Analytical-boundary method, description

With the study of the migration of hydrogenium ions (H ) in a phenolphthalein gel by Lodge in 1886 and the description of the migration of ions in saline solutions by Kohlraush in 1897, a basis was set for the development of a new separation technique that we know today as electrophoresis. Indeed, several authors applied the concepts introduced by Lodge and Kohlraush in their methods and when Arne Tiselius reported the separation of different serum proteins in 1937, the approach called electrophoresis was recognized as a potential analytical technique. Tiselius received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the introduction of the method called moving boundary electrophoresis. ... 

Equation (9.15) was written for macro-pore diffusion. Recognize that the diffusion of sorbates in the zeoHte crystals has a similar or even identical form. The substitution of an appropriate diffusion model can be made at either the macropore, the micro-pore or at both scales. The analytical solutions that can be derived can become so complex that they yield Httle understanding of the underlying phenomena. In a seminal work that sought to bridge the gap between tractabUity and clarity, the work of Haynes and Sarma [10] stands out They took the approach of formulating the equations of continuity for the column, the macro-pores of the sorbent and the specific sorption sites in the sorbent. Each formulation was a pde with its appropriate initial and boundary conditions. They used the method of moments to derive the contributions of the three distinct mass transfer mechanisms to the overall mass transfer coefficient. The method of moments employs the solutions to all relevant pde s by use of a Laplace transform. While the solutions in Laplace domain are actually easy to obtain, those same solutions cannot be readily inverted to obtain a complete description of the system. The moments of the solutions in the Laplace domain can however be derived with relative ease. 

Conduction is treated from both the analytical and the numerical viewpoint, so that the reader is afforded the insight which is gained from analytical solutions as well as the important tools of numerical analysis which must often be used in practice. A similar procedure is followed in the presentation of convection heat transfer. An integral analysis of both free- and forced-convection boundary layers is used to present a physical picture of the convection process. From this physical description inferences may be drawn which naturally lead to the presentation of empirical and practical relations for calculating convection heat-transfer coefficients. Because it provides an easier instruction vehicle than other methods, the radiation-network method is used extensively in the introduction of analysis of radiation systems, while a more generalized formulation is given later. 

An orthogonal collocation method for elliptic partial differential equations is presented and used to solve the equations resulting from a two-phase two-dimensional description of a packed bed. Comparisons are made between the computational results and experimental results obtained from earlier work. Some qualitative discrimination between rival correlations for the two-phase model parameters is possible on the basis of these comparisons. The validity of the numerical method is shown by applying it to a one-phase packed-bed model for which an analytical solution is available problems arising from a discontinuity in the wall boundary condition and from the semi-infinite domain of the differential operator are discussed. 

The aim of this chapter is to present the fundamentals of adsorption at liquid interfaces and a selection of techniques, for their experimental investigation. The chapter will summarise the theoretical models that describe the dynamics of adsorption of surfactants, surfactant mixtures, polymers and polymer/surfactant mixtures. Besides analytical solutions, which are in part very complex and difficult to apply, approximate and asymptotic solutions are given and their range of application is demonstrated. For methods like the dynamic drop volume method, the maximum bubble pressure method, and harmonic or transient relaxation methods, specific initial and boundary conditions have to be considered in the theories. The chapter will end with the description of the background of several experimental technique and the discussion of data obtained with different methods. 

The aim of this chapter is to present the fundamentals of adsorption kinetics of surfactants at liquid interfaces. Theoretical models will be summarised to describe the process of adsorption of surfactants and surfactant mixtures. As analytical solutions are either scarcely available or very complex and difficult to apply, also approximate and asymptotic solutions are given and their ranges of application demonstrated. For particular experimental methods specific initial and boundary conditions have to be considered in these theories. In particular for relaxation theories the experimental conditions have to be met in order to quantitatively understand the obtained results. In respect to micellar solutions and the impact of micelles on the adsorption layer dynamics a detailed description on the theoretical basis as well as a selection of representative experiments will follow in Chapter 5. 

Another difficulty arising from this comparison is connected with the mathematical complexity of the corresponding boundary problems even if only linear diffusion equations are used. The mathematical description of the adsorption kinetics from micellar solutions is essentially more complicated in comparison with the case of the adsorption process from sub-micellar solutions. Analytical solutions of the corresponding boundary problems using rather poor approximations have been obtained only for a small number of situations. A sufficiently general solution cannot be obtained analytically and the deficiency of the rather well elaborated numerical methods often compel experimentalists to apply approximate solutions. Therefore, it seems important to consider the main equations proposed for the description of kinetic dependencies of the surface tension and adsorption, and to elucidate the limits of their application before the discussion of experimental results. 

In the present communication, a brief description of the pore plugging model is presented and its differences with that of Ramachandran and Smith (7 ) are examined. An analytical calculation of the time required to plug the pore is presented. In addition, a perturbation solution for small times is used to motivate the formulation of a semianalytical version of the collocation method for two point boundary value problems with steep concentration profiles. 

---