Addition reactions stereoelectronics

It is interesting to speculate that asymmetric induction may be the consequence of the exo anomeric effect, a stereoelectronic effect that favors the conformation 5 that places the aglycone O-C bond antiperiplanar to the pyran C(1) —C(2) bond7fi. Related asymmetric induction has also been observed in aldehyde addition reactions of the related, but racemic, pinacol (Z)-y-(tetrahydropyranyloxy)allylboronate49. As indicated in the examples above, however, the level of diastereoselectivity is modest and the only application in asymmetric synthesis is Wuts exo-brevicomin synthesis75. 

Given the above possible reaction mechanism, it is then intriguing to speculate that another approach to the same stereoselective reduction of a vinyl sulphone could be achieved by the use of a suitably sterically hindered organosilane, as outlined in equation (64). Such a reaction would provide an interesting test for the stereoelectronics of a conjugate addition reaction by a second-row heteroatom to a vinyl sulphone. 

Enamines also react with electrophilic alkenes to give conjugate addition products. The addition reactions of enamines of cyclohexanones show a strong preference for attack from the axial direction.319 This is anticipated on stereoelectronic grounds because the tt orbital of the enamine is the site of nucleophilicity. 

Enantioselective Addition Reactions of Allylic Stannanes. There have been several studies of the enantiomers of a-oxygenated alkenyl stannanes. The chirality of the a-carbon exerts powerful control on enantioselectivity with the preference for the stannyl group to be anti to the forming bond. This is presumably related to the stereoelectronic effect that facilitates the transfer of electron density from the tin to the forming double bond.182... 

The necessity for reacting groups of substrates to collide with an orientation that allows productive interaction of electronic orbitals is often called a stereoelectronic effect. An example is the addition reaction of Eq. 9-74. Tire orbital of an unshared pair of electrons on the HO- ion must be perpendicular to the plane of the double bond. Furthermore, if the proton becomes attached to the adjacent carbon in a synchronous or concerted manner it must enter from the opposite side, as it does in Eq. 9-74. 

While the regiochemistry of simple electrophilic additions to double bonds is controlled by a combination of electronic (Maikovnikov rule), stereoelectronic (trans diaxial addition to cyclohexenes) and steric factors,9 the intramolecular nature of electrophilic heteroatom cyclizations introduces additional conformational, stereoelectronic and entropic factors. The combination of these factors in cyclofunctionalization reactions results in a general preference for exo cyclization over endo cyclization (Scheme 4).310 However, endo closure may predominate in cases where electronic or ring strain factors strongly favor that mode of cyclization. The observed regiochemistry may differ under conditions of kinetic control from that observed under conditions of thermodynamic control. 

The common starting material 32, derived from known lactam 31 [25], was treated with divinyl lithium cuprate to afford the adduct 33 as a single isomer. The stereoselectivity of this addition reaction can be explained by A(l 3) strain and stereoelectronic effect[26] the same as our recent investigations. On the other hand, deprotection of the TBDPS... 

The stereoselectivity of conjugate addition reaction of 34 can be rationalized as follows. The conformation of 34 is restricted to A by the oxazolizinone ring, and the vinyl anion attacks from stereoelectronically preferred (3-axial direction to give rise to the adduct 35 exclusively. 

The stereoselectivity of the second and key Michael-type conjugate addition reaction can be rationalized as follows. The conformation of 63 will be restricted to 63-A due to A(l 3) strain between the N-methoxycarbonyl and w-propyl groups in 63-B. Attack of the vinyl anion from the stereoelectronically favored a-axial direction provides the adduct 64 exclusively. It is noteworthy that the stereochemical course of the above reaction is controlled by the stereoelectronic effect in spite of severe 1,3-diaxial steric repulsion between the axial ethyl group at the 5-position and the incoming vinyl anion. This remarkable stereoselectivity can be also explained by Cieplak s hypothesis[31]. On the preferred conformation 63-A, the developing a of the transition state is stabilized by the antiperiplanar donor Gc-h at the C-4 position. 

Radical addition reactions are commonly used in organic synthesis. These additions range from the simple addition of halocarbons to tt bonds to cyclization reactions with demanding stereoelectronic requirements. 

The bulk of enamine studies since Stork s original publication have focused on establishing the breadth and limitations of individual substitution reactions and on extending the list of useful electrophiles. In addition, auxiliary studies have enriched our knowledge about the ambident nature of the vinyl nitrogen system, stereoelectronic factors governing its reactivity, its stability and spectroscopic properties. An increasing number of synthetic applications of these fundamental studies can be expected in future years. 

Once formed, 7 and 8 undergo a Michael reaction that gives rise to ketoenamine 9. Ring closure, to form 10, and loss of water then afforded 1,4-dihydropyridine 11. The presence of 9 and 10 could not be detected thus ring closure and dehydration were deduced to proceed faster than the Michael addition. This has the result of making the Michael addition the rate-determining step in this sequence. Conversely, if the reaction is run in the presence of a small amount of diethylamine, compounds related to 10 could be isolated. Diol 20 has been isolated in an unique case (R = CFb). Attempts to dehydrate this compound under a variety of conditions were unsuccessful. Stereoelectronic effects related to the dehydration may be the cause. In related heterocyclic ring formations, it has been determined that dehydration (20 —> 10) is about 10 times slower than diol formation (19 —> 20). Therefore, one would expect 20 to... 

---