ADOPTING PROACTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES

David J. EvansI ] of the University of Wisconsin-Stout wrote an article published in the June 1992 SSA Journal (Semiconductor Safety Association) entitled An Examination of the Air Toxics Proposals of the Clean Air Act Amendments and their Effects on the Semiconductor Industry. This article gives an excellent analysis of the potential impact of the Clean Air Act, Title III (hazardous air pollutants) and Title V (permits). Evans identifies potential proactive strategies that a semiconductor facility can adopt to be in a sound position to continue in business. These strategies take into account two significant factors  

Title III brings into federal, state and local regulation many key chemicals not previously covered under regulations which are key to the manufacture of semiconductor/integrated circuit devices. 

Permits will have to be completed for each process change which is not in keeping with the quick technology changes and different manufacturing processes used. Necessary permits will be delayed. 

Evans analyzed a proactive strategy that falls into four categories  

Evans conclusion captures the entire focus of this chapter  

---

There are also instances where businesses can be proactive in environmental stewardship despite an apparent loss in profits. In these situations, bnsinesses seemingly compromise their profits by voluntary adopting compliance strategies. These policies of self-regulation at times reach even beyond what is reconunended by the regulatory bodies. While what motivates such actions is not always clear, perhaps some of the following factors play a role in their decisions. 

---