Embedded Algorithms

There are four parameters which must be fixed to use the MLE algorithm Embedding dimension, de, maximum scale, Sm, minimum scale, Sm and evolution time, O. Basically, de is the attractor dimension where the orbits were embedded, Sm is the estimate value of the length scale on which the local structure of the attractor is not longer being proved. Sm is the length scale in which noise is expected to appear. O is fixed for compute of divergence measurements which is the necessary time to renormalize the distances between trajectories (for more details see [50]). 

Speed in carrying out the searches is a serious issue, given the size of some of the CAMEO stacks, in spite of the efficient search algorithms embedded in HyperCard a clever human looking for "xylene" in a 2674-page encyclopedia would start at the back of the book, but HyperCard always starts from the beginning of the stack. The Citizen s Helper makes use, wherever possible, of unique identifying numbers for cards in stacks. We created index tables of chemicals by health effect these make it possible to find the health information about xylene more rapidly than even the clever human could. 

The second step concerns distance selection and metrization. Bound smoothing only reduces the possible intervals for interatomic distances from the original bounds. However, the embedding algorithm demands a specific distance for every atom pair in the molecule. These distances are chosen randomly within the interval, from either a uniform or an estimated distribution [48,49], to generate a trial distance matrix. Unifonn distance distributions seem to provide better sampling for very sparse data sets [48]. 

The simplest formulation of the packing problem is to give some collection of distance constraints and to calculate these coordinates in ordinary three-dimensional Euclidean space for the atoms of a molecule. This embedding problem - the Fundamental Problem of Distance Geometry - has been proven to be NP-hard [116]. However, this does not mean that practical algorithms for its solution do not exist [117-119]. 

These recent results for dense polybead systems are very encouraging. One must wait for tests on realistic polymers with complicated chemical structures and side groups, however, before definitive conclusions can be drawn. The scaling law for the embedding algorithm has to be explored in more detail for the most cumbersome polymer structures. 

Based on the RIS Ansatz, the embedding algorithm benefits from a great flexibility in the choice of the input parameters that account for the local chain energy configuration the input for the correlations of torsion angles along the chain backbones can be either calculated with the help of a force field, or extracted from measurements, or even biased in order to study any thinkable structural properties of the macromolecules. 

Theorem 2. Let C" be the output of the destroy algorithm on input (G,C ), where C is the output of the embedding algorithm on input graph G. Then the verification algorithm will always output yes on input (G,C",M) for arbitrary... 

Note that the unused CLBs are disconnected from other functional CLBs, and the outputs of the FPGA. Therefore using any connectivity checking algorithm, we can locate these hidden CLBs efficiently, even after they have been embedded with signature bits and randomly relocated. Below is the deletion algorithm. 

It is easy to see that our algorithm completely remove all embedded nonfunctional CLBs that were used to embed the signature. Therefore this simple scheme is easily defeated. 

After the first step, all embedded non-functional CLBs are disconnected from the outputs of the FPGA. Hence they are removed in the second step, i.e. the watermarking scheme is broken. This deletion algorithm breaks the scheme of [8] too because this scheme also uses the same embedding and hiding algorithm. 

Applying Immersed or Embedded Boundary Methods (Mittal and Iaccarino, 2005) circumvents the whole issue of the friction between the more or less steady overall flow in the bulk of the vessel and the strongly transient character of the flow in the zone of the impeller. These methods are introduced below. In the context of a LES, Derksen and Van den Akker (1999) introduced a forcing technique for both the stationary vessel wall and the revolving impeller. They imposed no-slip boundary conditions at the revolving impeller and at the stationary tank wall (including baffles). To this purpose, they developed a specific control algorithm. 

---