Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Anodic deposit formation

Markov chains theory provides a powerful tool for modeling several important processes in electrochemistry and electrochemical engineering, including electrode kinetics, anodic deposit formation and deposit dissolution processes, electrolyzer and electrochemical reactors performance and even reliability of warning devices and repair of failed cells. The way this can be done using the elegant Markov chains theory is described in lucid manner by Professor Thomas Fahidy in a concise chapter which gives to the reader only the absolutely necessary mathematics and is rich in practical examples. [Pg.8]

Markovian Interpretation of an Anodic Deposit Formation <-> Deposit Dissolution Process... [Pg.293]

Markov Chain Evolution for the Anodic Deposit Formation<->Deposit Dissolution Process. The Initial State is Purely Ionic (/> ° = 1 p2 = 0)... [Pg.294]

Only three values of log Kso are available for lepidocrocite and these are not in very good agreement. Hashimoto and Misawa (1973) measured the solubility of lepidocrocite produced by anodic deposition from Fe" solution on a platinum electrode and obtained a value for log Kso of 2.50. This agrees with the value calculated from the free energy of formation (Blesa et al., 1994). Mohr et al. (1972) quote a value of 2.72 and Lindsay (1979) gives 1.59. [Pg.217]

The formation or dissolution of a new phase during an electrode reaction such as metal deposition, anodic oxide formation, precipitation of an insoluble salt, etc. involves surface processes other than charge transfer. For example, the incorporation of a deposited metal atom (adatom [146]) into a stable surface lattice site introduces extra hindrance to the flow of electric charge at the electrode—solution interface and therefore the kinetics of these electrocrystallization processes are important in the overall electrode kinetics. For a detailed discussion of this subject, refs. 147—150 are recommended. [Pg.73]

The insoluble corrosion product Fe(OH)2 can help bacterial film to control the diffusion of oxygen to the anodic sites in the pit. This forms a typical tubercle. If chlorides are present in the aqueous solution, the pH of the solution trapped in the tubercle can become very acid due to the autocatalytic propagation mechanism of localized corrosion due to deposit formation and generation of hydrochloric acid. [Pg.389]

Nucleation and growth kinetics — Nucleation-and-growth is the principal mechanism of phase transformation in electrochemical systems, widely seen in gas evolution, metal deposition, anodic film formation reactions, and polymer film deposition, etc. It is also seen in solid-state phase transformations (e.g., battery materials). It is characterized by the complex coupling of two processes (nucleation and phase growth of the new phase, typically a crystal), and may also involve a third process (diffusion) at high rates of reaction. In the absence of diffusion, the observed electric current due to the nucleation and growth of a large number of independent crystals is [i]... [Pg.461]

The most common species determined by cathodic stripping voltammetry are anions such as halides or sulphide, at a mercury electrode. This involves formation of a film of mercury(I) salts on the electrode in the deposition step. The anodic oxidation process involved in the deposition step is in fact the oxidation of mercury metal to mercury(I) ions. These immediately precipitate insoluble mercury(I) salts with the halide ion etc, on to the surface of the electrode. The anodic deposition potential required depends on the anion concerned. The subsequent cathodic stripping peak for the mercury(I) salt of each anion has at its own individual potential. [Pg.195]

Cathodic stripping voltammetry has proved suitable for a number of organic compounds, including drugs and pesticides. These in general contain sulphur and again the deposition step involves anodic (oxidation) formation of an insoluble mercury salt. Clearly this is possible only with a mercury electrode. [Pg.195]

By utilizing reaction localization in ENT, formation of 3D structures can be achieved with the help of production of negative structures. Figure 13.2 shows various procedures for the development of nanostructures with the help of anodic deposition of metal in nanoscopic scale and subsequent dissolution of sacrificial layer [2]. [Pg.243]

The conventional type of CSV has been used to determine a variety of inorganic and organic compounds that form an insoluble film on the electrode material during the preconcentration step. The most commonly used working electrode is the HMDE. The preconcentration step involves the application of a positive (anodic) deposition potential to the working electrode, with the formation of a sparingly soluble compound with the mercury electrode. The application of the positive potential results in the oxidation of metallic mercury to mercury(I) ... [Pg.4952]

This section on film growth will be restricted to direct film formation processes in which passivation is the result of the direct reaction between the metal surface and the aqueous solution. Other processes of film formation, such as dissolution/precip-itation (dissolution of metal ions and subsequent precipitation of an oxide, oxi-hydrox-ide, or hydroxide) and anodic deposition processes (anodic oxidation of metal ions in the solution and deposition on the surface), are not treated here. [Pg.150]

Pores and active defects in nonmetallic coatings can be revealed by color indication or deposit formation. On nickel substrates, diinethylglyoxime. or steel, potassium ferricyanide (fer-roxyl lest) indicator can be applied to surface on filter paper while substrate is made the anode. Alternatively, a substrate immersed in acidic copper sulfate can be made the cathode to foim copper nodules at conductive coalings defects. [Pg.37]

Habazaki H., Shimizu K., Skeldon R, Thompson G.E. and Wood G.C. (1997c), Anodic flhn formation on a sputter-deposited Al-40at% Sm alloy , J. Mater. Res., 12, 1885-91. [Pg.159]


See other pages where Anodic deposit formation is mentioned: [Pg.1002]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.1002]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.4952]    [Pg.1254]    [Pg.2006]    [Pg.775]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.91]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.145 ]




SEARCH



Formation anodic

© 2024 chempedia.info