Rubber antiozonants

Jackson, A. T., Jennings, K. R., and Scrivens, J. H., Analysis of a fivepolymer additives by means of high energy mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 10,1449, 1996. Lattimer, R. P., Layer, R. W., and Rhee, C. K., Mechanisms of antiozonant protection Antiozonant-rubber reactions during ozone exposure. Rubber Chem. Technol, 57, 1023, 1984. 

Lattimer, R.P., et al., Mechanisms of Antiozonant Protection Antiozonant — Rubber Reactions During Ozone Exposure, The B.F. Goodrich Research and Development Center, presented at the Rubber Division, A.C.S. Meeting in Indianapolis, May 8-11, 1984. 

Rubber Chemicals. Sodium nitrite is an important raw material in the manufacture of mbber processing chemicals. Accelerators, retarders, antioxidants (qv), and antiozonants (qv) are the types of compounds made using sodium nitrite. Accelerators, eg, thiuram [137-26-8J, greatly increase the rate of vulcaniza tion and lead to marked improvement in mbber quaUty. Retarders, on the other hand (eg, /V-nitrosodiphenylamine [156-10-5]) delay the onset of vulcanization but do not inhibit the subsequent process rate. Antioxidants and antiozonants, sometimes referred to as antidegradants, serve to slow the rate of oxidation by acting as chain stoppers, transfer agents, and peroxide decomposers. A commonly used antioxidant is A/,AT-disubstituted Nphenylenediamine which can employ sodium nitrite in its manufacture (see Rubber chemicals). 

Since the mid-1950s several materials have been found effective in combating ozone-initiated degradation, in particular certain p-phenylenediamine derivatives. The actual choice of such antiozonants depends on the type of polymer and on whether or not the polymer is to be subject to dynamic stressing in service. Since antiozonants are not known to have any use in plastics materials, even those which may have certain rubber particles for toughening, they will not be dealt with further here. Anyone interested further should consult references 3-5. 

The effect of ozone is complicated in so far as its effect is largely at or near the surface and is of greatest consequence in lightly stressed rubbers. Cracks are formed with an axis perpendicular to the applied stress and the number of cracks increases with the extent of stress. The greatest effect occurs when there are only a few cracks which grow in size without the interference of neighbouring cracks and this may lead to catastrophic failure. Under static conditions of service the use of hydrocarbon waxes which bloom to the surface because of their crystalline nature give some protection but where dynamic conditions are encountered the saturated hydrocarbon waxes are usually used in conjunction with an antiozonant. To date the most effective of these are secondary alkyl-aryl-p-phenylenediamines such as /V-isopropyl-jV-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (IPPD). 

To be effective, the antiozonants should have two important functions decrease the rate of crack growth in the rubber, and increase the critical stress value (i.e. the stress at which crack growth occurs). Therefore, the following properties of an antiozonant are desirable. 

A physical antiozonant provides an effective barrier against the penetration of ozone on the rubber surface. This barrier should be continuous at the surface, unreactive and impenetrable to ozone, and also capable of renewing itself if damaged. 

An antiozonant should have adequate solubility and diffusivity characteristics. Since ozone attack is a surface phenomenon, the antiozonant must migrate to the surface of the rubber to provide protection. Poor solubility in rubber may result in excessive bloom. 

An antiozonant should have no adverse effects on the rubber processing. 

Antiozonants should persist in the rubber over its entire life cycle. 

Rubber is protected against ozone attack by addition of physical and/or chemical antiozonants. Hydrocarbon waxes are the most common type of physical antiozonants, and p-phenylenediamine derivatives are the prevalent chemical antiozonants. Waxes bloom to the rubber surface and form a protective barrier. 

Since this bloom is brittle, it is broken by flexing. Therefore, waxes only protect under static conditions. For serving conditions which involve continuous flexing, /j-phenylenediamines (A, A -alkyl-aryl derivatives) can be added. These chemical antiozonants scavenge the ozone before it reacts with the rubber. A barrier of ozonized products is created which protects both the rubber and antiozonant from further attack. However, p-phenylenediamines are staining compounds. Whenever colour is an important concern, blends of elastomers can be used elastomers loading should be higher than 30 phr to provide sufficient effectiveness. 

A common loading for antiozonants in rubber formulations is 1.5-3 phr. Combinations of waxes and chemical antiozonants are used when the service conditions involve both long periods of static as well as dynamic stresses. 

Anorin-38 has also shown an interesting effect as a multifunctional additive (a single additive to replace many of the conventional additives) for natural rubber (NR). It showed excellent blending behavior and compatibility with NR. Aorin-38 enhances the tensile properties and percent elongation, decreases fatigue, acts as an antioxidant and antiozonant, and positively affects many of the other properties, apart from acting as a process aid and a cure enhancer [183-186]. 

Rubbers can be protected against ozone by use of chemical antiozonants and via several physical methods. The chemical antiozonants protect rubber under both static and dynamic conditions, whereas the physical methods are more related towards protection under static conditions. 

Chemical antiozonants have been developed to protect rubber against ozone under such dynamic conditions. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how chemical antiozonants protect rubber. The scavenging mechanism, the protective film mechanism, or a combination of both are nowadays the most accepted mechanisms. 

The scavenging mechanism states that antiozonants function by migrating towards the surface of the rubber and, due to their exceptional reactivity towards ozone, scavenge the ozone before it can react with the rubber [60]. The scavenging mechanism is based on the fact that all antiozonants react much more rapidly with ozone than do the double bonds of the rubber molecules. This fact distinguishes antiozonants from antioxidants. 

This mechanism is based on the fact that the ozone uptake of elongated rubber containing a substituted p-phenylene diamine type of antiozonant is very fast initially and then decreases rather rapidly with time and eventually stops almost completely. The film has been studied spectroscopically and shown to consist of unreacted antiozonant and its ozonized products, but no ozonized rubber is involved [64], Since these ozonized products are polar, they have poor solubility in the rubber and accumulate on the surface. 

The most effective antiozonants are the substituted PPDs. Their mechanism of protection against ozone is based on the scavenger-protective film mechanism [68-70]. The reaction of ozone with the antiozonant is much faster than the reaction with the C=C bond of the rubber on the rubber surface [56]. The rubber is protected from the ozone attack tUl the surface antiozonant is depleted. As the antiozonant is continuously consumed through its reaction with ozone at the mbber surface, diffusion of the antiozonant from the inner parts to the surface replenishes the surface concentration to provide the continuous protection against ozone. A thin flexible film developed from the antiozonant/ozone reaction products on the mbber surface also offers protection. 

Solvent wiping. Rubbers tend to swell by application of solvents and the mechanical interlocking of the adhesive is favored. Although chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents are the most effective, they are toxic and cannot be used toluene and ketones are currently the most common solvents. The treatment with solvents is effective in the removal of processing oils and plasticizers in vulcanized mbbers, but zinc stearate is not completely removed and antiozonant wax gradually migrates to the mbber/polyurethane adhesive interface. Table 27.1 shows the moderate increase in adhesion produced in SBR by MEK wiping. 

Plastic and rubber additives are both commodity chemicals and specialties. The Handbook of Plastic and Rubber Additives [27] mentions over 13 000 products antioxidants and antiozonants amount to more than 1500 trade name products and chemicals [28], flame retardants to some 1000 chemicals [29] and antimicrobials to over 1200 products [30]. 

Plasticiser/oil in rubber is usually determined by solvent extraction (ISO 1407) and FTIR identification [57] TGA can usually provide good quantifications of plasticiser contents. Antidegradants in rubber compounds may be determined by HS-GC-MS for volatile species (e.g. BHT, IPPD), but usually solvent extraction is required, followed by GC-MS, HPLC, UV or DP-MS analysis. Since cross-linked rubbers are insoluble, more complex extraction procedures must be carried out. The determination of antioxidants in rubbers by means of HPLC and TLC has been reviewed [58], The TLC technique for antidegradants in rubbers is described in ASTM D 3156 and ISO 4645.2 (1984). Direct probe EIMS was also used to analyse antioxidants (hindered phenols and aromatic amines) in rubber extracts [59]. ISO 11089 (1997) deals with the determination of /V-phenyl-/9-naphthylamine and poly-2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline (TMDQ) as well as other generic types of antiozonants such as IV-alkyl-AL-phenyl-p-phenylenediamines (e.g. IPPD and 6PPD) and A-aryl-AL-aryl-p-phenylenediamines (e.g. DPPD), by means of HPLC. 

At Goodyear laser-desorption MS has been used for direct analysis of rubber additives (e.g. antioxidants, antiozonants, vulcanising agents, processing oils, silica fillers, etc.), in situ at the surface of an elastomeric vulcanisate [74,75]. 

---