Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adsorbate perturbations

A study of the effects of the adsorbent perturbation on the B.E.T. theory has been reported by Peticolas lOJf). The frequency of an adsorbent molecule, in an adsorbent site, is expected to increase by 10% when it interacts with an adsorbed molecule. Other consequences of the perturbation of the adsorbent have been discussed by Tykodi 106, 106) and Copeland (107). [Pg.284]

We shall merely summarize results here derivations are available in the papers of Hill (18,83), Kington and Aston (87), and Everett (86). As shown by Hill (83), the equations are valid whether or not there are adsorbent perturbations, etc. [Pg.246]

We now derive Eqs. (59) and (60) from adsorption thermodynamics (83). This can be done by using the completely general approach of solution thermodynamics as a starting point, the value of which would be to emphasize that adsorption and solution thermodynamics are completely equivalent, are derivable from each other, have the same starting point, and apply to the same systems (regardless of adsorbent perturbations, swelling, etc.). However, this point of view has been stressed elsewhere (83) and we confine ourselves here, except for a few further remarks later, to the special case of an inert adsorbent, this being the case for which adsorption thermodynamics is particularly useful and natural. [Pg.248]

With an inert adsorbent it is both possible and desirable for purposes of understanding adsorption data to consider the adsorbed molecules as a one-component system (in the external field of the adsorbent). Eventually adsorbent perturbations will have to be taken care of, but this is certainly a second-order effect in almost all physical (not chemical) adsorption systems. [Cook, Pack and Oblad (2a) would except the first adsorbed layer.]... [Pg.248]

It should be recalled that we have restricted ourselves to an inert adsorbent. In so doing we have been able to handle the volume of the adsorbed film rigorously, but with a considerable loss of generality. That is, we cannot include adsorbent perturbation, swelling, the transition from adsorption to solution, etc., as is done in IX (83). [Pg.253]

In the case of Ru(2,2 -bipyridine)3 adsorbed on porous Vycor glass, it was inferred that structural perturbation occurs in the excited state, R, but not in the ground state [209]. [Pg.419]

Vibrational energy states are too well separated to contribute much to the entropy or the energy of small molecules at ordinary temperatures, but for higher temperatures this may not be so, and both internal entropy and energy changes may occur due to changes in vibrational levels on adsoiption. From a somewhat different point of view, it is clear that even in physical adsorption, adsorbate molecules should be polarized on the surface (see Section VI-8), and in chemisorption more drastic perturbations should occur. Thus internal bond energies of adsorbed molecules may be affected. [Pg.584]

The first term on the right is the common inverse cube law, the second is taken to be the empirically more important form for moderate film thickness (and also conforms to the polarization model, Section XVII-7C), and the last term allows for structural perturbation in the adsorbed film relative to bulk liquid adsorbate. In effect, the vapor pressure of a thin multilayer film is taken to be P and to relax toward P as the film thickens. The equation has been useful in relating adsorption isotherms to contact angle behavior (see Section X-7). Roy and Halsey [73] have used a similar equation earlier, Halsey [74] allowed for surface heterogeneity by assuming a distribution of Uq values in Eq. XVII-79. Dubinin s equation (Eq. XVII-75) has been mentioned another variant has been used by Bonnetain and co-workers [7S]. [Pg.629]

Returning to multilayer adsorption, the potential model appears to be fundamentally correct. It accounts for the empirical fact that systems at the same value of / rin P/F ) are in essentially corresponding states, and that the multilayer approaches bulk liquid in properties as P approaches F. However, the specific treatments must be regarded as still somewhat primitive. The various proposed functions for U r) can only be rather approximate. Even the general-appearing Eq. XVn-79 cannot be correct, since it does not allow for structural perturbations that make the film different from bulk liquid. Such perturbations should in general be present and must be present in the case of liquids that do not spread on the adsorbent (Section X-7). The last term of Eq. XVII-80, while reasonable, represents at best a semiempirical attempt to take structural perturbation into account. [Pg.654]

Adsorbates can physisorb onto a surface into a shallow potential well, typically 0.25 eV or less [25]. In physisorption, or physical adsorption, the electronic structure of the system is barely perturbed by the interaction, and the physisorbed species are held onto a surface by weak van der Waals forces. This attractive force is due to charge fiuctuations in the surface and adsorbed molecules, such as mutually induced dipole moments. Because of the weak nature of this interaction, the equilibrium distance at which physisorbed molecules reside above a surface is relatively large, of the order of 3 A or so. Physisorbed species can be induced to remain adsorbed for a long period of time if the sample temperature is held sufficiently low. Thus, most studies of physisorption are carried out with the sample cooled by liquid nitrogen or helium. [Pg.294]

Chemisorption occurs when the attractive potential well is large so that upon adsorption a strong chemical bond to a surface is fonued. Chemisorption involves changes to both the molecule and surface electronic states. For example, when oxygen adsorbs onto a metal surface, a partially ionic bond is created as charge transfers from the substrate to the oxygen atom. Other chemisorbed species interact in a more covalent maimer by sharing electrons, but this still involves perturbations to the electronic system. [Pg.294]

Flow markers are often chosen to be chemically pure small molecules that can fully permeate the GPC packing and elute as a sharp peak at the total permeation volume (Vp) of the column. Examples of a few common flow markers reported in the literature for nonaqueous GPC include xylene, dioctyl phthalate, ethylbenzene, and sulfur. The flow marker must in no way perturb the chromatography of the analyte, either by coeluting with the analyte peak of interest or by influencing the retention of the analyte. In all cases it is essential that the flow marker experience no adsorption on the stationary phase of the column. The variability that occurs in a flow marker when it experiences differences in how it adsorbs to a column is more than sufficient to obscure the flow rate deviations that one is trying to monitor and correct for. [Pg.549]

In order to discuss the nature of the interaction between an adsorbed molecule and a surface it is important that the surface coverage be less than one monolayer since in multimolecular adsorption and capillary condensation the spectrum of the adsorbate molecule perturbed by interaction with other adsorbate molecules may mask the spectrum of the adsorbate molecule perturbed by interaction with the adsorbent. Surface coverages may be determined by obtaining an adsorption isotherm with the adsorbate... [Pg.294]

Guidelli and co-workers336-338 measured the potential of zero charge by chronocoulometry. They found that the pzc was independent of the electrolyte concentration in both NaC104 and Na2S04. However, Ea=0 in the presence of sulfates was ca. 40 mV more negative. These authors have explained this apparent discrepancy in terms of the perturbation of the solvent structure at the interface by the ions at the electrode surface, which are, however, nonspecifically adsorbed. [Pg.63]

It is worth noting that each Na atom appears to perturb the electron density of the Pt(lll) surface over large ( 12) atomic distances. This can explain nicely the observed long-range promotional effect of Na on Pt surfaces. It is strongly reminiscent of the IR spectroscopic work of Yates and coworkers who showed that a single adsorbed alkali atom can affect the IR spectra of up to 27 coadsorbed CO molecules.80... [Pg.262]

The adsorption of Intact molecules Is encountered In many areas of electrochemistry. A complete description of the adsorbed state In terms of the orientation of the molecule, the way In which It bonds to the surface, the perturbation of the molecular structure caused by this additional bonding and the Interaction between adjacent molecules Is the ultimate goal of spectroscopic techniques. As more systems are studied by the EMIRS and SNIFTIRS methods, ways are being found to assess more of this Information. [Pg.562]


See other pages where Adsorbate perturbations is mentioned: [Pg.349]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.1283]    [Pg.1289]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.44]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.193 ]




SEARCH



The Perturbation of Solids by Adsorbed Molecules

© 2024 chempedia.info