Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Affinity, total differential

It is natural to consider the case when the surface affinity h to adsorb or desorb ions remains unchanged when charging the wall but other cases could be considered as well. In Fig. 13 the differential capacitance C is plotted as a function of a for several values of h. The curves display a maximum for non-positive values of h and a flat minimum for positive values of h. At the pzc the value of the Gouy-Chapman theory and that for h = 0 coincide and the same symmetry argument as in the previous section for the totally symmetric local interaction can be used to rationalize this result. [Pg.840]

There can be, however, no doubt that in catalytic processes, purely physical factors play an important role, in addition to the chemical valence forces. This is particularly true for the solid catalysts of heterogeneous reactions for which the properties of surfaces, as the seats of catalytic action are of prime importance. The total surface areas, the fine structure of the surfaces, the transport of reactants to and from surfaces, and the adsorption of the reactants on the surfaces, can all be considered as processes of a predominantly physical nature which contribute to the catalytic overall effect. Any attempt, however, to draw too sharp a line between chemical and physical processes would be futile. This is illustrated clearly by the fact that the adsorption of gases on surfaces can be described either as a mere physical condensation of the gas molecules on top of the solid surface, as well as the result of chemical affinities between adsorbate and adsorbent. Every single case of adsorption may lie closer to either one of the hypothetical extremes of a purely physcial or of a purely chemical adsorption, and it would be misleading to maintain an artificial differentiation between physical and chemical factors. [Pg.100]

In 1908, the Enghsh chemist Samuel Henry Clifford Briggs (1880 1935) proposed formulas for complexes that he claimed agreed with experimental data and showed how the afiSnities of the atoms are disposed in the molecule. He did not claim to be proposing a new theory of valence. Like Werner, he thought that a totally comprehensive and satisfactory theory of valence will not be possible until we have a much more complete knowledge of the constitution of molecular compounds, and also of the nature of chemical affinity, than we possess today . He later (1917) reinterpreted his formulas in terms of the electronic theory of valence, differentiated between what he called primary and secondary affinity (similar to Werner s primary and secondary valences), and proposed three different types of chemical combinations. [Pg.891]

The initial heat of adsorption of oxygen on lithiated oxides and the total amount of adsorbed gas increase when the lithium content increases (Table XI). Moreover, the average heat of adsorption on lithium-doped samples is larger than on pure NiO(250°) since differential heats decrease more progressively with increasing coverage on doped samples (Fig. 27) than on pure NiO(250°) (Fig. 9). These results indicate that incorporation of lithium ions in vacuo enhances the surface affinity toward oxygen and confirm, therefore, the mechanism of incorporation... [Pg.231]

Concluding, it seems appropriate first to discuss the total alkali-halogen ionization cross sections, next to extend the discussion to differential cross sections and finally to discuss other collision partners. A special section will be devoted to the determination and interpretation of the molecular electron affinities. [Pg.507]

Symbols EA electron affinity thr threshold energy Q relative total cross section o relative differential cross section. Specification parameters E energy dependence m mass selection of negative ions T temperature dependence. [Pg.510]

Consider a ligand A with an affinity (defined as the equilibrium association constant Ka= ki/h ) of for receptor state R and for receptor state R, where the factor a denotes the differential affinity of the agonist for i that is, a =10 denotes a 10-fold greater affinity of the ligand for the R state. The effect of a (selective affinity) on the ability of the ligand to alter the equilibrium between R and R can be calculated by examining the amount of R (both as R and AR ) present in the system in the absence of A and in the presence of A. The equilibrium expression for [R ] + [AK ])/[RjoJ where is the total receptor... [Pg.68]

Binding of thyroid hormones to plasma proteins protects the hormones from metabolism and excretion and prolongs their half-lives in circulation. The free (unbound) hormone is a small percentage (about 0.03% of T and 0.3% of Tj) of the total hormone in plasma. The differential binding affinities for plasma proteins also are reflected in the 10-100-fold differences in circulating hormone concentrations and half-lives of T and T. ... [Pg.982]


See other pages where Affinity, total differential is mentioned: [Pg.59]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.834]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.849]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.1127]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.711]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.344]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.58 ]




SEARCH



Total differentiation

© 2024 chempedia.info