Application method dispensers

The method used to apply the adhesive or sealant can have as much to do with the success of the joining operation as the kind of material applied. The selection of an application or dispensing method depends primarily on the form of the adhesive liquid, paste, powder,... 

In this chapter, we focus on slurry application. In by far the most common slurry application method, referred to here as point application (PA), the slurry is dispensed in a continuous or possibly pulsating stream onto the pad from a tube at the end of a slurry arm. This is generally done at a fixed location near the platen center. PA slurry flow rates vary but are usually on the order of 120—250 mL/min, depending on the wafer and platen size. 

Metering/Dispensing/Application methods is a big and important chapter of this Volume 2, where we have reviewed all the methods of dispensing/application for every type of adhesive and sealant, in all industries,... 

Standard adhesive application methods are insufficient when small amounts of adhesive are necessary. Dispenser units, working with air or extruder feed, are often used for the application of the adhesives. Here, the handling of the COTiductive adhesive is often limited because of the particle size. Another technology utilizes shaped adhesive films. This is an attractive way to produce a complex series. Non-shaped films can be used for non-conductive bonding through the use of pressure and heat. 

Special dispensing equipment must be used to apply hot-melt adhesives. Typical application methods include the use of rollers, screw extruders, and squirting pumps or nozzle applicators. 

Various adhesive application methods are available (dispensing, pin transfer and screen/stencil printing) and different adhesive rheologies are required in each case. 

Several methods have been used for the matrix application (1) immersing a tissue section quickly in a matrix solution, (2) spraying matrix solution onto a tissue section with an air brush, (3) putting small droplets of matrix solution onto a tissue section with an automatic pipetting device that can dispense picoliter volumes (lpL = 10 pk) of reagents.4,5,715161819... 

If mapping of the defects is dispensable and only the average contamination level is of interest, measurements of the reverse dark current are sufficient to provide this information [Wi2]. This method is also applicable to n-type samples, which is in contrast to decoration of SCR defects by hydrogen bubbles, which is not possible in the anodic regime. 

Next let us consider those difficulties associated with the determination of the amount of material deposited on the surface. We have already noted that the method of depositing insoluble monolayers by spreading permits the accurate determination of n. Since the spreading technique requires solvent volatility, care must be exercised to prevent the stock solutions from changing concentration due to evaporation prior to their application to the surface. Also, precise microvolumetric methods must be used to dispense the solution on the aqueous surface since the quantity used is small. The solvent (as well as the solute) must be free from contaminants. There is also the possibility that the solvent will extract spreadable contaminants from the waxed surfaces of the float, barriers, and tray. Some workers advocate addition and evaporation of one drop at a time to minimize this. Oily contaminants may also reach the water surface from the fingers and from the atmosphere. These last sources are particularly hard to control Tests for reproducibility and blank compressions (i.e., moving the barrier toward the float on a clean surface) are the best evidence of their absence. 

Hexadecyl and octadecyl alcohol have been extensively studied and shown to be highly effective in evaporation retardation. Scattering powdered samples of commercial-grade alcohols by boat on lake surfaces or the continuous addition of alcohol slurries from floating dispensers are two of the methods that have been employed to apply these monolayers. Wind conditions and the activity of aquatic birds have a considerable effect on the stability of the monolayer and therefore on the rate at which the monolayer chemicals must be reapplied. Rates of application rarely exceed 0.5 lb acre- day-1, however, so that the cost of the materials used is not excessive. 

Brushes, simple rollers, syringes, squeeze bottles, and pressurized glue guns are manual methods that provide simplicity, low cost, and versatility. These methods are probably the most widely used because of their simplicity. Manual dispensing methods allow application of adhesive to only a small segment of a surface and are particularly effective for small or irregular parts or low-volume production. 

A variety of standard and specialized applicators exist for pressure-sensitive labeling. Standard portable head applicators provide top, side, and bottom labeling. These applicators use one of several basic methods available for application of automatic pressure-sensitive labels. In a tamp-blow method of application, the label is dispensed from the backing web and held in position by vacuum on a tamp pad. The tamp pad is indexed 0.8-1.5 cm away from the product, and then the label is applied to the product by a gentle blast of air. Tamp-blow applications are used for a large array of packages that have irregular, curved, or recessed surfaces. 

---