model is expected not to give adequate account of confinement effects. For its simphcity, however, many theories [18-22] and simulation studies [23-25] have been made based on the primitive model for the bulk electrolyte. Ap-phcations to electrolyte interfaces have also been widely reported [26-30]. 

Aqueous electrolyte solutions have been a subject of determined studies for over a century. Numerous attempts were made to construct theories that could link the general properties of solutions to their internal structure and predict properties as yet nnknown. Modem theories of electrolyte solutions are most intimately related to many branches of physics and chemistry. The electrochemistry of electrolyte solutions is a large branch of electrochemistry sometimes regarded as an independent science. 

The current state of knowledge of aqueous solutions is the result of all that has been learned in the past. These studies have formed a major part of modern science since its beginning. Theories of aqueous electrolytes have played a major role in the history of chemistry. 

The theory proposed by Debye and Huckel dominated the study of aqueous electrolytes from around 1920 to near the end of the 1950 s. The Debye-Huckel theory was based on a model of electrolyte solutions in which the ions were treated as point charges (later as charged spheres), and the solvent was considered to be a homogeneous dielectric. Deviations from ideal behaviors were assumed to be due only to the long range electrostatic forces between ions. Refinements to include ion-ion pairing and ion... 

Galculate the diffuse-layer charge according to the classical Gouy theory for a mercury electrode in contact with an aqueous electrolyte of 0.001 M NaF, the zeta potential being +8 mV and the temperature 28 K. The dielectric constant can be taken as that of water at this temperature. (Bockris)... 

It is apparent from this plot that the Debye-Hiickel theory is only correct in a narrow range of extreme dilution, showing (as might have been anticipated) that classical electrostatics is qualitatively inadequate to describe the realistic interactions in aqueous electrolyte solutions, except in the asymptotic limit of extremely large ion-ion separations. 

In an aqueous electrolyte we have spherical silicon oxide particles. The dispersion is assumed to be monodisperse with a particle radius of 1 /rm. Please estimate the concentration of monovalent salt at which aggregation sets in. Use the DLVO theory and assume that aggregation starts, when the energy barrier decreases below 0ksT. The surface potential is assumed to be independent of the salt concentration at -20 mV. Use a Hamaker constant of 0.4 x 10-20 J. 

Using these methods to describe an aqueous electrolyte system with its associated chemical equilibria involves a unique set of highly nonlinear algebraic equations for each set of interest, even if not incorporated within the framework of a complex fractionation program. To overcome this difficulty, Zemaitis and Rafal (8) developed an automatic system, ECES, for finding accurate solutions to the equilibria of electrolyte systems which combines a unified and thermodynamically consistent treatment of electrolyte solution data and theory with computer software capable of automatic program generation from simple user input. 

In I/E curves the onset of photocurrent is expected from classical theories to occur near the Hatband potential as measured in the dark (Efb (d)), i.e. where the majority carrier current starts too. However, a large shift of the onset potential is seen especially if no additional redox couple is present in the aqueous electrolyte, in cathodic direction for p-, in anodic direction for n-type materials (Fig. 1). This shift depends on the light intensity but saturates already at relatively low intensities (Memming, 1987). If minority carrier acceptors (oxidants for p- and reductants for n-type semiconductors) are added to the solution, the onset can be shifted back to Efb (d) if they have the appropiate redox potential. In principal two types of redox couples can be found those which lead to a shift of the photocurrent onset potential and those which don t. The transition between the two classes occurs at a specific redox potential. 

Finally we shall argue that present-day theories of the nonprimitive models of the electric double layer have considerable difficulty in treating properly ion adsorption in the Stern inner region at metal-aqueous electrolyte interfaces and we suggest that this region is a useful concept which should not be dismissed as unphysical. Indeed Stern-like inner region models continue to be used in colloid and electrochemical science, for example in theories of electrokinetics and aqueous-non-metallic (e.g., oxide) interfaces. 

A second example is provided by a semiempirical correlation for multi-component activity coefficients in aqueous electrolyte solutions shown in Fig. 2. This correlation, developed by Fritz Meissner at MIT [3], presents a method for scale-up activity-coefficient data for single-salt solutions, which are plentiful, are used to predict activity coefficients for multisalt solutions for which experimental data are rare. The scale-up is guided by an extended Debye-Hilckel theory, but essentially it is based on enlightened empiricism. Meissner s method provides useful estimates of thermodynamic properties needed for process design of multieffect evaporators to produce salts from multicomponent brines. It will be many years before sophisticated statistical mechanical techniques can perform a similar scale-up calculation. Until then, correlations such as Meissner s will be required in a conventional industry that produces vast amounts of inexpensive commodity chemicals. 

The theory of the mercury-drop electrode and the potential for zero charge (pzc) is affected by the existence of a film of quasi-ice at the mercury/aqueous electrolyte interface. More than mere surface tension is involved, but little can be made numerate in the absence of properties for the film. 

---