Air friction

Second Wind-Induced Breakup (Wave-like Breakup with Air Friction) Dynamic Pressure of Ambient Air 13[Pg.131]

Figure 3.2. Breakup regimes of round liquid jets in quiescent air. I Rayleigh Jet Breakup (Varicose Breakup) II First Wind-Induced Breakup (Sinuous Wave Breakup) III Second Wind-Induced Breakup (Wave-like Breakup with Air Friction) IV Atomization.

B) Flat Liquid Sheets into Air Streams Mechanical and Aerodynamic Disintegration. In air streams (with an air flow), a liquid sheet issuing from the 2-D nozzle will form a quasi-2-D expanding spray. The breakup modes are divided into two groups (1) mechanical mode due to the action of liquid injection pressure, and (2) aerodynamic mode due to the action of air friction. 

The relationship is described by a fundamental scientific law (a first principle), formulated as a relative simple mathematical equation with all parameters known. An example is for instance the time, y, a falling stone needs for a given height, x the gravity constant, g, is known and y can be easily calculated by (2x/g)0 5—if special effects like air friction are ignored. 

Prior to World War II the majority of experimental work in the field of sprays concerned itself with Diesel engine injection problems. Sauter (21C) has suggested that the efficiency of atomization is determined by its fineness and uniformity. De Juhasz (2C) has determined the effect of many different variables on the process of spraying. The more important physical factors tested include the pressure drop across the orifice, the viscosity of the liquid, and the density of the air. For the many different nozzles tested, the ratio of orifice length to diameter has little effect. To determine the effect of the density of the air into which the liquid was sprayed, the nozzles were allowed to discharge into an evacuated chamber. Under these conditions good results are still obtained, suggesting little influence of air friction on jet breakup. 

Jet trajectory. A free liquid jet in air will describe a trajectory, or path under the action of gravity, with a vertical velocity component which is continually changing. The trajectory is a streamline consequently, if air friction is neglected, Bernoulli s theorem may be applied to it, with all the pressure terms 0. Thus, the sum of the elevation and velocity head must be the same for all points of the curve. The energy gradient is a horizontal line at distance V2/2g above the nozzle, where V is the velocity leaving the nozzle. 

The same value may be obtained by substituting for Vx and Vx in Eq. (10.54). The foregoing calculations are for an ideal case. In reality, air friction and turbulence will alter the trajectory. 

Centrifuges where the rotors are run in a high vacuum chamber are called ultracentrifuges. Their maximum speed is not limited by air friction, and thus the rotors do not have to be aerodynamically designed because of this they can reach very high speeds. Ultracentrifuges are made for both analytical and preparative applications. 

The spinning rotor of a horizontal-head centrifuge offers considerable resistance to rotation and generates heat as a result of air friction. This resistance is lessened if the swinging buckets are enclosed in a windshield. 

In one sense, launching a rocket from the moon is easier than launching it from Earth. The moon has only about one-sixth the gravitational pull of our planet. Furthermore, since there is no air on the moon, air friction won t slow the rocket down after launch. That s why the lunar lander s engineers did not have to give their creation a sleek, aerodynamic shape, as they would have if the rocket was intended for an Earth launch. In fact, the thing looked more like a strange bug than a rocket. 

The air friction, which slows down the particles in their trajectory, and the slippage on the disk will have to be taken into account. The derivative of the velocity was given by the work of Teunou et al. and can be written as ... 

If we were able to prevent such unwanted losses, it would be easy to measure the effort necessary for our activity. We will therefore assume that by using appropriate measures, losses can be avoided. Ball bearings help against axle friction, a vacuum helps against air friction, thicker wires help against line resistance, and the friction of wheels on a surface can be compensated for by a harder surface, or better yet, air cushions. Later on we will see how we can deal with things when such compensating measures are unavailable or insufficient. 

Fig. 17 Top Schematic of DPN process bottom Sequence of LFM force images (acquired in air friction forces (a.u.) increase from dark to bright contrast) of arrays of lines with mean widths ( standard deviation) of 50 20 nm and 70 10 nm produced by DPN of G4 PAMAM dendrimers on NHS-CIO SAMs on granular gold. The contrast in the LFM scans is reversed compared to the microcontact-printed patterns, which were scanned with a clean Si3N4 tip. As also observed in an independent study [92], the remaining ink on the AFM tip used for DPN alters the relative magnitude of the friction forces in this situation. (Reprinted with permission from [77], copyright (2004), American Chemical Society)...

Where m is the mass of the projectile in kg, and are striking and residual velocities of the projectile in m/s respectively. The energy loss due to air friction could be obtained by performing the test without any samples. Energy absorbed by sample target could therefore be worked out. 

---